Cannabidiol in Youth Alcohol Use Disorder

July 29, 2025 updated by: Medical University of South Carolina

Neurobehavioral Effects of Cannabidiol in Youth Alcohol Use Disorder

The goal of this study is to test cannabidiol (CBD) as a potentially effective candidate medication for youth alcohol use disorder (AUD). To accomplish this goal, this study will use a randomized, double-blind, within-subjects crossover design. In counterbalanced order, 50 youth (ages 16-22) will receive 600 mg of CBD or placebo three hours before a neuroimaging and behavioral assessment paradigm. The total amount of time the participant will be in the study is approximately one month.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
36

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 22 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Age 16 to 22. Does or does not drink alcohol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Cannabidiol, Then Placebo
Drug: Cannabidiol
In counterbalanced order, 50 youth (ages 16-22) will receive 600mg of cannabidiol or placebo three hours before a neuroimaging and behavioral assessment paradigm, separated by an approximate 18-day washout period.
Other Names:
  • Placebo
Experimental: Placebo, Then Cannabidiol
Drug: Cannabidiol
In counterbalanced order, 50 youth (ages 16-22) will receive 600mg of cannabidiol or placebo three hours before a neuroimaging and behavioral assessment paradigm, separated by an approximate 18-day washout period.
Other Names:
  • Placebo

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Concentrations of Glx (i.e., Glutamate + Glutamine)
Time Frame: Changes 3 hours after administration of 600mg CBD vs. placebo
Using magnetic resonance spectroscopy and a within-subjects design, we measured Concentrations of Glx (i.e., glutamate + glutamine) levels in the anterior cingulate cortex in adolescents during cannabidiol (600mg) or placebo administration. Values provided are absolute values (mmol/kg) measured 3 hours after medication administration. Due to complexities of this method, "normal" levels of Glx are not known; thus, we cannot make conclusions about the meaning of "higher" or "lower" glutamate levels when comparing cannabidiol to placebo.
Changes 3 hours after administration of 600mg CBD vs. placebo
GABA+
Time Frame: Changes 3 hours after administration of 600mg CBD vs. placebo
Using magnetic resonance spectroscopy and a within-subjects design, we measured GABA+ (GABA plus macromolecules) levels in the anterior cingulate cortex in adolescents during cannabidiol (600mg) or placebo administration. Values provided are absolute values (mmol/kg) measured 3 hours after medication administration. Due to complexities of this method, "normal" levels of GABA are not known; thus, we cannot make conclusions about the meaning of "higher" or "lower" GABA levels when comparing cannabidiol to placebo.
Changes 3 hours after administration of 600mg CBD vs. placebo
Alcohol Cue Reactivity Neural Activation
Time Frame: Changes 3 hours after administration of 600mg CBD vs. placebo
Assessing the change in neural reactivity to alcohol cues after each round of medication: Cannabidiol vs. placebo. Cue reactivity is a type of learned response which is observed in individuals who use substances (e.g., alcohol) and involves significant physiological reactions to presentations of substance-related stimuli (i.e., alcohol images) in comparison to neutral images (e.g., non-alcoholic beverages ) measured by BOLD (Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent response). ROIs were (left and right hemisphere): amygdala, caudate, insula, nucleus accumbens, and putamen. The mean Z-statistic within each ROI mask is reported. A Z-score of 0 represents the population mean (e.g., no activation), where higher absolute Z-scores indicate greater evidence of activation (positive or negative) in the ROI compared to baseline. Z-scores do not have inherent clinical thresholds. Higher Z-scores generally reflect stronger task-related BOLD signal changes.
Changes 3 hours after administration of 600mg CBD vs. placebo
Heart Rate Variability
Time Frame: Changes 2 hours after administration of 600mg CBD vs. placebo
All participants underwent an in vivo, olfactory alcohol cue exposure procedure. Participants smelled water followed by the participant's preferred beverage containing alcohol and apple juice in a counterbalanced order for three minutes each, with a three-minute rest period in between each liquid. The contents were poured into a cup in the participant's presence. During the task, electrocardiogram data were collected and used to create the heart rate variability (HRV) outcome related to the Sympathetic: Vagal ratio, which is the ratio of low-frequency to high-frequency power, derived from spectral HRV analysis. Higher values suggest increased sympathetic activity or reduced vagal activity.
Changes 2 hours after administration of 600mg CBD vs. placebo
PhenX Toolkit Alcohol Urges Questionnaire
Time Frame: Changes 2 hours after administration of 600mg CBD vs. placebo
All participants underwent an in vivo, olfactory alcohol cue exposure procedure. Participants smelled water followed by the participant's preferred beverage containing alcohol and apple juice in a counterbalanced order for three minutes each, with a three-minute rest period in between each liquid. The contents were poured into a cup in the participant's presence. After each beverage exposure, self-reported alcohol craving was collected via the PhenX Toolkit Alcohol Urges Questionnaire (AUQ). The AUQ consists of eight statements about the participant's feelings and thoughts about drinking as they are completing the questionnaire (i.e., right now). The participant was asked to respond to each statement about alcohol craving via a 7-item Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree" with a scare range of 8 to 56 where higher scores represent higher alcohol craving.
Changes 2 hours after administration of 600mg CBD vs. placebo

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Medical University of South Carolina

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 25, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 25, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 8, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 14, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 29, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro00119770

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings