Resynchronization in Patients With HF in AF Trial Undergoing Pace & AVNA Strategy With LBBAP Compared With BiV Pacing (RAFT-P&A)
Resynchronization in Patients With Ambulatory Heart Failure in Atrial Fibrillation Trial Undergoing Pace and Atrioventricular Node Ablation Strategy With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Compared With Biventricular Pacing
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Abbie Barron
- Phone Number: 86459 519-661-2111
- Email: abbie.barron@lhsc.on.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
London, Ontario, Canada
- London Health Sciences Centre
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) where AVNA is being considered with or without a pacemaker
- Are on optimal heart failure therapies for ≥4 weeks
- NYHA class I-IVa
Patients deemed not appropriate for rhythm control strategy (only for rate control strategy).
- Failed Ablation (≥1 failed ablation attempt)
- Refractory or intolerant to Antiarrhythmic drugs AADs or rate control medications
- Patient choice not to have rhythm control strategies
- Being considered for AVNA
- Patients with baseline NT-proBNP>600 or >400 if HF hospitalization within 12 months.
Exclusion Criteria:
- In-hospital patients with acute cardiac or non-cardiac illness that requires intensive care
- Acute coronary syndrome (including MI) or Coronary revascularization (CABG or PCI) <3 months
- Uncorrected or uncorrectable primary moderate to severe valvular disease
- TAVI < 3 months
- Restrictive, or reversible form of cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis
- Severe primary pulmonary disease such as cor pulmonale, irreversible lung disease requiring inhalers, oxygen supplementation
- Pulmonary hypertension (Mean pulmonary pressure is ≥35 mm Hg)
- Patients with a life expectancy of less than one year from non-cardiac cause
- Patients included in other clinical trials that will affect the objectives of this study or have competing interests
- Those unable or unwilling to provide informed consent unless supported by legal power of attorney
- Active malignancy with likelihood of survival <1 year
- NYHA class IVb
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy + AV node ablation
The active comparator group will be treated with CRT followed by an Atrioventricular Node Ablation.
|
The patients will be allocated by randomization to receive the intervention of CRT.
AV node ablation after 4 weeks of CRT implant or LBBAP implant.
|
|
Experimental: Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing + AV node ablation
The experimental group will be treated with LBBAP followed by an Atrioventricular Node Ablation.
|
AV node ablation after 4 weeks of CRT implant or LBBAP implant.
The patients will be allocated by randomization to receive the intervention of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in NT-proBNP from baseline to 6-month follow-up
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months
|
Comparison between NT-proBNP measurement at baseline and 6-month follow-up
|
baseline and 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Event rates of the composite outcome of heart failure events and all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 12 months
|
HF and mortality data will be collected throughout the duration of the study
|
12 months
|
|
Change in QoL - MLHFQ
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score is used to measure quality of life.
The MLHFQ consists of 21 questions answered on a 0-5 likert scale, with higher scores indicating a stronger impact of heart failure on QoL.
|
baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
|
Change in QoL - KCCQ
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (Kansas City) (KCCQ-12) measures how heart failure impacts a patient's quality of life.
The questionnaire measures frequency and burden of heart failure symptoms as well as physical and social limitations related to heart failure using a likert scale of 0-100, with higher scores indicating better health.
|
baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
|
Change in QoL - EQ-5D
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
EuroQol- 5 Dimension measures health related quality of life using a Level 1-5 component scale.
A lower score indicates better health related quality of life.
The EQ-5D also contains the EQ VAS, a 0-100 self reported scale where 100 indicates best health imaginable.
|
baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
|
Change 6MWT distance
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Change in distance walked in the 6MWT from baseline to 6-month and 12-month follow-up
|
baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
|
Change in echocardiogram parameters - Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume index (LVESVi)
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Compared from baseline to 6-month and 12-month follow-up.
A lower LVESVi indicates a trend towards normal volumes and a higher LVESVi indicates ventricle dilation compared to the normal population.
|
baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
|
Change in echocardiogram parameters - Left Ventricle (LV) Global Longitudinal strain
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Compared from baseline to 6-month and 12-month follow-up.
A lower LV Global Longitudinal strain indicates stronger left ventricular contraction.
|
baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
|
Change in echocardiogram parameters - Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Compared from baseline to 6-month and 12-month follow-up.
An increase in LVEF indicates stronger function of the left ventricle.
|
baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
|
Radiation exposure at device implant
Time Frame: During Surgical Intervention
|
Exposure time collected at device implant visits
|
During Surgical Intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Habib Khan, MBBS, PhD, London Health Sciences Centre
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 3819
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.