Effect of Differently Fed Farmed Gilthead Sea Bream Consumption

June 9, 2022 updated by: Smaragdi Antonopoulou, Harokopio University

Effect of Fish Consumption Enriched With Biologically Active Lipids From Olive Pomace, on Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Apparently Healthy Volunteers

The trial was a double-blind randomized dietary intervention study with a 1:1 allocation ratio, conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study compared two treatments, i.e., farmed fish fed with olive pomace enriched diet (enriched fish; EF) versus farmed fish fed with fish oil diet (conventional fish; CF), using a crossover design. The study lasted 22 weeks; treatment period one (8 weeks, mid-January-end of March), washout period (6 weeks), and treatment period two (8 weeks, mid-May-end of July). The participants were equally distributed to the two treatments along treatment periods. Eligible subjects were all adults aged between 30 and 65 years old with a body mass index (BMI) between 24.0 and 31.0 kg/m2 who met the eligibility criteria for habitual fish consumption (<150 g of cooked fish per week). Exclusion criteria were pregnancy, current or recent weight loss effort, use of dietary supplements and being under treatment for any medical disorder. Subjects were allowed to use medical treatment for thyroid gland disorders, iron or folic acid supplements, contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy (HRT) for women, provided they would continue receiving their medication throughout the study. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of consumption of fillets from differently fed farmed gilthead sea bream on markers of cardiometabolic health such as platelet aggregation, circulating haemostatic markers, markers of inflammation and oxidative stress.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
38

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Greece
    • Attica
      • Kallithéa, Attica, Greece, 17671
        • Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Health Sciences and Education, Harokopio University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 30-65 years old
  • Body Mass Index between 24-31 kg/m^2
  • Habitual fish consumption: <150 g of cooked fish per week

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Current or recent weight loss effort
  • Use of dietary supplements
  • Being under treatment for any medical disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Conventional fish
This arm will consume 2 portions of gilthead seabream fed with conventional diet. Each portion weighed on average 380 g (raw, quantity of edible fillet approximately 170 g). Participants were instructed to consume fish twice weekly, one portion at a time.
Behavioral: Conventional fish
Participants initially randomized to this intervention arm will be provided with conventional sea bream fillets and will be asked to consume them twice weekly for 8 weeks. Conventional sea bream fillets will be produced by a fish farming company using standard procedures. Participants will also be instructed to keep the reception of prescribed medications and dietary supplements stable and not to change their lifestyle habits (e.g. other dietary habits besides fish consumption, physical activity habits or sleep habits) during the intervention. After a 6-week wash-out period (no fish consumption), participants will cross over to the other intervention arm.
Experimental: Enriched fish
This arm will consume 2 portions of gilthead seabream fed with olive pomace enriched diet. Each portion weighed on average 380 g (raw, quantity of edible fillet approximately 170 g). Participants were instructed to consume fish twice weekly, one portion at a time.
Behavioral: Enriched fish
Participants initially randomized to this intervention arm will be provided with conventional sea bream fillets and will be asked to consume them twice weekly for 8 weeks. Conventional sea bream fillets will be produced by a fish farming company using a diet enriched with olive pomace. Participants will also be instructed to keep the reception of prescribed medications and dietary supplements stable and not to change their lifestyle habits (e.g. other dietary habits besides fish consumption, physical activity habits or sleep habits) during the intervention. After a 6-week wash-out period (no fish consumption), participants will cross over to the other intervention arm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation at 8 weeks
Time Frame: 0 (baseline) and 8 weeks
Efficiency concentration fifty of adenosine diphosphate-induced platelet aggregation (microM) will be assessed by light transmittance aggregometry
0 (baseline) and 8 weeks
Change from baseline of platelet activating factor-induced platelet aggregation at 8 weeks
Time Frame: 0 (baseline) and 8 weeks
Efficiency concentration fifty of platelet activating factor-induced platelet aggregation (microM) will be assessed by light transmittance aggregometry
0 (baseline) and 8 weeks
Change from baseline of thrombin-induced platelet aggregation at 8 weeks
Time Frame: 0 (baseline) and 8 weeks
Efficiency concentration fifty of thrombin-induced platelet aggregation (microM) will be assessed by light transmittance aggregometry
0 (baseline) and 8 weeks
Change from baseline in of plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 activity at 8 weeks
Time Frame: 0 (baseline) and 8 weeks
Plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 activity (mAU/mL) will be measured in blood samples using commercially available ELISA kits
0 (baseline) and 8 weeks
Change from baseline in soluble P-selectin levels at 8 weeks
Time Frame: 0 (baseline) and 8 weeks
Soluble P-selectin levels (ng/mL) will be measured in blood samples using commercially available ELISA kits
0 (baseline) and 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Harokopio University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Nireus Aquaculture

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 30, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 28, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 9, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 9, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 9, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 25/07/2012

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified individual participant data will be shared to investigators for the purpose of individual participant data meta-analysis, provided that the proposed use of the data has been approved by the Study Principal Investigator. Proposals should be directed to antonop@hua.gr. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings