Clinician JUdgment Versus Risk Score to Predict Stroke outComes: The JURASSIC Clinical Trial (JURASSIC)

October 27, 2012 updated by: Gustavo Saposnik, Unity Health Toronto

Clinician JUdgment Versus Risk Score to Predict Stroke outComes:

Background: Several risk score models are now available to assist clinicians estimate outcomes after an acute ischemic stroke. Limited information is available on the predictive value of these scores compared to real outcomes and clinical judgment.

Objectives: To compare clinician judgment with the use of a validated stroke risk score (iScore) and patients' outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

A convenience sample of 111 practicing clinicians (general and vascular neurologists, internists, and ER physicians) predicted the outcomes of 5 stroke patients based on case summaries. Cases were randomly selected as being representative of the 10 most common clinical scenarios (n=1,415) from a pool of over 12,000 patients admitted to stroke centers in Ontario, Canada. Stroke cases had known clinical presentation, comorbidities, stroke severity, and outcomes.

All participants are active practicing physicians caring for patients with acute stroke. Conditions were standardized to mimic clinical practice.

Main outcomes of interest included 30-day mortality and death or disability at discharge.

Secondary outcome: death or institutionalization at discharge

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

111

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
        • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5B 1W8
        • St Michael's Hospital
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3H 2R9
        • McGill University Health Centre
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Practicing and active physicians managing patients with stroke

Exclusion Criteria:

  • retired physicians
  • physicians not exposed to care for stroke patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Randomized clinical scenarios
Clinicians are randomized to a sequence of 5 clinical scenarios
Clinicians will be randomized to a sequence of 5 clinical scenarios with a variable range of expected outcome [i.e. from low (<10%) to high (>50%) expected risk death at 30 days].

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
30 Day Mortality or Disability (mRS >3) at discharge
Time Frame: Death after 30 days from ischemic stroke onset or Disability following hospital discharge
Death after 30 days from ischemic stroke onset or Disability following hospital discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Death at 30 days
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
Death or institutionalization at discharge
Time Frame: up to 30 days after discharge
up to 30 days after discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gustavo Saposnik, MD MSc FRCPC, Unity Health Toronto

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 30, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

August 6, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 30, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 27, 2012

Last Verified

October 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SMH 09-020
  • 09-020 (Other Identifier: St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on Clinical scenarios

3
Subscribe