A Multilevel Intervention to Improve Adherence to Childhood Cancer Survivorship (BRIDGES)

August 19, 2025 updated by: Georgetown University

BRidging Information Divides and Gaps to Ensure Survivorship: the BRIDGES Randomized Controlled Trial of a Multilevel Intervention to Improve Adherence to Childhood Cancer Survivorship

More than 80% of childhood cancer survivors develop serious or life-threatening late effects after cancer therapy, but <20% receive recommended survivorship care offered at cancer center survivorship clinics. In a shared care model, the investigators propose to investigate an innovative multi-level intervention consisting of: 1) patient survivorship education via telehealth with the cancer center, 2) ongoing patient-tailored education program within the electronic health record patient portal, 3) a structured interactive phone communication between the cancer center and the primary care clinic, and 4) an in-person visit with the primary care clinic for survivorship care with the goal of achieving high rates of adherence to recommended surveillance for late effects, as well as improving patient and physician knowledge and self-efficacy. If this scalable intervention demonstrates patient completion of recommended care comparable to cancer center survivorship clinics, this innovative study has the enormous potential to deliver recommended care to a larger proportion of childhood cancer survivors and reduce survivorship care disparities, while engaging p to integrate survivorship care as part of overall, lifelong health maintenance.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

More than 80% of childhood cancer survivors (CCS) develop serious or life-threatening late effects. Yet <20% of CCS receive recommended survivorship care, despite the availability of consensus guidelines for lifelong surveillance for late effects starting 2 years post-therapy. The "gold standard" cancer center-based survivorship clinic provides high-quality care to CCS who attend, but patients avoid reminders of their past cancer and lack knowledge and self-efficacy for survivorship care. Other barriers include travel distance, inadequate insurance, and out-of-pocket costs-these structural issues contribute to health disparities. Partnering with community primary care provider (PCP) clinics in a shared model of care is a promising strategy to overcome these barriers, but PCPs lack knowledge, self-efficacy, and interactive communication with the cancer center and are confused about the division of care responsibilities. This intervention is scalable and distance-based, is informed directly by patient and PCP barriers and preferences from previous studies, and is boosted by a nationwide explosion in telehealth services precipitated by the COVID-19 crisis. The proposed randomized controlled trial will enroll 240 CCS 2.0-4.0 years post-chemotherapy/radiation to investigate an innovative multi-level intervention (i.e., interpersonal and organizational levels) consisting of 1) patient survivorship education via telehealth with the cancer center, 2) ongoing patient-tailored education program within the electronic health record (EHR)'s patient portal, 3) a structured interactive phone communication between the cancer center and the PCP clinic (with 1-year follow-up call), and 4) an in-person visit with the PCP clinic for survivorship care. The comparison group will be randomized to an in-person visit with their cancer center survivorship clinic. This study includes 4 centers with high proportions of subgroups vulnerable to survivorship care disparities (i.e., rural, Black, Latinx, Spanish-speaking, socioeconomically disadvantaged). Both groups will be asked to begin recommended surveillance for late effects within 1-year post-randomization, separate from tumor recurrence monitoring by the primary oncologist. The Specific Aims are to Aim 1- Demonstrate patient completion of guideline-recommended surveillance tests in intervention participants is not inferior, i.e. within 10%, to that in the comparison group; Aim 2- Achieve greater 1) patient knowledge, self-efficacy, and activation and 2) PCP knowledge and self-efficacy with survivorship care among intervention participants and their PCPs compared to the comparison group; and Aim 3- Ascertain process outcomes for the 1) patient and 2) PCP clinic. Outcomes will also be assessed among subgroups with survivorship care disparities. Transformative Impact: If the intervention demonstrates patient completion of recommended survivorship care comparable to cancer center survivorship clinic, the study has the enormous potential to deliver recommended lifelong care to a larger proportion of CCS and reduce survivorship care ies, while engaging patients and PCPs to integrate survivorship care as part of overall, lifelong health maintenance.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
240

