Effect of Low-level Laser Therapy on Orthodontic Tooth Movement
Effect of Low-level Laser Therapy on Orthodontic Tooth Movement During Miniscrew-supported Maxillary Molar Distalization in Humans: A Single-blind, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Nicosia, Cyprus
- Beren Özsoy
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Skeletal class I or mild class II malocclusion,
- No untreated decayed teeth,
- Normodivergent skeletal pattern,
- Fully erupted maxillary first and second molars,
- Male and female individuals between the ages of 16 and 22,
- Extracted or congenitally missing maxillary third molars,
- Non smoker,
- No alveolar bone loss or periodontal disease,
- Bilateral class II molar relationship,
- Absence of crowding or spacing in the posterior region,
- Adequate oral hygiene.
- No drug usage that may have an impact on the biology of tooth movement (Example; Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs- NSAIDS)
Exclusion Criteria:
• Hypodivergent or hyperdivergent skeletal pattern,
- Alveolar bone loss or periodontal disease,
- Systemic illnesses that might affect bone metabolism,
- Any drug use that may have an impact on the biology of tooth movement (Example; Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs- NSAIDS),
- Inadequate oral hygiene,
- Unilateral class II molar relationship,
- Smoker,
- Severe class II skeletal malocclusion (ANB>7°),
- Crowding or spacing in the posterior region,
- Missing maxillary second molars,
- Existence of maxillary third molars,
- Having untreated decayed teeth.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention (Laser group)
The participants in the intervention group experienced a total of 7 session laser applications on their randomly determined molar region during the 12-week clinical trial period.
|
The participants in the intervention group experienced a total of 7 session laser applications on their randomly determined molar region during the 12-week clinical trial period.
|
|
No Intervention: Contralateral (Non-laser group)
Laser was not applied to the contralateral side of the intervention group (n=10) and the individuals in the control group (n=10); thus, no application was made to accelerate tooth movement
|
|
|
No Intervention: Control (Non-laser group)
Laser was not applied to the contralateral side of the intervention group (n=10) and the individuals in the control group (n=10); thus, no application was made to accelerate tooth movement
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Amount of maxillary molar distalization
Time Frame: 84 days after
|
Measurements were made using miniscrew as a reference point.
Digital measurements were made on Geomagic Studio 2014 software to evaluate the amount of maxillary molar distalization.
All 3D digital model measurements were coded, and the same researcher carried out two separate measurements 1-week apart to increase the reliability of the measurements.
Parallelism was ensured between the dental arch and the Y-axis on the side where the measurements would be made by guiding the models.
The parallelism of the dental arch to the Y-axis was also assessed from the lateral view.
The midpoint of the first miniscrew and the mesial edge of the maxillary first molar were marked in the occlusal view.
Then the distance between the projections of these two reference points to the Y-axis was measured.
The difference between the two consecutive measurements indicated the 3-week amount of distalization in T1, T2, T3 and T4.
This procedure was applied on both sides of all 3D models
|
84 days after
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- NearEastU-001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.