Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy With Complete Mesocolic Excision
Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy With Complete Mesocolic Excision: a Retrospective Multicenter Study With Propensity Score Matching
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Chongqing
-
Wanzhou, Chongqing, China, 404031
- Chongqing University Three Gorges Hospital
-
Yuzhong, Chongqing, China, 400042
- Army Medical Center
-
-
Gansu
-
Lanzhou, Gansu, China, 730050
- No. 940 Hospital of Joint Logistics Support Foce of Chinese People's Liberation Army
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adenocarcinoma was confirmed by preoperative colonoscopy and it was located in the right colon.
- Preoperative enhanced abdominal CT examination showed no invasion of abdominal wall or adjacent organs.
- The patient underwent robotic or laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Multiple primary colorectal tumors
- Metastasis to abdominal
- Pelvic or distant organs
- Accompanied with bowel obstruction or perforation
- Neuroendocrine tumors
- Lymphomas
- Other malignant tumors.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Retrospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
robotic right hemicolectomy with CME
The robot was set to come and dock from the right shoulder of the patient.
Three robotic 8-mm trocars (R1, R2 and R3) and two 12-mm trocars (camera and assistant port) were used for the robotic procedure.
One working arm carrying a monopolar cautery hook/scissors for dissection was located in the left upper quadrant port (R1).
The other two working arms carried bipolar forceps in the suprapubic port (R2), and Cadiere's fenestrated forceps in the right lower quadrant port (R3) that was used to keep the superior mesenteric axis in traction.
After gentle cephalad traction on the transverse mesocolon with the grasp in R3, the assistant grasped the ileocecal valve through the assistant port to put the ileocolic vascular pedicle on tension and the ileocolic vessels were identified and lifted up with R2.
All procedures were performed keeping the principle of complete mesocolic excision.
|
The distribution of trocars was placed according to the position of Intuitive Surgical Inc. for robotic colectomy.
The robot was set to come and dock from theright shoulder of the patient.
Three robotic 8-mm trocars (R1, R2 and R3) and two 12-mm trocars (camera and assistant port) were used for the robotic procedure.
One working arm carrying a monopolar cautery hook for dissection was located in the left upper quadrant port (R1).
The other two working arms carried bipolar forceps in the suprapubic port (R3), and Cadiere's fenestrated forceps in the right lower quadrant port (R2) that was used to keep the superior mesenteric axis in traction.
After gentle cephalad traction on the transversemesocolon with the grasp in R2, the assistant grasped the ileocecal valve through the assistant port to put the ileocolic vascular pedicle on tension and the ileocolic vessels were identified and lifted up with R3.
|
|
laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with CME
In the aparoscopic group, five trocars were used: a periumbilical incision and left upper quadrant for 12-mm trocars, both lower quadrants for 5-mm trocars, and the right quadrant for one more 5-mm trocar.
A 30 degrees laparoscope was inserted through the periumbilical trocar site.
After insertion of the trocars, the patient was placed in the Trendelenburg position with a 15 degrees rightward tilt.
An ultrasonic device was used for dissection.
All procedures were performed keeping the principle of complete mesocolic excision.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
diseasefree survival(months)
Time Frame: until July 2021
|
Collect outcomes of follow-up and use Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to analyze it.
|
until July 2021
|
|
overall survival(months)
Time Frame: until July 2021
|
Collect outcomes of follow-up and use Kaplan-Meier survival analysis to analyze it.
|
until July 2021
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
conversion rates
Time Frame: during the surgery
|
the incidence of a conversion to open surgery
|
during the surgery
|
|
operative time
Time Frame: during the surgery
|
the miniutes of surgery from skin to skin
|
during the surgery
|
|
estimated blood loss
Time Frame: during the surgery
|
the mililiter of the blood loss during surgery
|
during the surgery
|
|
oral retake
Time Frame: up to 30 days after surgery
|
the patients begin to recover intake
|
up to 30 days after surgery
|
|
time to return to bowel function
Time Frame: up to 30 days after surgery
|
the patients begin to recover bowel function
|
up to 30 days after surgery
|
|
length of stay
Time Frame: up to 30 days after surgery
|
the days of hospital stay
|
up to 30 days after surgery
|
|
total hospitalization cost
Time Frame: up to 30 days after surgery
|
the total cost of this treatment by RMB
|
up to 30 days after surgery
|
|
complications
Time Frame: up to 30 days after surgery
|
Postoperative complications, such as ileus, anastomotic leak, small intestinal obstruction, bleeding and so on.
Number of Participants with complications will be recorded.
|
up to 30 days after surgery
|
|
harvest lymph nodes
Time Frame: up to 7 days after surgery
|
the number of harvest lymph nodes in postoperative pathological report
|
up to 7 days after surgery
|
|
lymph node metastasis
Time Frame: up to 7 days after surgery
|
the number of patients with lymph node metastasis
|
up to 7 days after surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Yozgatli TK, Aytac E, Ozben V, Bayram O, Gurbuz B, Baca B, Balik E, Hamzaoglu I, Karahasanoglu T, Bugra D. Robotic Complete Mesocolic Excision Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hemicolectomy for Right-Sided Colon Cancer. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2019 May;29(5):671-676. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0348. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
- Ferri V, Quijano Y, Nuñez J, Caruso R, Duran H, Diaz E, Fabra I, Malave L, Isernia R, d'Ovidio A, Agresott R, Gomez P, Isojo R, Vicente E. Robotic-assisted right colectomy versus laparoscopic approach: case-matched study and cost-effectiveness analysis. J Robot Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):115-123. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01084-5. Epub 2020 May 4.
- Spinoglio G, Bianchi PP, Marano A, Priora F, Lenti LM, Ravazzoni F, Petz W, Borin S, Ribero D, Formisano G, Bertani E. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Right Colectomy with Complete Mesocolic Excision for the Treatment of Colon Cancer: Perioperative Outcomes and 5-Year Survival in a Consecutive Series of 202 Patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov;25(12):3580-3586. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6752-7. Epub 2018 Sep 14. Erratum in: Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(Suppl 3):884.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20220623
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.