Defining Decision Thresholds for Judgments on Health Benefits and Harms: Study Protocol

February 11, 2022 updated by: McMaster University

Defining Decision Thresholds for Judgments on Health Benefits and Harms Using the GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) Frameworks: Protocol for a Randomized Methodological Study (GRADE-THRESHOLD)

The objective of this study is an approach to derive and use decision-thresholds for judgments on health benefits and harms using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The objective of this study is to derive decision-thresholds (DTs) for Evidence to Decision (EtD) judgments on the magnitude of health benefits and harms. The study hypothesis is that DTs could discriminate between the four categories for EtD judgments. Explicit DTs, providing an indication for which could be the appropriate judgment for a given scenario, might have the potential to support panels of decision-makers in their work, facilitate a common understanding, and promote consistency and transparency in judgments.

Study investigators will conduct a methodological randomized controlled trial to collect the data that allow deriving the decision-thresholds. They will invite clinicians, epidemiologists, decision scientists, health research methodologists, experts in Health Technology Assessment (HTA), members of guideline development groups and the public to participate in the trial. Then, investigators will investigate the validity of decision-threshold by measuring the agreement between judgments that were made in the past by guideline panels and the judgments that the DTs approach would suggest if applied on the same guideline data.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1406

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Holger J Schunemann, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: 24699 +19055259140
  • Email: schuneh@mcmaster.ca

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8S 4K1
        • Recruiting
        • McMaster University
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Holger J Schunemann, MD, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Gian Paolo Morgano, PhD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Wojtek Wiercioch, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

The target population of the survey will include:

  • clinicians
  • epidemiologist
  • decision scientists
  • health research methodologists
  • experts in health technology assessment (HTA)
  • and members of guideline working groups
  • members from the general public

Exclusion Criteria:

• Prior participation in the survey

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Threshold estimates
Descriptive case-scenarios
Each case-scenario will include: (1) a GRADE Summary of Finding (SoF) table providing information about the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO), the relative and absolute anticipated effects of the intervention, and the certainty in the evidence; (2) a Health Outcome Descriptor describing key attributes of the outcome under consideration including symptoms, time horizon, testing and treatment, and consequences; a measure of the impact on health of the outcome (also known as 'value' of the outcome or 'health utility' in health economics).
Active Comparator: Alternative threshold estimates
Descriptive case-scenarios
Each case-scenario will include: (1) a GRADE Summary of Finding (SoF) table providing information about the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO), the relative and absolute anticipated effects of the intervention, and the certainty in the evidence; (2) a Health Outcome Descriptor describing key attributes of the outcome under consideration including symptoms, time horizon, testing and treatment, and consequences; a measure of the impact on health of the outcome (also known as 'value' of the outcome or 'health utility' in health economics).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Small effect of an intervention
Time Frame: immediate after completion of study
Questionnaire: Participants will be asked to indicate which decision threshold for discriminating between EtD judgments of 'Trivial or None' and 'Small' they felt appropriate at the time of participation in the survey.
immediate after completion of study
Moderate effect of an intervention
Time Frame: immediate after completion of study
Questionnaire:Participants will be asked to indicate which decision threshold for discriminating between EtD judgments of 'Small' and 'Moderate' they felt appropriate at the time of participation in the survey.
immediate after completion of study
Large effect of an intervention
Time Frame: immediate after completion of study
Questionnaire:Participants will be asked to indicate which decision threshold for discriminating between EtD judgments of 'Moderate' and Large' they felt appropriate at the time of participation in the survey.
immediate after completion of study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 9, 2020

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2022

Last Verified

February 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • GRADETHRESHLD

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Decision Support Techniques

Clinical Trials on descriptive case-scenarios

Search Similar Trials