Effects of Perioperative Transauricular Vagus Nerve Electrical Stimulation on POD, POCD and CPSP
Effects of Perioperative Transauricular Vagus Nerve Electrical Stimulation on Postoperative Delirium, Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction and Chronic Postsurgical Pain in Patients Undergoing Arthroplasty.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Rui Yao, Maser
- Phone Number: +86 18761341804
- Email: yaorui_edu@163.com
Study Locations
-
-
Jiangsu
-
Changzhou, Jiangsu, China, 221009
- Xuzhou Central Hospital
-
Contact:
- Xianchi Li, PhD
- Phone Number: +86-0516-83956044
- Email: xzzxyykjk@163.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 50 to 80 years old.
- ASA grade I-Ⅲ.
- elective knee or hip replacement.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score < 23.
- Education years<7.
- Peptic ulcer disease, serious cardiac-cerebral vascular disease.
- Neurological or psychiatric disorders.
- History of drug and alcohol abuse.
- Hepatic and/or kidney dysfunction.
- BMI>35.
- Patients on antidepressants.
- ASA >Ⅲ.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: QUADRUPLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Experimental group
The transaricular vagus nerve stimulator was placed in the left ear trunk, which is dominated only by the auricular branch of the vagus nerve.
Continuous stimulation was performed at a frequency of 25Hz with pulse width of 300 μs.
The stimulation was adjusted to be higher than the perception threshold and lower than the pain threshold.
Each stimulation lasted for 30 minutes, three times per day (morning, noon, evening), from 1 day before surgery to 7 days after surgery, and the treatment lasted for 9 consecutive days.
|
The transaricular vagus nerve stimulator was placed in the left ear trunk, which is dominated only by the auricular branch of the vagus nerve.
Continuous stimulation was performed at a frequency of 25Hz with pulse width of 300 μs.
The stimulation was adjusted to be higher than the perception threshold and lower than the pain threshold.
Each stimulation lasted for 30 minutes, three times per day (morning, noon, evening), from 1 day before surgery to 7 days after surgery, and the treatment lasted for 9 consecutive days.
|
|
SHAM_COMPARATOR: Control group
The transaricular vagus nerve stimulator was placed in the same position as the experimental group, covered with an insulating film and placed at the site of the stimulation, so that the patient could not actually receive the electrical stimulation.
Continuous stimulation was performed at a frequency of 25Hz and pulse width of 300 μs, and the stimulation was adjusted to be higher than the perception threshold and lower than the pain threshold.
Each stimulation lasted for 30 minutes, three times per day (morning, noon, evening), from 1 day before surgery to 7 days after surgery, for 9 consecutive days.
|
The transaricular vagus nerve stimulator was placed in the same position as the experimental group, covered with an insulating film and placed at the site of the stimulation, so that the patient could not actually receive the electrical stimulation.
Continuous stimulation was performed at a frequency of 25Hz and pulse width of 300 μs, and the stimulation was adjusted to be higher than the perception threshold and lower than the pain threshold.
Each stimulation lasted for 30 minutes, three times per day (morning, noon, evening), from 1 day before surgery to 7 days after surgery, for 9 consecutive days.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative cognitive function
Time Frame: 1 month after the surgery.
|
The incidence of POCD was compared between the experimental group and the control group.The preoperative and postoperative differences of the following scales were calculated and compared: Digit Span (forward and backward), Visual Retention and Paired Associate Verbal Learning subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scale, Digit Symbol subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence ScaleRevised, Halstead-Reitan Trail Making Test (Part A), Corsi Block Test and Grooved Pegboard Test (favored and unfavored hand).
The standard deviation (SD) for each test was computed from the preoperative scores.
A participant whose postoperative performance declined by ≥1 SD as compared to each preoperative test score on ≥2 tests was classified as POCD.
|
1 month after the surgery.
|
|
Postoperative cognitive function
Time Frame: 3 months after the surgery.
|
The incidence of POCD was compared between the experimental group and the control group.The preoperative and postoperative differences of the following scales were calculated and compared: Digit Span (forward and backward), Visual Retention and Paired Associate Verbal Learning subtests of the Wechsler Memory Scale, Digit Symbol subtest of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence ScaleRevised, Halstead-Reitan Trail Making Test (Part A), Corsi Block Test and Grooved Pegboard Test (favored and unfavored hand).
The standard deviation (SD) for each test was computed from the preoperative scores.
A participant whose postoperative performance declined by ≥1 SD as compared to each preoperative test score on ≥2 tests was classified as POCD.
|
3 months after the surgery.
|
|
Postoperative delirium
Time Frame: Consecutive 7 days after the surgery
|
The incidence of POD was compared between the experimental group and the control group.Postoperative delirium was assessed by the Delirium Assessment Scale (CAM-ICU)
|
Consecutive 7 days after the surgery
|
|
Acute postoperative pain
Time Frame: Consecutive 7 days after the surgery for acute pain
|
The incidence of acute postoperative pain was compared between the experimental group and the control group.Acute postoperative pain was assessed by Visual Analogue Scale(VAS) for 7 consecutive days within 1 week after surgery.
|
Consecutive 7 days after the surgery for acute pain
|
|
Chronic Postsurgical pain
Time Frame: 3 months after the surgery for chronic pain
|
The incidence of chronic postoperative pain (CPSP) was assessed by the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) and Neuropathic Pain Scale (NPS).The incidence of CPSP was compared between the experimental group and the control group.
