The Refreshing Older Adults' Driving Skills (ROADSkills) Program (ROADSkills)
Evaluating the Acceptability and Feasibility of an Evidence-based and User-informed Approach to Refreshing Older Adults' Driving Skills (ROADSkills)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Brenda H Vrkljan, PhD
- Phone Number: 905-745-3789
- Email: vrkljan@mcmaster.ca
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8P 0A6
- Recruiting
- McMaster Automotive Resource Centre
-
Contact:
- Jessica Petrunti, B.A.
- Phone Number: 905-525-9140
- Email: petruntij@mcmaster.ca
-
Principal Investigator:
- Brenda Vrkljan, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 65-79 to reduce co-intervention bias, as the Ministry of Transportation has a Senior Driver Renewal program that screens drivers aged 80 and older
- Hold a valid driver's license
- Owner and access to insured vehicle
- Speak and understand English fluently
- Visited an optometrist in last two years
- if corrective lens are required for driving, prescriptions should be up-to-date
Exclusion Criteria:
- If participated in a recent Randomized Controlled Trial that examined the effectiveness of video-based intervention, will be excluded due to potential for bias
- Known serious or terminal illness or presence of contraindications for driving
- Performance on cognitive screening: 1) score of < 21 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA; Nasreddine et al., 2005) 2) taking longer than 180 seconds or 3 or more errors on the Trail Making Test B (Bowie & Harvey, 2006).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention group
Participants in the intervention group will watch their respective training video individually approximately four to six weeks after their baseline visit.
Each training video will be 20-25 minutes in length where they will receive voice-over feedback on their driving from a member of the study team alongside video clips taken from the device of their behind-the-wheel performance.
They will also receive a written summary of their feedback to keep at the end of their feedback session.
|
Participants in the intervention arm of the study will watch a 30-minute personalized video on their driving that uses information compiled from a GPS device that will be installed in their vehicle during their baseline visit.
|
|
Active Comparator: Control group
Four to six weeks after their first baseline visit, control group participants individually will watch a 30-minute (generic) video that describes the benefits and challenges of aging-in-place that discusses the importance of community mobility in later life.
At the end of their session, participants will be given a government brochure on this topic.
|
Participants in active comparator arm of the study will watch a 30-min video and receive a written brochure that provide tips for maintaining a healthy lifestyle in later life, including the importance of community mobility.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
weighted electronic Driving Observation Schedule (eDOS)
Time Frame: 3 months
|
The weighted eDOS (Chen et al., 2020; Mazer et al., 2021) will be used to evaluate the behind-the-wheel performance of older drivers.
The weighted eDOS accounts for route complexity where a total score is calculated, as the sum of errors weighted for its risk level.
For each driving error, a weight is given (1=low risk; 2=moderate risk; 3=high risk) based on the type of error and the environment where it was made.
For example, no signal at intersection with only one lane in low speed is considered a low-risk error whereas an inappropriate gap when making a left turn across more than one lane of traffic is a high-risk error.
The weighted eDOS will be scored by a trained rater (blinded) using the GPS data of a 20-25- minute route.
The weighted eDOS emerged from research examining the real-world driving of older drivers and has good inter-rater reliability, internal consistency and ecological validity; acceptability among older drivers was high (Koppel et al., 2016; 2017).
|
3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Chen YT, Gelinas I, Mazer B. Development of a weighted scoring system for the Electronic Driving Observation Schedule (eDOS). MethodsX. 2020 Oct 12;7:101099. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.101099. eCollection 2020.
- Mazer B, Chen YT, Vrkljan B, Marshall SC, Charlton JL, Koppel S, Gelinas I. Comparison of older and middle-aged drivers' driving performance in a naturalistic setting. Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Oct;161:106343. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106343. Epub 2021 Aug 18.
- Koppel S, Charlton JL, Langford J, Di Stefano M, MacDonald W, Vlahodimitrakou Z, Mazer BL, Gelinas I, Vrkljan B, Eliasz K, Myers A, Tuokko HA, Marshall SC. Driving Task: How Older Drivers' On-Road Driving Performance Relates to Abilities, Perceptions, and Restrictions. Can J Aging. 2016 Jun;35 Suppl 1:15-31. doi: 10.1017/S0714980816000015. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
- Koppel S, Charlton JL, Richter N, Di Stefano M, Macdonald W, Darzins P, Newstead SV, D'Elia A, Mazer B, Gelinas I, Vrkljan B, Eliasz K, Myers A, Marshall S. Are older drivers' on-road driving error rates related to functional performance and/or self-reported driving experiences? Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jun;103:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.006. Epub 2017 Mar 31. No abstract available.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 14707
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.