HIV and Alcohol Research Center Focused on Polypharmacy (HARP) Pilot 1
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Amy C Justice, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 3541 203-932-5711
- Email: amy.justice2@va.gov
Study Locations
-
-
Connecticut
-
West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516
- West Haven CT Veterans Administration
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- participants in both Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS) and Medications, Alcohol, and Substance use in HIV (MASH) studies
- prescribed 5 or more medications AND who either have a positive PEth value (8+) or a self-reported AUDIT-C value consistent with current alcohol use (score >0)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Alcohol use disorder (AUD) diagnosis in the past 12 months or who test positive for AUD on the Alcohol Symptom Checklist for moderate or severe AUD (score of 4 or more)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: HIV Medications and Alcohol Use
Participants with HIV who take 5 or more medications and currently (within the past month) consume alcohol
|
The clinical pharmacist will employ MI in informational, participant-centered discussions in which the clinical pharmacist and participant collaboratively discuss the harms of drinking and polypharmacy (specifically alcohol interactive medications), symptoms associated with alcohol and specific medications, and how to mitigate these harms.
Motivational elements include messages highlighting the participant's personal risk of bothersome symptoms from their use of alcohol and level of polypharmacy, attitude change elements to improve attitudes toward the intended behavior change, social normative support for the intended behavior change including identification of people who can support the participant in this process, and a menu of options for referrals for skill building (e.g.
Social Work, meeting with the clinical pharmacist at their clinic, follow-up with the HIV clinician, alcohol-reduction programs, based on what is locally available as part of VA-based care).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Enrollment to Assess Feasibility
Time Frame: baseline
|
Number of participants that enrolled and provided informed consent
|
baseline
|
|
Completion to Assess Feasibility
Time Frame: Study completion (Post-intervention Day 30)
|
Number of participants that completed the full pilot intervention
|
Study completion (Post-intervention Day 30)
|
|
Qualitative Interviews to Assess Feasibility
Time Frame: Study completion (within one to four weeks after Post-intervention Day 30)
|
Number of participants that successfully completed the qualitative interviews
|
Study completion (within one to four weeks after Post-intervention Day 30)
|
|
Change in Bothersome Symptoms From Baseline Using the HIV Symptoms Index
Time Frame: baseline, post-intervention Day 1, Post-intervention Day 30
|
The HIV Symptoms Index is a 20-item, self-reported measure that assesses presence and perceived distress linked to symptoms associated with HIV or HIV treatment.
There are 5 possible responses: 0 = I don't have this symptom; 1 = It doesn't bother me; 2 = It bothers me a little; 3 = It bothers me; and 4 = It bothers me a lot, for each HIV symptom.
Presented here is the number of bothersome symptoms with improvement on post-intervention Day 1 and post-intervention Day 30.
|
baseline, post-intervention Day 1, Post-intervention Day 30
|
|
Number of Participants That Completed Both PEth Tests to Assess Acceptability.
Time Frame: baseline and Post-intervention Day 30
|
Change in alcohol levels assessed measuring PEth levels in the blood.
PEth testing uses blood to measure alcohol use by detecting direct alcohol biomarkers in the bloodstream.
A positive test indicates alcohol use.
|
baseline and Post-intervention Day 30
|
|
Participants Readiness to Change Prescribed Medications
Time Frame: baseline, immediately post intervention (day 1) and Post-intervention Day 30
|
The mean score of participants responses by self report.
Participants were asked "If your provider felt it was a good idea, how ready are you to decrease your medications?",
"If your provider felt it was a good idea, how important is it for you to decrease your medications?", and "If your provider felt it was a good idea, how confident are you that you can decrease your medications?"
Each question is scored on a 1-10 scale (1=not at all ready, 10=extremely ready).
Total score range for each question is 1-10 with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
|
baseline, immediately post intervention (day 1) and Post-intervention Day 30
|
|
Participants Readiness to Change Alcohol Use
Time Frame: baseline, immediately post intervention (day 1) and Post-intervention Day 30
|
The mean score of participants responses by self report.
Participants were asked "If your provider felt it was a good idea, how ready are you to decrease your alcohol use?", "If your provider felt it was a good idea, how important is it for you to decrease your alcohol use?", and "If your provider felt it was a good idea, how confident are you that you can decrease your alcohol use?"
Each question is scored on a 1-10 scale (1=not at all ready, 10=extremely ready).
Total score range for each question is 1-10 with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
|
baseline, immediately post intervention (day 1) and Post-intervention Day 30
|
|
Medication Use to Assess Acceptability
Time Frame: Post-intervention Day 30
|
The number of respondents who reported they (1) felt comfortable with the way medication information was presented, (2) understood the information given, (3) found the information helpful, (4) felt the amount of information was adequate, and (5) felt the information that they received was clear.
Participants provided their responses to each question using a 5-point Likert scale (response options 1-5 with higher numbers indicating better acceptability).
We will evaluate the number of participants who responded with a 4 or a 5.
|
Post-intervention Day 30
|
|
Information Regarding PEth to Assess Acceptability
Time Frame: Post-intervention Day 30
|
The number of respondents who reported that they (1) felt comfortable with the way PEth information was presented, (2) understood the information given, (3) found the information helpful, (4) felt the amount of information was adequate, and (5) felt the information that they received was clear.
Participants provided their responses to each question using a 5-point Likert scale (response options 1-5 with higher numbers indicating better acceptability).
We will evaluate the number of participants who responded with a 4 or a 5.
|
Post-intervention Day 30
|
|
General Feedback to Assess Acceptability
Time Frame: Post-intervention Day 30
|
The number of respondents who (1) felt they learned new things about their health risk from alcohol, (2) learned new things about their health risk from polypharmacy, (3) learned how medications and alcohol can act together, and (4) felt that having a pharmacist to talk with was helpful.
Participants provided their responses to each question using a 5-point Likert scale (response options 1-5 with higher numbers indicating better acceptability).
We will evaluate the number of participants who responded with a 4 or a 5.
|
Post-intervention Day 30
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Amy C Justice, MD, PhD, Yale University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Justice 090622
- P01AA029545-03 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
- P01 AA029545-03 sub 9238 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Sub Award P01 AA029545-03)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.