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Long Beach, California, United States, 90806
        • Memorialcare Miller Children's & Women's Hospital Long Beach
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Children's Hospital Colorado
    • New Jersey
      • Hackensack, New Jersey, United States, 07601
        • Hackensack University Medical Center
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27514
        • University of North Carolina Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosed with any cancer at age <21 years
  2. Treated with chemotherapy and/or radiation
  3. 2.0-4.0 years status post-completion of all cancer-related therapy
  4. Cancer-free with a life expectancy of ≥2 years
  5. English- or Spanish-speaking (also applies to parent/guardian if patient age <18 years)
  6. No previous attendance at a specialty survivorship clinic
  7. Followed at one of the 4 participating sites: Hackensack, University of North Carolina- Chapel Hill (UNC), University of Colorado Denver (CU), Miller's Children's and Women's Hospital Long Beach (MCWH)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active medical problems severe enough to not be eligible for receiving survivorship care with primary care provider at the time of recruitment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Multi-level Intervention of shared model of survivorship care
  1. Patient survivorship education via telehealth with the cancer center
  2. Ongoing patient-tailored education program by MyChart within the EHR patient portal
  3. Structured interactive phone communication between the research RN at the cancer center and community PCP clinic
  4. In-person visit with the PCP clinic for survivorship care.
Behavioral: Multi-level Intervention of shared model of survivorship care
1) Patient survivorship education via telehealth with the cancer center- The research registered nurse (RN) will discuss the contents of the survivorship care plan and coordination between the cancer center and PCP clinic. 2) Ongoing patient-tailored education program by MyChart within the EHR patient portal- Patients will be asked to select survivorship topics of interest from a panel (e.g. school issues, fertility, fatigue, physical activity, single kidney health, emotions/coping) that will then be sent over 1 year. 3) Structured interactive phone communication between the research RN at the cancer center and community PCP clinic- The discussion will explain the patient's cancer history, tumor recurrence monitoring schedule, individualized risk of late effects and surveillance schedule, psychosocial challenges, health behaviors, and coordination between the cancer center and PCP clinic. 4) In-person visit with the PCP clinic for survivorship care.
Active Comparator: "Gold standard" cancer center-based survivorship clinic
In-person visit at specialty survivorship clinic
Other: Comparison Group
Participants will be contacted by study staff at their cancer center to schedule an in-person visit at the survivorship clinic that will include a comprehensive history focused on cancer-related medical and psychosocial issues, physical examination, ordering of recommended surveillance for late effects, and delivery of hard copy of their survivorship care plan.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient completion of guideline-recommended surveillance tests for late effects of therapy
Time Frame: 1-year post-randomization
The investigators will assess adherence to surveillance recommended by the Children's Oncology Group Long-term Follow-up Guidelines. The primary analysis will be on tests completed by patients, and not just ordered by physicians, because that is the most meaningful indicator of patient adherence to guidelines
1-year post-randomization
Patient completion of guideline-recommended surveillance tests for late effects of therapy
Time Frame: 2 years post-randomization
The investigators will assess adherence to surveillance recommended by the Children's Oncology Group Long-term Follow-up Guidelines. The primary analysis will be on tests completed by patients, and not just ordered by physicians, because that is the most meaningful indicator of patient adherence to guidelines
2 years post-randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient Knowledge:
Time Frame: 1-year post-randomization
Patient Knowledge Survey developed by Kadan-Lottick et al. for the Childhood Cancer Survey Study which is a 9-item survey regarding treatment history, risk of late effects, need for survivorship care, and purpose of the survivorship care plan. Note that results will not be reported on a scale.
1-year post-randomization
Patient Knowledge:
Time Frame: 2-years post-randomization
Patient Knowledge Survey developed by Kadan-Lottick et al. for the Childhood Cancer Survey Study which is a 9-item survey regarding treatment history, risk of late effects, need for survivorship care, and purpose of the survivorship care plan. Note that results are not reported on a scale.
2-years post-randomization
Patient Healthcare Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 1-year post-randomization
Stanford Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scale (score range 1-10, higher score indicates greater self-efficacy) to be administered to patients and proxies
1-year post-randomization
Patient Healthcare Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 2-years post-randomization
Stanford Chronic Disease Self-Efficacy Scale (score range 1-10, higher score indicates greater self-efficacy) to be administered to patients and proxies
2-years post-randomization
Patient Activation
Time Frame: 1-year post-randomization
The 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM) will be administered to participants to evaluate the level of patient activation, i.e. patient self-reported knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-management of one's health or chronic condition. Scores range from 0-100 with higher scores reflecting greater patient activation.
1-year post-randomization
Patient Activation
Time Frame: 2-years post-randomization
The 13-item Patient Activation Measure (PAM) will be administered to participants to evaluate the level of patient activation, i.e. patient self-reported knowledge, skill, and confidence for self-management of one's health or chronic condition. Scores range from 0-100 with higher scores reflecting greater patient activation.
2-years post-randomization
PCP Knowledge and Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 1-year post-randomization
Survey consisting of questions regarding the PCPs' familiarity with the surveillance guidelines and confidence in providing survivorship care. Note that results are not reported on a scale.
1-year post-randomization
PCP Knowledge and Self-Efficacy
Time Frame: 2-years post-randomization
Survey consisting of questions regarding the PCPs' familiarity with the surveillance guidelines and confidence in providing survivorship care. Note that results are not reported on a scale.
2-years post-randomization
Process Outcomes for Patients
Time Frame: 1-year post-randomization
Patients will complete a survey regarding process outcomes (i.e., feasibility, fidelity, acceptability) associated with the multi-level intervention. Note that results are not reported on a scale.
1-year post-randomization
Process Outcomes for Primary Care Physicians
Time Frame: 1-year post-randomization
Primary care physicians will complete a survey regarding process outcomes (i.e., feasibility, fidelity, acceptability) associated with the multi-level intervention. Note that results are not reported on a scale.
1-year post-randomization

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-intervention qualitative interviews of participants and PCPs
Time Frame: 1-year post-randomization
The investigators will conduct semi-structured, qualitative interviews with 1) 40 intervention participants and 2) 40 PCP clinics to generate feedback regarding the intervention (e.g. timing, duration, usability). Interviews will explore acceptability of the intervention and how to improve intervention efficacy.
1-year post-randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Georgetown University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University of Colorado, Denver
NYU Langone Health
Seattle Children's Hospital
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Hackensack Meridian Health

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Nina Kadan-Lottick, MD, MSPH, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 28, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 4, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 20, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 19, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • R01CA261881 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The proposed research will include data from 240 survivors of childhood cancer. The dataset will include (1) demographic data; (2) cancer diagnosis and treatment data; (3) adherence to survivorship care data; (4) knowledge, self-efficacy, and activation data; and (5) process outcomes (feasibility, fidelity, acceptability) data. In compliance with the National Institutes of Health Principles and Guidelines document, the investigators will readily provide all relevant protocols, publications, and the underlying primary data (to the extent possible as guided by the IRB) supporting publications to other academic investigators upon request. To maintain the privacy of the human subjects, data will de-identified. Should any intellectual property arise that requires a patent, the investigators will ensure that the technology (materials and data) remains widely available to the academic research community.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After analysis and publication of data addressed in the the aims set forth in R01 CA261881

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Request to study investigators and compliance with all IRB and institutional data usage agreement requirements.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings