Effect of Prophylactic TMR and RPNI on Neuroma and Phantom Limb Pain
Prophylactic Treatment of Neuroma and Phantom Limb Pain With Targeted Muscle Reinnervation (TMR) and Regenerative Peripheral Interface (RPNI) at the Time of Major Limb Amputation: A Randomized Control Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Muhammad H Harirah, MD
- Phone Number: (214) 645-2353
- Email: Muhammad.Harirah@UTSouthwestern.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Travis G Boyd, MD
- Phone Number: (214) 645-2353
- Email: Travis.Boyd@UTSouthwestern.edu
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients ≥18 years old
- Patients scheduled for amputation of upper or lower extremity (including digit, ray, and hand) as a primary or secondary sequela of trauma.
- Patients scheduled for amputation of upper or lower extremity (including digit, ray, and hand) for primary or secondary sequelae of malignancy.
- Secondary sequalae include but is not limited to metastatic disease and osteolytic disease.
- Patients scheduled for amputation of upper or lower extremity (including digit, ray, and hand) for vasculitic diseases.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients less than 18 years old
- Patients with cognitive impairment
- Patients who are imprisoned at the time of randomization
- Patients currently enrolled in other studies relating to neuropathic pain
- Patients actively undergoing radiation therapy
- Patients with existing neuroma or underwent prior neuroma surgery
- Patients with amputations scheduled congenital reasons
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Control Arm
Standard Post-Amputation Surgical Care: Briefly, the transected nerves will be blindly tucked into surrounding bulky soft tissue to protect the nerve ends before the wound is closed.
|
Standard post-amputation surgical care involves placing transected nerve ends into muscle/soft tissue proximal to the site of amputation.
|
|
Experimental: Targeted Muscle Re-innervation
Briefly, each transected nerve is identified after amputation using 6-0 Prolene suture and is dissected proximally for length.
With minimal dissection, a nerve stimulator is used to identify functional motor nerve branches.
Near the point where the motor branch enters the muscle, the motor nerve branch is transected and an end-to-end coaptation is performed with a nearby tagged amputated nerve.
|
Targeted Muscle Re-innervation involves re-routing transected nerve ends to functional motor nerves proximal to the site of amputation.
|
|
Experimental: Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface
Briefly, a muscle graft (usually from the amputated limb) is wrapped around the clean ends of the transected nerve(s).
|
Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface involves placing transected nerve ends in harvested muscle grafts.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Phantom Limb Pain
Time Frame: Specifically at the time point 1 year after their primary incisions have healed.
|
The primary outcome measure of the study will the incidence of phantom limb pain in each group over the course of the recovery period.
|
Specifically at the time point 1 year after their primary incisions have healed.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain intensity score as measured PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) score
Time Frame: Until 2 years after incisions have healed.
|
Pain intensity score is measured bv PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Scores via patient questionnaires administered at follow-up visits.
Possible scores range from 1-5 where higher scores indicate worse outcome (pain severity).
|
Until 2 years after incisions have healed.
|
|
Pain interference score as measured by PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement information System) questionnaire
Time Frame: Until 2 years after incisions have healed.
|
Pain interference score as measured by PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement information System) scores via patient questionnaires administered at follow-up visits.
Possible scores range from 1-5, where higher scores indicate worse outcome (pain interference).
|
Until 2 years after incisions have healed.
|
|
Pain behavior measured by PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire
Time Frame: Until 2 years after incisions have healed.
|
Pain behavior score measured by PROMIS (Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) questionnaire that pertains to subject social health.
Raw summed score from 8 to 40, where 40 represents severely maladaptive pain behavior.
|
Until 2 years after incisions have healed.
|
|
Narcotic medical use post-operatively as measured by MME (Morphine Milligram Equivalent) Score
Time Frame: Until 2 years after incisions have healed.
|
Narcotic medical use post-operatively as measured by MME (Morphine Milligram Equivalent) Score This is a tool to condense and standardize the patient's narcotic pain regimen.
|
Until 2 years after incisions have healed.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Deborah Noble, UT Southwestern Department of Plastic Surgery
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):422-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.005.
- Valerio IL, Dumanian GA, Jordan SW, Mioton LM, Bowen JB, West JM, Porter K, Ko JH, Souza JM, Potter BK. Preemptive Treatment of Phantom and Residual Limb Pain with Targeted Muscle Reinnervation at the Time of Major Limb Amputation. J Am Coll Surg. 2019 Mar;228(3):217-226. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.12.015. Epub 2019 Jan 8.
- Dumanian GA, Potter BK, Mioton LM, Ko JH, Cheesborough JE, Souza JM, Ertl WJ, Tintle SM, Nanos GP, Valerio IL, Kuiken TA, Apkarian AV, Porter K, Jordan SW. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation Treats Neuroma and Phantom Pain in Major Limb Amputees: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Ann Surg. 2019 Aug;270(2):238-246. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003088.
- Santosa KB, Oliver JD, Cederna PS, Kung TA. Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces for Prevention and Management of Neuromas. Clin Plast Surg. 2020 Apr;47(2):311-321. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2020.01.004. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
- Eberlin KR, Ducic I. Surgical Algorithm for Neuroma Management: A Changing Treatment Paradigm. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Oct 16;6(10):e1952. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001952. eCollection 2018 Oct.
- Kubiak CA, Kemp SWP, Cederna PS, Kung TA. Prophylactic Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces to Prevent Postamputation Pain. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Sep;144(3):421e-430e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005922.
- Kuiken TA, Barlow AK, Hargrove L, Dumanian GA. Targeted Muscle Reinnervation for the Upper and Lower Extremity. Tech Orthop. 2017 Jun;32(2):109-116. doi: 10.1097/BTO.0000000000000194.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- STU-2021-0348
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.