|
3 months after the surgery for chronic pain
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
TNF-α level in peripheral venous blood
Time Frame: 1 day before the surgery, Postoperative day 1, 3, 5
|
The incidence of TNF-α level (pg/ml) in peripheral venous blood was compared between the experimental group and the control group
|
1 day before the surgery, Postoperative day 1, 3, 5
|
|
IL-6 level in peripheral venous blood
Time Frame: 1 day before the surgery, Postoperative day 1, 3, 5
|
The incidence of IL-6 level (pg/ml) in peripheral venous blood was compared between the experimental group and the control group
|
1 day before the surgery, Postoperative day 1, 3, 5
|
|
IL-1β level in peripheral venous blood
Time Frame: 1 day before the surgery, Postoperative day 1, 3, 5
|
The incidence of IL-1β level (pg/ml) in peripheral venous blood was compared between the experimental group and the control group
|
1 day before the surgery, Postoperative day 1, 3, 5
|
|
cortisol level in peripheral venous blood
Time Frame: 1 day before the surgery, Postoperative day 1, 3, 5
|
The incidence of cortisol level (μg/dL) in peripheral venous blood was compared between the experimental group and the control group
|
1 day before the surgery, Postoperative day 1, 3, 5
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Chair: Junli Cao, PhD & MD, Xuzhou Medical University
- Study Chair: Daqing Ma, PhD & MD, Imperial College London
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Glare P, Aubrey KR, Myles PS. Transition from acute to chronic pain after surgery. Lancet. 2019 Apr 13;393(10180):1537-1546. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30352-6.
- Lavand'homme P. Transition from acute to chronic pain after surgery. Pain. 2017 Apr;158 Suppl 1:S50-S54. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000809. No abstract available.
- Hovens IB, Schoemaker RG, van der Zee EA, Absalom AR, Heineman E, van Leeuwen BL. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction: Involvement of neuroinflammation and neuronal functioning. Brain Behav Immun. 2014 May;38:202-10. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2014.02.002. Epub 2014 Feb 8.
- Eckenhoff RG, Maze M, Xie Z, Culley DJ, Goodlin SJ, Zuo Z, Wei H, Whittington RA, Terrando N, Orser BA, Eckenhoff MF. Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorder: State of the Preclinical Science. Anesthesiology. 2020 Jan;132(1):55-68. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002956.
- Jin Z, Hu J, Ma D. Postoperative delirium: perioperative assessment, risk reduction, and management. Br J Anaesth. 2020 Oct;125(4):492-504. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2020.06.063. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
- Mohanty R, Lindroth H, Twadell S, Nair VA, Prabhakaran V, Sanders RD. A pilot study of neural correlates of perioperative executive function associated with noncardiac surgery in the elderly. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Nov;123(5):e517-e518. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Aug 30. No abstract available.
- Zhu Y, Zhou M, Jia X, Zhang W, Shi Y, Bai S, Rampes S, Vizcaychipi MP, Wu C, Wang K, Ma D, Yang Q, Wang L. Inflammation Disrupts the Brain Network of Executive Function After Cardiac Surgery. Ann Surg. 2021 Jul 2. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005041. Online ahead of print.
- Liu CH, Yang MH, Zhang GZ, Wang XX, Li B, Li M, Woelfer M, Walter M, Wang L. Neural networks and the anti-inflammatory effect of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation in depression. J Neuroinflammation. 2020 Feb 12;17(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12974-020-01732-5.
- Huffman WJ, Subramaniyan S, Rodriguiz RM, Wetsel WC, Grill WM, Terrando N. Modulation of neuroinflammation and memory dysfunction using percutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in mice. Brain Stimul. 2019 Jan-Feb;12(1):19-29. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
- Redgrave J, Day D, Leung H, Laud PJ, Ali A, Lindert R, Majid A. Safety and tolerability of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve stimulation in humans; a systematic review. Brain Stimul. 2018 Nov-Dec;11(6):1225-1238. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.08.010. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
- Farmer AD, Strzelczyk A, Finisguerra A, Gourine AV, Gharabaghi A, Hasan A, Burger AM, Jaramillo AM, Mertens A, Majid A, Verkuil B, Badran BW, Ventura-Bort C, Gaul C, Beste C, Warren CM, Quintana DS, Hammerer D, Freri E, Frangos E, Tobaldini E, Kaniusas E, Rosenow F, Capone F, Panetsos F, Ackland GL, Kaithwas G, O'Leary GH, Genheimer H, Jacobs HIL, Van Diest I, Schoenen J, Redgrave J, Fang J, Deuchars J, Szeles JC, Thayer JF, More K, Vonck K, Steenbergen L, Vianna LC, McTeague LM, Ludwig M, Veldhuizen MG, De Couck M, Casazza M, Keute M, Bikson M, Andreatta M, D'Agostini M, Weymar M, Betts M, Prigge M, Kaess M, Roden M, Thai M, Schuster NM, Montano N, Hansen N, Kroemer NB, Rong P, Fischer R, Howland RH, Sclocco R, Sellaro R, Garcia RG, Bauer S, Gancheva S, Stavrakis S, Kampusch S, Deuchars SA, Wehner S, Laborde S, Usichenko T, Polak T, Zaehle T, Borges U, Teckentrup V, Jandackova VK, Napadow V, Koenig J. International Consensus Based Review and Recommendations for Minimum Reporting Standards in Research on Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation (Version 2020). Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Mar 23;14:568051. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.568051. eCollection 2020.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ANTICIPATED)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- XuzhouCH20220620
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.