Neuropathic Pain in Psoriatic Arthritis

October 4, 2022 updated by: Bezmialem Vakif University

Evaluation of Neuropathic Pain in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis

Pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases is suitable for eliciting neuropathic pain. The aim of this study is to evaluate the frequency of NP among PsA patients and relationship between disease activity, quality of life, functionality, and other numerous factors.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Neuropathic pain (NP) is the pain arising from a primary lesion or a dysfunction of nervous system. NP can affect central or peripheral nervous system and can be caused by numerous factors such as inflammation or neuroplastic changes. Inflammation can sensitize nociceptors in sensory nerves by promoting prostaglandin E2 and I2 secretion thus, cause neuropathic pain. Besides, a mixed pain pattern with neuropathic components is thought to be developed in chronic pain conditions. In this point of view, pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases is suitable for eliciting NP. In arthritic joints, even non-arthritic tissues are affected by the disease and a condition called peripheral sensitization develops. Previous studies about NP and inflammatory diseases link have focused on rheumatoid arthritis and number of studies about NP and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is limited. In this manner the aim of this study is to evaluate the frequency of NP among PsA patients and relationship between disease activity, quality of life, functionality, and other numerous factors.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
45

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
    • Fatih
      • Istanbul, Fatih, Turkey, 34093
        • Bezmialem Vakif University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult psoriatic arthritis patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • being aged≥18
  • being diagnosed PSA according to CASPAR criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • additional conditions that could cause neuropathic pain (e.g. radiculopathy, polyneuropathy, depression, fibromyalgia)
  • history of fracture or surgery
  • endocrinopathies that could cause neuropathic pain (e.g. DM)
  • malignancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Psoriatic Arthritis patients with neuropathic pain
Patients diagnosed with Psa according to The Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) psoriatic arthritis criteria. Who has a DN4 score of ≥4 or PainDETECT score of ≥13.
Other: painDETECT questionnaire
The painDETECT questionnaire was specifically developed to detect neuropathic pain components in adult patients with low back pain. It is also used in detecting the neuropathic pain in rheumatic diseases. A score between ≤12 represents a nonneuropathic pain, ≥13 and ≤18 represents a possible neuropathic pain, while a score of ≥19 represents a neuropathic pain.
Other: Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire (DN4)
DN4 is a clinician-administered questionnaire consisting of 10 items. Seven items related to pain quality (i.e. sensory and pain descriptors) are based on an interview with the patient and 3 items based on the clinical examination. A score of ≥4 represents a neuropathic pain.
Other: Short form-36
The 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) is a self-reported measure of health. It comprises 36 questions which cover eight domains of health. 1) Limitations in physical activities because of health problems. 2) Limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems 3) Limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems 4) Bodily pain 5) General mental health (psychological distress and well-being) 6) Limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems 7) Vitality (energy and fatigue) 8) General health perceptions. Each domain is scored between 0 and 100 and a higher score represents a better outcome.
Other: Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Enthesitis Index (SPARCC)
SPARCC was created as a measure for enthesitis in spondyloarthritis in general. It assesses 16 enthesial sites. Total number of the enthesitis is the total score of the evaluation. Total score is between 0 and 16, and higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Other: Numeric Rating Scale
Self reported pain scored between 0 (minimum)-10 (maximum). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Other: Disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (DAPSA)
DAPSA includes a 68/66 joint count summed with a patient global, patient pain score, and C- reactive protein level. The DAPSA provides a continuous score of arthritis activity and has validated cut points for remission (< 4) and low disease activity (< 14).
Psoriatic Arthritis patients with nonneuropathic pain
Patients diagnosed with Psa according to The Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) psoriatic arthritis criteria. Who has a DN4 score of ≤4 or PainDETECT score of ≤13.
Other: painDETECT questionnaire
The painDETECT questionnaire was specifically developed to detect neuropathic pain components in adult patients with low back pain. It is also used in detecting the neuropathic pain in rheumatic diseases. A score between ≤12 represents a nonneuropathic pain, ≥13 and ≤18 represents a possible neuropathic pain, while a score of ≥19 represents a neuropathic pain.
Other: Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire (DN4)
DN4 is a clinician-administered questionnaire consisting of 10 items. Seven items related to pain quality (i.e. sensory and pain descriptors) are based on an interview with the patient and 3 items based on the clinical examination. A score of ≥4 represents a neuropathic pain.
Other: Short form-36
The 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) is a self-reported measure of health. It comprises 36 questions which cover eight domains of health. 1) Limitations in physical activities because of health problems. 2) Limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems 3) Limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems 4) Bodily pain 5) General mental health (psychological distress and well-being) 6) Limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems 7) Vitality (energy and fatigue) 8) General health perceptions. Each domain is scored between 0 and 100 and a higher score represents a better outcome.
Other: Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Enthesitis Index (SPARCC)
SPARCC was created as a measure for enthesitis in spondyloarthritis in general. It assesses 16 enthesial sites. Total number of the enthesitis is the total score of the evaluation. Total score is between 0 and 16, and higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Other: Numeric Rating Scale
Self reported pain scored between 0 (minimum)-10 (maximum). Higher scores represent a worse outcome.
Other: Disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (DAPSA)
DAPSA includes a 68/66 joint count summed with a patient global, patient pain score, and C- reactive protein level. The DAPSA provides a continuous score of arthritis activity and has validated cut points for remission (< 4) and low disease activity (< 14).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency neuropathic pain in psoriatic arthritis patients
Time Frame: 1 day
The frequency of neuropathic pain in the PSA patients included in the study according to painDETECT and DN4 scores.
1 day
Disease activity in Psoriatic arthritis (DAPSA) score in two groups
Time Frame: 1 day
The statistical difference between two groups in terms of disease activity
1 day
Numeric Rating Scale (rest, movement) in two groups
Time Frame: 1 day
The statistical difference between two groups in terms of disease activity
1 day
Short form-36 survey in two groups
Time Frame: 1 day
The statistical difference between two groups in terms of SF-36 and subdomains
1 day
SPARCC enthesitis index in two groups
Time Frame: 1 day
he statistical difference between two groups in terms of SPARCC
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Bezmialem Vakif University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 22, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 3, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 4, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2020-06/95

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings