SPARC Smartphone Application for the Management of Sarcoidosis-Associated Fatigue (SPARC)

March 21, 2025 updated by: W. Ennis James, Medical University of South Carolina

The SPARC App: A Smartphone Application for the Management of Sarcoidosis-Associated Fatigue

Fatigue is a pervasive and disabling symptom in sarcoidosis with limited treatment options. There is a significant association between heightened stress and sarcoidosis-associated fatigue. The proposed project will evaluate the usability/feasibility of a smartphone-based stress management application for the self-management of sarcoidosis-associated stress and fatigue.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29403
        • Medical University of South Carolina

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Sarcoidosis diagnosis based on established criteria
  • ≥18 years old
  • able to speak, hear, and understand English
  • elevated SAF (FAS score ≥22)
  • owns smartphone with current data plan
  • willingness and ability to use app to engage in Breathing Awareness Meditation (BAM)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, eating disorder, narcolepsy, cancer diagnosis or treatment in past 12 months
  • positive screening for potential major depression (Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale [PHQ-8; α = .86] score ≥10)
  • untreated sleep apnea (based on home sleep study testing)
  • sarcoidosis exacerbation in past 3 months requiring increase in sarcoidosis medications
  • >2 hr travel distance to medical center (to reduce likelihood of no-show for focus groups)
  • active substance abuse or binge drinking (>21 drinks/week )

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: SPARC Group
Behavioral: Sarcoidosis Patient Assessment and Resource Companion App
The first group, called the "SPARC group" will be asked to download the SPARC app onto the participant's smartphone, will be shown how to use the app, and then will be asked to use the app to do guided meditations for ten minutes twice a day
Active Comparator: Enhanced Standard Care Control Group
Behavioral: Enhanced Standard Care
Participants will receive education about reducing fatigue associated with sarcoidosis during a normal clinic visit.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Participants Recruited
Time Frame: 6 months
Recruitment compared to number approached
6 months
Number of Participants Who Complete the Study
Time Frame: 6 months
Participants complete the study in it's entirety and are able to use the app appropriately
6 months
Number of Participants Who Maintain Adherence to at Least Daily Daily Breathing Awareness Meditation Sessions
Time Frame: 3 months
Adherence is defined by participants completing 70% of the breathing awareness meditation sessions
3 months
Treatment Satisfaction
Time Frame: Month 3
System Usability Scale (SUS) consists of ten statements each with five possible answers ranging from complete rejection to complete agreement. For each statement, the participant gives his or her approval or rejection in the form of a scale ranging from 1=strong approval to 5=strong rejection. The results of the SUS questionnaire are used to calculate a numerical value (SUS score). The results can have a value between 0 (worst application imaginable) and 100 (best application imaginable)
Month 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Autonomous Motivation
Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 24
Autonomous motivation is measured by the Treatment Self-Regulation Questionnaire (TSRQ), which is a 15 item scale that assesses the degree of autonomous self-regulation to explain why participants engage or would engage in healthy behavior. The higher the score, the better the outcome.
Week 0 and Week 24
Change in Sarcoidosis Associated Fatigue From Baseline to Month 6
Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 24
SAF is measured by Fatigue Assessment Scale which is a Fatigue Questionnaire (1 to 5-point scale x 10 questions for a total score range of 0 to 50) where a low value indicates less fatigued (better outcome) and a high value indicates more fatigued (worse outcome)
Week 0 and Week 24
Changes in Stress From Baseline to Month 6
Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 24
Stress is measured by the Perceived Stress Scale which is a 10 item scale that asks about feelings and thoughts during the last month. The scale ranges from 0-40, lower score meaning low stress, and a higher score meaning high stress. A negative change represents an improvement (decrease) in stress
Week 0 and Week 24
Changes in Quality of Life
Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 24
Quality of life is measured by the King's Sarcoidosis Health Questionnaire (KSQ), which is a 29 item scale that asks the participant questions about their general health, lung health, medications, skin, and eyes. Reliability = .90 -.97. A positive change represents an improvement (increase) in QOL. range 0-100; positive number = improvement
Week 0 and Week 24
Changes in Self-Efficacy From Baseline to Month 3
Time Frame: Week 0 and Week 12
Self-Efficacy is measured by the Fatigue Self-Efficacy Sale which is an 8 item scale to assess how the participant handles fatigue. Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores representing better fatigue self-efficacy.
Week 0 and Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medical University of South Carolina

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute for Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 23, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 22, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 25, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 25, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 4, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 9, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 6, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 21, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 00107105
  • 1R21EB025525 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings