Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Real-time Heart Team Approach in Complex CAD (EHEART)

July 25, 2025 updated by: China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

Feasibility and Effectiveness of a Real-time Heart Team Approach in Complex Coronary Artery Disease

This study is aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes, efficiency and feasibility of the real-time heart team approach and the conventional heart team approach.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This study is a multicenter, randomized controlled trial. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, patients with complex coronary artery disease undergoing elective coronary angiography will be prospectively enrolled in the study. Patients will be randomly assigned to the real-time heart team group and the conventional heart team group by block randomization. The real-time heart team group needs to conduct multidisciplinary heart team discussion during the coronary angiography process, while the traditional heart team group needs to conduct multidisciplinary heart team discussion offline and face-to-face after the coronary angiography process. This study will prospectively collect the patient information, heart team meeting process, clinical treatment, and clinical outcomes to evaluate the efficiency and feasibility and differences in clinical outcomes of patients under different heart team approaches.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
490

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100037
        • China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Significant stenosis in the left main or left main equivalent with or without stenosis in one of the other vessels[Significant stenosis is defined as: 1) a diameter stenosis of at least 50% reduction in luminal diameter by visual assessment or 2) any total occlusion (no age limitation and no exclusion of unfavorable anatomic features); Left main equivalent disease is defined as significant stenosis of the ostium of the left anterior descending and the ostium of the left circumflex.]
  2. At least 1 significant stenosis (≥ 70% obstruction) in all 3 major epicardial territories supplying viable myocardium;
  3. Other conditions that the interventional cardiologist considers necessary to discuss with cardiac surgeons due to technical and risk considerations.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Less than 18 years of age;
  2. Previous history of PCI or CABG;
  3. Admitted for AMI, ECG and biomarker detection indicated acute stage;
  4. Patients with severe heart valvular disease, major vascular disease, and giant ventricular aneurysm require surgical treatment;
  5. Combined with AF or severe arrhythmia;
  6. Other patients admitted to hospital due to emergency circumstances who are not suitable to wait for elective revascularization;
  7. Rejection or exclusion of a revascularization mode (PCI or CABG);
  8. Refuse to participate in the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: real-time heart team group
Patients randomized to this group will be accessed and discussed by multidisciplinary specialists during the coronary angiography process
Behavioral: heart team meeting and discussion
When the patient is eligible for the study, the interventional cardiologist will invite a cardiac surgeon to conduct a heart team discussion. Both specialists will assess the patient comprehensively and make an optimal decision for the patient, with consideration patient's preference.
Active Comparator: conventional heart team group
Patients randomized to this group will be accessed and discussed offline and face-to-face by multidisciplinary specialists after the coronary angiography process
Behavioral: heart team meeting and discussion
When the patient is eligible for the study, the interventional cardiologist will invite a cardiac surgeon to conduct a heart team discussion. Both specialists will assess the patient comprehensively and make an optimal decision for the patient, with consideration patient's preference.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1-year major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events
Time Frame: At 1 year after the coronary angiography
a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, unplanned revascularization, readmission due to reangina.
At 1 year after the coronary angiography

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
success rate of heart team organization
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
to assess the successful-connection with cardiac surgeons during or after the coronary angiography
through study completion, an average of 1 year
length of stay
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
to assess length of stay (LOS) before the final treatment, and the totol LOS in hospital
through study completion, an average of 1 year
total cost
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 3 year
to assess the total cost in hospital for the initial hospitalization and rehospitalization
through study completion, an average of 3 year
individual clinical adverse events
Time Frame: At 1 year after the coronary angiography
including all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization of target vessels or transplanted vessels, revascularization for any reason, be admitted to hospital with angina again, readmission for cardiac reasons and readmission for any reason
At 1 year after the coronary angiography
time interval between the completion of coronary angiography and the final treatment
Time Frame: through treatment completion, an average of 60 days
time interval is considered as a key secondary outcome
through treatment completion, an average of 60 days
revascularization decision-making
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
to assess the distribution of the revascularization decision-making made jointly by the heart team and the patients, such as CABG, PCI or medical therapy
through study completion, an average of 1 year
revascularization decision-making guideline adherence
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
adjudicated according to 2018 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/ European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS) guideline
through study completion, an average of 1 year
heart team decision-making
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
to assess the distribution of the decision-making made by the heart team, such as CABG, PCI or medical therapy
through study completion, an average of 1 year
workload of heart team specialists
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
to assess the workload of the specialists participating in the heart team meetings by NASA-TLX scale
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
China National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Zhe Zheng, MD,PhD, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 21, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 11, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 22, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 22, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 24, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 30, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 25, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2022-1749

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings