Written Exposure Therapy for Veterans With SUD and PTSD (WET)

February 17, 2026 updated by: VA Office of Research and Development

Written Exposure Therapy (WET) as a Brief Trauma Treatment for Veterans With Co-occurring Substance Use Disorders and PTSD

The proposed project will evaluate the efficacy of written exposure therapy (WET) among Veterans engaged in substance use disorder (SUD) treatment, who present with co-occurring posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). While SUD treatment programs traditionally do not address PTSD, effective trauma treatments have been used successfully among those with substance use comorbidities. WET is a brief trauma-focused intervention shown to effectively treat PTSD. In a recent acceptability and feasibility pilot study among Veterans with co-occurring SUD and PTSD, results showed a decrease in PTSD symptoms among participants receiving WET. The goal of the present study is to improve outcomes for Veterans who present for SUD treatment with comorbid SUD/PTSD.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is a randomized clinical trial within a Substance Use Disorder (SUD) specialty clinic to evaluate whether treatment as usual (TAU) plus Written Exposure Therapy (WET) is superior to TAU augmented by a neutral topic writing condition on both PTSD and addiction outcomes for Veterans in SUD treatment. Veterans with a current diagnosis of SUD and comorbid PTSD will be randomized to either WET plus TAU or TAU augmented by a neutral topic writing condition. During the first writing session, participants will be asked to write about either a personal traumatic experience (WET) or a neutral topic (control). In sessions 2 through 5, participants will again meet with the study therapist for 45 minutes (maintaining the same writing condition as assigned in session one). Measures of trauma symptoms, distress, and mood will be collected at each writing session, with additional assessments at baseline, at post-treatment (following 5 writing sessions), 8-weeks, and 12-weeks post-baseline assessment. The primary aim of this study is to examine whether WET augmentation of TAU improves trauma symptoms for Veterans with SUD and PTSD who are receiving outpatient SUD treatment compared to TAU with a neutral writing control. The secondary aim will examine whether WET improves SUD outcomes for Veterans with comorbid PTSD compared to TAU with a neutral writing control. If results prove promising, they will support WET as an effective brief, cost efficient, easy to disseminate, adjunct to current SUD treatment for Veterans with comorbid PTSD.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
170

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Vera Bici, BA
  • Phone Number: 15448 (203) 932-5711
  • Email: Vera.Bici@va.gov

