Validation the Artificial Intelligence System for Automatic Evaluation of the Extent of Intestinal Metaplasia

November 27, 2024 updated by: Yanqing Li, Shandong University

Validation the Artificial Intelligence System for Automatic Evaluation of the Extent of

The operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia assessment (OLGIM) staging systems using biopsy specimens were commonly used for histological assessment of gastric cancer risk. But its clinical application is limited for at least biopsy samples. The endoscopic grading system (EGGIM) has been shown a significant correlation with the OLGIM. The investigators designed a computer-aided diagnosis program using deep neural network to automatically evaluate the extent of IM and calculate the EGGIM scores in endoscopy examination. This study is aimed at exploring the relevance of the EGGIM scores automatically evaluated by Artificial Intelligence and OLGIM scores.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Gastric intestinal metaplasia(GIM) is an important stage in the gastric cancer(GC). The operative link on gastric intestinal metaplasia assessment (OLGIM) staging systems using biopsy specimens were commonly used for histological assessment of gastric cancer risk. However, its need to take at least 4 biopsies is not clinically feasible. The endoscopic grading system (EGGIM) has been shown a significant correlation with the OLGIM. An EGGIM score of 5 was the best cut off value for identifying OLGIM stage III/IV patients. The investigators have designed a computer-aided diagnosis program using deep neural network to automatically evaluate the extent of IM and calculate the EGGIM scores in endoscopy examination. This study is aimed at exploring the relevance of the EGGIM scores automatically evaluated by Artificial Intelligence and OLGIM scores.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1080

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250012
        • Department of Gastrology, QiLu Hospital, Shandong University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Consecutive patients who receive the gastrointestinal endoscopy examination and screened that fulfill the eligibility criteria at Qilu Hospital, Shandong University will be enrolled into the study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients aged 40-75 years who undergo the IEE examination

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with severe cardiac, cerebral, pulmonary or renal dysfunction or psychiatric
  • disorders who cannot participate in gastroscopy
  • patients with previous surgical procedures on the stomach
  • patients with contraindications to biopsy
  • patients who refuse to sign the informed consent form

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Gastric intestinal metaplasia observed by IEE
Get pictures from gastric antrum body and angle by image-enhanced endoscopy in order to calculate the EGGIM score.
Diagnostic test: The diagnosis of Artificial Intelligence and endosopists
Endosopists and AI will assess the EGGIM score independently when the patients is eligible. In addition, they can not see the OLGIM score of the patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of AI model to diagnose extensive intestinal metaplasia (OLGIM stage III/IV) by calculating the EGGIM score
Time Frame: 2 years
A scale for endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia (EGGIM) varies from 0 (normal endoscopy with no areas suggestive of intestinal metaplasia) to 10 (diffuse metaplasia in all gastric areas). Five different areas were considered (two areas in the antrum, two in the corpus, and one in the incisura). Each area was scored 0 (no intestinal metaplasia), 1 (focal intestinal metaplasia, ≤30 % of the area), or 2 points (extensive intestinal metaplasia in that area, > 30 % of the area), giving a possible total of 10 points. The higher the score, the more severe the degree of intestinal metaplasia, and the higher the risk of gastric cancer in patients.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of experienced endoscopists to diagnose extensive intestinal metaplasia (OLGIM stage III/IV) by calculating the EGGIM score
Time Frame: 2 years
A scale for endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia (EGGIM) varies from 0 (normal endoscopy with no areas suggestive of intestinal metaplasia) to 10 (diffuse metaplasia in all gastric areas). Five different areas were considered (two areas in the antrum, two in the corpus, and one in the incisura). Each area was scored 0 (no intestinal metaplasia), 1 (focal intestinal metaplasia, ≤30 % of the area), or 2 points (extensive intestinal metaplasia in that area, > 30 % of the area), giving a possible total of 10 points. The higher the score, the more severe the degree of intestinal metaplasia, and the higher the risk of gastric cancer in patients.
2 years
Accuracy of inexperienced endoscopists to diagnose extensive intestinal metaplasia (OLGIM stage III/IV) by calculating the EGGIM score
Time Frame: 2 years
A scale for endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia (EGGIM) varies from 0 (normal endoscopy with no areas suggestive of intestinal metaplasia) to 10 (diffuse metaplasia in all gastric areas). Five different areas were considered (two areas in the antrum, two in the corpus, and one in the incisura). Each area was scored 0 (no intestinal metaplasia), 1 (focal intestinal metaplasia, ≤30 % of the area), or 2 points (extensive intestinal metaplasia in that area, > 30 % of the area), giving a possible total of 10 points. The higher the score, the more severe the degree of intestinal metaplasia, and the higher the risk of gastric cancer in patients.
2 years
Inter-observer agreement among experienced endoscopists in identifying the EGGIM scores
Time Frame: 2 years
A scale for endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia (EGGIM) varies from 0 (normal endoscopy with no areas suggestive of intestinal metaplasia) to 10 (diffuse metaplasia in all gastric areas). Five different areas were considered (two areas in the antrum, two in the corpus, and one in the incisura). Each area was scored 0 (no intestinal metaplasia), 1 (focal intestinal metaplasia, ≤30 % of the area), or 2 points (extensive intestinal metaplasia in that area, > 30 % of the area), giving a possible total of 10 points. The higher the score, the more severe the degree of intestinal metaplasia, and the higher the risk of gastric cancer in patients.
2 years
Inter-observer agreement among inexperienced endoscopists in identifying the EGGIM scores
Time Frame: 2 years
A scale for endoscopic grading of gastric intestinal metaplasia (EGGIM) varies from 0 (normal endoscopy with no areas suggestive of intestinal metaplasia) to 10 (diffuse metaplasia in all gastric areas). Five different areas were considered (two areas in the antrum, two in the corpus, and one in the incisura). Each area was scored 0 (no intestinal metaplasia), 1 (focal intestinal metaplasia, ≤30 % of the area), or 2 points (extensive intestinal metaplasia in that area, > 30 % of the area), giving a possible total of 10 points. The higher the score, the more severe the degree of intestinal metaplasia, and the higher the risk of gastric cancer in patients.
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Shandong University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: yanqing Li, MD, PHD, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 14, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 27, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2022SDU-QILU-111

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings