Optimal Timing of Endoscopic Intervention in the Treatment of Chronic Pancreatitis. (TEST)

November 17, 2025 updated by: Zhuan Liao, Changhai Hospital

Optimal Timing of Endoscopic Intervention After Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Chronic Pancreatitis With Pancreatic Stones.

This study aims to determine the optimal timing of endoscopic intervention after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy(ESWL) of chronic pancreatitis with pancreatic stones.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Chronic pancreatitis（CP）is a chronic progressive fibro-inflammatory disease of the pancreas induced by a wide range of factors including genetic and environmental elements, with recurrent abdominal pain and pancreatic secretion insufficiency as its major clinical signs. Chronic pancreatitis is not only a tough disease of the gastrointestinal system but also a worldwide medical problem. At present, the MESS (medicine-extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-surgery）formed by changhai hospital in CP diagnosis and treatment is gradually becoming mature, and the clinical effect of this system is obvious. However, there are still some difficulties and knowledge gaps in the clinical treatment of CP. Currently, it is recommended by both domestic and foreign guidelines that ERCP combined with ESWL as the first-line treatment pattern for patients with chronic pancreatitis associate pain. It has previously been observed that ERCP performed less than 2 days after ESWL may be more likely to fail, possibly owing to ESWL-induced edema. However, there is no high-quality research to demonstrate how to choose the most optimal timing of ERCP after ESWL for patients with indications for endoscopic treatment. This prospective, randomized controlled research has therefore aimed to determine the most optimal timing of ERCP after ESWL. Patients with painful chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic stones larger than 5 mm in diameter will be randomly and equally assigned to two groups, which are divided according to the time interval between ESWL and ERCP, including the same day (< 12 hours) subgroup and the next day ( ≥12 hours) subgroup. The cannulation success rate and stone clearance rate of the pancreatic duct will be assessed in each group to explore the most appropriate timing of ERCP, and then provide an important reference basis for the clinical treatment of chronic pancreatitis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
220

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
      • Shanghai, China, 200433
        • Changhai Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. symptomatic adult patients diagnosed with chronic pancreatitis and main pancreatic duct positive stones（>5mm in diameter）
  2. no ERCP and ESWL history before the admission
  3. provides informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. suspected to have malignant tumors;
  2. history of pancreatic surgery or gastrojejunostomy (Billroth II);
  3. with end-stage disease;
  4. with contraindications to ESWL or ERCP, such as pregnancy, abdominal aortic aneurysm, etc.
  5. acute pancreatitis within 3 days
  6. pancreatic ascites

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Endoscopic group <12h
The patients received intravenous analgesia (flurbiprofen and remifentanil) before the ESWL (Compact Delta II; Dornier Med Tech, Wessling, Germany). After the last ESWL session, the patients are treated with following ERCP within 12h. ERCP was performed under conscious sedation with intramuscular administration of diazepam 2.5-5.0 mg and pethidine 25-50 mg. If necessary, endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed. A dilating bougie or balloon will be used to dilate the stenosis after sphincterotomy. Standard techniques (i.e., extraction basket, extraction balloon, or both) will be used for stone removal. A pancreatic duct stent for drainage and nasopancreatic catheters will be inserted for temporary drainage if necessary.
Procedure: time interval between ESWL and ERCP is 12h
The patients received intravenous analgesia before the ESWL. After the last ESWL session, the patients are treated with following ERCP within 12h.
Other Names:
  • ESWL
  • ERCP
Drug: morphine, buprenorphine, pethidine, tramaldol, metamizole and acetylsalicylacid (Analgesics)
Analgesics administrated include morphine, buprenorphine, pethidine, tramaldol, metamizole and acetylsalicylacid. They will only be administrated as needed.
Active Comparator: Endoscopic group ≥12 h
The patients received intravenous analgesia (flurbiprofen and remifentanil) before the ESWL (Compact Delta II; Dornier Med Tech, Wessling, Germany). The time scale between the last ESWL session and following ERCP is greater than 12h. ERCP was performed under conscious sedation with intramuscular administration of diazepam 2.5-5.0 mg and pethidine 25-50 mg. If necessary, endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed. A dilating bougie or balloon will be used to dilate the stenosis after sphincterotomy. Standard techniques (i.e., extraction basket, extraction balloon, or both) will be used for stone removal. A pancreatic duct stent for drainage and nasopancreatic catheters will be inserted for temporary drainage if necessary.
Drug: morphine, buprenorphine, pethidine, tramaldol, metamizole and acetylsalicylacid (Analgesics)
Analgesics administrated include morphine, buprenorphine, pethidine, tramaldol, metamizole and acetylsalicylacid. They will only be administrated as needed.
Procedure: time interval between ESWL and ERCP is greater than 12h
The patients received intravenous analgesia before the ESWL. After the last ESWL session, the patients are treated with following ERCP ≥12 h.
Other Names:
  • ESWL
  • ERCP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful MPD Cannulation Rates
Time Frame: during ERCP procedure
technical success rate of pancreatic cannulation
during ERCP procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful clearance of MPD stones
Time Frame: during ERCP procedure
Ductal clearance has been defined as complete, partial, or unsuccessful if the proportion of stones cleared was > 90 %, 50 %-90 %, or < 50 %, respectively.
during ERCP procedure
post-ERCP complications
Time Frame: 30 days
Major post-ERCP complications includes post-ERCP pancreatitis, bleeding, infection, and perforation, which are classified as mild, moderate, or severe, depending mainly on the length of hospitalization and the need for invasive treatment.
30 days
severity of post-ERCP complications
Time Frame: 30 days
severity are classified as mild, moderate, or severe, depending mainly on the length of hospitalization and the need for invasive treatment.
30 days

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment-related costs in RMB from initial enrollment to the end of the study
Time Frame: through endotherapy completion, an average of 14days
The total costs in RMB of each hospitalization
through endotherapy completion, an average of 14days
The hospitalization time
Time Frame: through endotherapy completion, an average of 14days
Length of hospitalization due to ESWL /ERCP and complications
through endotherapy completion, an average of 14days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Changhai Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Zhuan Liao, MD, Changhai Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 18, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 20, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 10, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 7, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 19, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 17, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Optimal Timing of Endoscopic

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings