Optimized Peak VO2 in Predicting Advanced HF

August 28, 2023 updated by: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Optimizing Risk Stratification in Predicting Poor Prognosis in Post-Acute Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

The ability and timely selection of severe heart failure (HF) patients for cardiac transplantation and advanced HF therapy is challenging. Peak VO2 by cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) was used for transplant listing. This study aimed to reassess the prognostic significance of peak VO2 and to compare that with the Heart Failure Survival Score in the current optimized novel guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Investigators retrospectively collected acute HF patients discharged alive from the hospital. Investigators divided participants into more-GDMT (≥2 kinds) and few-GDMT (<2 kinds) groups and compared the prognostic significance of peak VO2 and HFSS for combined all-cause mortality and urgent cardiac transplantation.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

377

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 83341
        • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital Heart Failure Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Investigators retrospectively collected acute HF patients discharged alive from the hospital. Investigators divided participants into more-GDMT (>= 2 kinds) and few-GDMT (<2 kinds) groups and compared the prognostic significance of peak VO2 and Heart Failure Survival Score for combined all-cause mortality and urgent cardiac transplantation.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • acute HF patients with reduced ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF <=40%) and discharged alive from the hospital
  • patients with age >= 20 years of age
  • patients who performed cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) within one month after discharge
  • patients with serum B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) level >100 pg/mL.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with estimated survival time < 6 months
  • patients who could not tolerate exercise test due to muscular-skeletal disorder or other reason
  • patients who had severe valvular heart disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
More-GDMT
Baseline guideline-directed medications therapy (GDMT), including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), and angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) were documented at discharge. More-GDMT group was defined as patient population received GDMT >=2 kinds of above medications.
CPET was performed in this HF cohort within one month after being discharged and interpreted as previously described. Patients underwent an upright graded cycle ergometer exercise using a personalized ramp protocol or a motorized treadmill using a modified Bruce or Cornell protocol. Peak VO2 data measured by cycle ergometer were increased by 10% to allow a comparison between the two different procedures. Peak VO2 was defined as the highest 30-second average value obtained during exercise. Submaximal CPET variables such as ventilatory efficiency were calculated by the slope of VE versus VCO2 below the ventilatory compensatory point (VCP). If the slope of VE/VCO2 can't be calculated, we used the nadir of VE/VCO2, or the ratio of VE/VCO2 at the anaerobic threshold (AT) as the variable of ventilatory efficiency. The AT was determined by the V-slope method.
Few-GDMT group
Baseline guideline-directed medications therapy (GDMT), including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA), and angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) were documented at discharge. Few GDMT-group was defined as patients who received GDMT < 2 kinds of the above medications.
CPET was performed in this HF cohort within one month after being discharged and interpreted as previously described. Patients underwent an upright graded cycle ergometer exercise using a personalized ramp protocol or a motorized treadmill using a modified Bruce or Cornell protocol. Peak VO2 data measured by cycle ergometer were increased by 10% to allow a comparison between the two different procedures. Peak VO2 was defined as the highest 30-second average value obtained during exercise. Submaximal CPET variables such as ventilatory efficiency were calculated by the slope of VE versus VCO2 below the ventilatory compensatory point (VCP). If the slope of VE/VCO2 can't be calculated, we used the nadir of VE/VCO2, or the ratio of VE/VCO2 at the anaerobic threshold (AT) as the variable of ventilatory efficiency. The AT was determined by the V-slope method.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
all-cause mortality
Time Frame: May, 2014 ~ June 2020
Number of participants that had occurrence of the mortality which is defined as all-cause mortality
May, 2014 ~ June 2020
urgent heart transplant
Time Frame: May, 2014 ~ June 2020
Number of participants that had occurrence of the urgent heart transplant
May, 2014 ~ June 2020

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shyh-Ming Chen, MD, Chang Gung Medical Foundation

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 28, 2023

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data sharing plans will be discussed with other investigators

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Failure

Clinical Trials on cardiopulmonary exercise test

3
Subscribe