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Connecticut
      • West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516-2770
        • Recruiting
        • VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Sarah Meshberg-Cohen, PhD MS BS
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Veterans ages 18 years old or older;
  • Meets DSM-5 criteria for at least one substance use disorder (SUD);
  • Meets DSM-5 criteria for PTSD;
  • Approved for SUD treatment at VA Connecticut Healthcare System.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Veterans who meet current criteria for schizophrenia, schizophrenia-type disorders, or unmedicated mania or bipolar disorder as determined by QuickSCID-5;
  • current suicidal or homicidal risks necessitating a higher level of care;
  • Veterans who have received an Evidence-Based Psychotherapy for PTSD protocol within the past 6 months;
  • Problems that would prevent a participant from completing the writing intervention or study assessments (e.g., illiteracy). To assess for literacy, participants will read parts of the consent out loud.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Written Exposure Therapy
Written Exposure Therapy (WET) plus Treatment As Usual (TAU). WET is a 5 session, evidence-based trauma-focused written narrative exposure treatment. At each session, patients are instructed to write about the same trauma event and therapists provide feedback about adherence and offer suggestions. The first session includes psychoeducation about PTSD and a treatment rationale prior to general trauma narrative writing instructions, and specific instructions for completing the first writing session, before completing the first writing (30 minutes) session. Participants are instructed to write about the same trauma event at each following session, with an emphasis on delving into their deepest emotions and thoughts, in as much detail as possible, about the event. All writing sessions begin with specific instructions from the therapist followed by 30 minutes of writing by the participant.
Behavioral: Written Exposure Therapy
Written Exposure Therapy is a 5 session treatment in which individuals write about their trauma event in a specified manner.
Other Names:
  • Trauma-focused Treatment
Active Comparator: Neutral Topic Writing
Treatment As Usual (TAU) augmented by a neutral topic writing condition. The neutral topic writing condition involves writing about an assigned topic during each of the five writing sessions. As opposed to writing about trauma, the specific focus of this condition is on writing for 30 minutes about topics related to their life without writing about emotions or opinions. Rather, they are asked to write about specific objects or events in detail, as accurately as possible, and with as much description as possible. All writing sessions begin with specific instructions from the therapist followed by 30 minutes of writing by the participant.
Behavioral: Neutral Topic Writing
Treatment as Usual augmented by 5 sessions of Neutral Topic Writing which involves writing about specific objects (e.g., what they have eaten over the past week) or events (e.g., what they did since yesterday) in detail without discussing thoughts or feelings.
Other Names:
  • Control Writing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
Time Frame: 8-week Post-Baseline Follow-up
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) will be used to collect information on PTSD symptoms. The PCL-5 for DSM-5 is a 20-item self-report measure, selected for its dimensional sensitivity, with higher scores reflecting greater PTSD severity. Scoring is based on how much the patient has been bothered by the symptoms on a scale from "0 = not at all" to "4 = extremely." PCL scores will be collected based upon symptoms experienced in the past month at Baseline as well as each Post-Baseline Follow-up (8-weeks and 12-weeks), while the weekly PCL-5 will be administered at each of the five writing sessions and post-treatment (after 5 writing sessions) assessment. PCL-5 total symptom severity scores range from 0 to 80 with higher scores indicating greater PTSD severity.
8-week Post-Baseline Follow-up
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5)
Time Frame: 12-week Post-Baseline Follow-up
PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) will be used to collect information on PTSD symptoms. The PCL-5 for DSM-5 is a 20-item self-report measure, selected for its dimensional sensitivity, with higher scores reflecting greater PTSD severity. Scoring is based on how much the patient has been bothered by the symptoms on a scale from "0 = not at all" to "4 = extremely." PCL scores will be collected based upon symptoms experienced in the past month at Baseline as well as each Post-Baseline Follow-up (8-weeks and 12-weeks), while the weekly PCL-5 will be administered at each of the five writing sessions and post-treatment (after 5 writing sessions) assessment. PCL-5 total symptom severity scores range from 0 to 80 with higher scores indicating greater PTSD severity.
12-week Post-Baseline Follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB)
Time Frame: 8-week Post-Baseline Follow-up
Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) will be provided at baseline, and at post-treatment (after 5 writing sessions), 8-week, and 12-week post-baseline follow-up. Calendar-based interviews using the Timeline Follow-Back (TLFB) method will document the frequency of drug and alcohol use for the 3 months prior to baseline assessment, and during the writing sessions (taken at post-treatment follow-up), 8-week, and 12-week post-baseline follow-up. Following baseline, the TLFB will capture days since last assessment (e.g., days between baseline and post-treatment, post-treatment, and 8-weeks, and 8- to 12-week follow-up). Higher numbers of days of use will equal higher substance use.
8-week Post-Baseline Follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
VA Office of Research and Development

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sarah Meshberg-Cohen, PhD MS BS, VA Connecticut Healthcare System West Haven Campus, West Haven, CT

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 26, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 12, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 6, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 17, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MHBP-010-21F

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified, anonymized dataset will be created. This dataset may be shared with other investigators, upon written request, under a data use agreement prohibiting the recipient from identifying or re-de-identifying (or taking steps to identify or re-identify) any individual whose data are included in the dataset. The data sharing agreement will also restrict redistribution to third parties and proper acknowledgment of the data source. These datasets will be shared per guidelines provided by VACHS Information Security Officer.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After study completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

After study completion for no less than 7 years

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings