- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05428787
Resynchronization in Patients With HF in AF Trial Undergoing Pace & AVNA Strategy With LBBAP Compared With BiV Pacing (RAFT-P&A)
January 14, 2023 updated by: Habib Khan
Resynchronization in Patients With Ambulatory Heart Failure in Atrial Fibrillation Trial Undergoing Pace and Atrioventricular Node Ablation Strategy With Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Compared With Biventricular Pacing
This trial will compare two management strategies for HF patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
The active control group will undergo BiV pacing, followed by an AV node ablation.
The experimental group will undergo LBBAP, followed by an AV node ablation.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a prospective, randomized, double blind, control trial with follow up visits at 6- and 12-months following randomization.
Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 allocation to either the control group [optimal medical therapy (OMT) + CRT + ANVA] or the treatment group [OMT + LBBAP + ANVA].
Randomization will be stratified by site and LVEF.
In each group, the patient will undergo the pacing procedure (CRT or LBBAP) within 10 working days of randomization.
They will be assessed by a physician one week after the CRT procedure, and if eligible, they will undergo an AVNA within 1-4 weeks.
Success of these treatment plans will be evaluated primarily based on the change in NT-proBNP from baseline to 6- and 12-month follow ups.
At baseline and follow up visits study staff and physicians will collect participants' medical history, complete a Physical Exam and an NYHA Class Assessment, a medication assessment, and a 6 Minute Walk Test.
Participants will also be asked to complete Quality of Life Questionnaires (Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score, KCCQ and EQ-5D-5L), have an ECG and TTE performed if they have not had one performed recently, non- invasive hemodynamic measurements (if available), and complete routine bloodwork and an NT-proBNP test.
The adequacy of HF treatment will be assessed clinically, and medications optimized and recorded.
Device diagnostics will be assessed and recorded as to whether there are arrhythmias and to determine the appropriateness of device programming.
Secondary study outcomes include QoL scores (MLHFQ, KCCQ and EQ-5D), as well as 6MWT distance, and change in echocardiogram parameters (including change in LVESV index from baseline, change in global longitudinal LV systolic strain from baseline, and change in LVEF from baseline at 6-month and 12-month followup).
Secondary outcomes also include radiation exposure between LBBAP and CRT, feasibility of achieving conduction system pacing with LBBAP compared to CRT, and acute and long-term hemodynamic change due to either CRT or LBBAP (i.e., non-invasive hemodynamic measurements before and after AV node ablation including systolic BP, diastolic BP, cardiac output, stroke volume, total peripheral resistance, and pulse pressure).
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
284
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Abbie Barron
- Phone Number: 86459 519-661-2111
- Email: abbie.barron@lhsc.on.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
London, Ontario, Canada
- Recruiting
- London Health Sciences Centre
-
Contact:
- Sabrina Wall
- Phone Number: 34008 (519) 685-8500
- Email: sabrina.wall@lhsc.on.ca
-
Principal Investigator:
- Habib Khan, MBBS, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) where AVNA is being considered with or without a pacemaker
- Are on optimal heart failure therapies for ≥4 weeks
- NYHA class I-IVa
Patients deemed not appropriate for rhythm control strategy (only for rate control strategy).
- Failed Ablation (≥1 failed ablation attempt)
- Refractory or intolerant to Antiarrhythmic drugs AADs or rate control medications
- Patient choice not to have rhythm control strategies
- Being considered for AVNA
- Patients with baseline NT-proBNP>600 or >400 if HF hospitalization within 12 months.
Exclusion Criteria:
- In-hospital patients with acute cardiac or non-cardiac illness that requires intensive care
- Acute coronary syndrome (including MI) or Coronary revascularization (CABG or PCI) <3 months
- Uncorrected or uncorrectable primary moderate to severe valvular disease
- TAVI < 3 months
- Restrictive, or reversible form of cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis
- Severe primary pulmonary disease such as cor pulmonale, irreversible lung disease requiring inhalers, oxygen supplementation
- Pulmonary hypertension (Mean pulmonary pressure is ≥35 mm Hg)
- Patients with a life expectancy of less than one year from non-cardiac cause
- Patients included in other clinical trials that will affect the objectives of this study or have competing interests
- Those unable or unwilling to provide informed consent unless supported by legal power of attorney
- Active malignancy with likelihood of survival <1 year
- NYHA class IVb
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy + AV node ablation
The active comparator group will be treated with CRT followed by an Atrioventricular Node Ablation.
|
The patients will be allocated by randomization to receive the intervention of CRT.
AV node ablation after 4 weeks of CRT implant or LBBAP implant.
|
Experimental: Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing + AV node ablation
The experimental group will be treated with LBBAP followed by an Atrioventricular Node Ablation.
|
AV node ablation after 4 weeks of CRT implant or LBBAP implant.
The patients will be allocated by randomization to receive the intervention of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in NT-proBNP from baseline to 6-month follow-up
Time Frame: baseline and 6 months
|
Comparison between NT-proBNP measurement at baseline and 6-month follow-up
|
baseline and 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Event rates of the composite outcome of heart failure events and all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 12 months
|
HF and mortality data will be collected throughout the duration of the study
|
12 months
|
Change in QoL - MLHFQ
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score is used to measure quality of life.
The MLHFQ consists of 21 questions answered on a 0-5 likert scale, with higher scores indicating a stronger impact of heart failure on QoL.
|
baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Change in QoL - KCCQ
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (Kansas City) (KCCQ-12) measures how heart failure impacts a patient's quality of life.
The questionnaire measures frequency and burden of heart failure symptoms as well as physical and social limitations related to heart failure using a likert scale of 0-100, with higher scores indicating better health.
|
baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Change in QoL - EQ-5D
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
EuroQol- 5 Dimension measures health related quality of life using a Level 1-5 component scale.
A lower score indicates better health related quality of life.
The EQ-5D also contains the EQ VAS, a 0-100 self reported scale where 100 indicates best health imaginable.
|
baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Change 6MWT distance
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Change in distance walked in the 6MWT from baseline to 6-month and 12-month follow-up
|
baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Change in echocardiogram parameters - Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume index (LVESVi)
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Compared from baseline to 6-month and 12-month follow-up.
A lower LVESVi indicates a trend towards normal volumes and a higher LVESVi indicates ventricle dilation compared to the normal population.
|
baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Change in echocardiogram parameters - Left Ventricle (LV) Global Longitudinal strain
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Compared from baseline to 6-month and 12-month follow-up.
A lower LV Global Longitudinal strain indicates stronger left ventricular contraction.
|
baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Change in echocardiogram parameters - Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame: baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Compared from baseline to 6-month and 12-month follow-up.
An increase in LVEF indicates stronger function of the left ventricle.
|
baseline, 6 months and 12 months
|
Radiation exposure at device implant
Time Frame: During Surgical Intervention
|
Exposure time collected at device implant visits
|
During Surgical Intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Habib Khan, MBBS, PhD, London Health Sciences Centre
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 26, 2022
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
July 1, 2023
Study Completion (Anticipated)
July 1, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 10, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 17, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
June 23, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 18, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 14, 2023
Last Verified
January 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 3819
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
No
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Failure
-
Tufts Medical CenterMetro West Medical CenterCompletedCongestive Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure NYHA Class II | Heart Failure NYHA Class III | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure NYHA Class IV | Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure...United States, Canada
-
Manipal UniversityUnknownHeart Failure | Decompensated Heart Failure | Acute Heart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureIndia
-
VA Eastern Colorado Health Care SystemNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure | Heart Failure, Diastolic | Heart Failure, Systolic | Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction | Heart Failure; With Decompensation | Heart Failure,Congestive | Heart Failure AcuteUnited States
-
University Hospital, MontpellierCompletedHeart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart Failure Stage CFrance
-
Lancaster General HospitalLouise von Hess Medical Research InstituteEnrolling by invitationDiastolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
Wake Forest UniversityCompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction
-
Wake Forest UniversityNational Institute on Aging (NIA)CompletedHeart Failure, Congestive | Diastolic Heart FailureUnited States
-
US Department of Veterans AffairsCompleted
-
Giresun UniversityIstanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)RecruitingHeart Failure | Diastolic Heart Failure | Systolic Heart FailureTurkey
Clinical Trials on CRT
-
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureMedtronicCompleted
-
Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaThe Hilda & Preston Davis FoundationCompleted
-
Inova Health Care ServicesMedtronicRecruitingLeft Bundle-Branch Block | Heart Failure (HF) | Left Ventricular Ejection FractionUnited States
-
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustKing's College LondonNot yet recruiting
-
University Hospital OlomoucNot yet recruiting
-
CMC Ambroise ParéWithdrawnCompare Two Programming Modalities for CRT Devices in Heart Failure Patients With an Indication for Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyMonaco, France
-
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureCompletedHeart Diseases | Atrioventricular BlockUnited States, Canada
-
Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart FailureTerminatedCongestive Heart Failure | Systolic Heart Failure | Left Bundle Branch BlockUnited States, Sweden, India, Russian Federation, United Kingdom
-
Montreal Heart InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Abbott Medical DevicesTerminated
-
Medtronic Bakken Research CenterMedtronicTerminatedHeart Failure, CongestiveGermany