HIV and Alcohol Research Center Focused on Polypharmacy (HARP) Pilot 1

June 17, 2025 updated by: Yale University
This pilot intervention will consist of a brief intervention for patients with HIV who take 5 or more medications and currently (within the past month) consume alcohol. The focus of this pilot will be on bothersome symptoms and the impact of alcohol use and medications on these symptoms. The rationale is that any alcohol use may interact with medications in serious ways leading to adverse outcomes, including bothersome symptoms.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Additional outcomes were added at results entry.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • West Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06516
        • West Haven CT Veterans Administration

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • participants in both Veterans Aging Cohort Study (VACS) and Medications, Alcohol, and Substance use in HIV (MASH) studies
  • prescribed 5 or more medications AND who either have a positive PEth value (8+) or a self-reported AUDIT-C value consistent with current alcohol use (score >0)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Alcohol use disorder (AUD) diagnosis in the past 12 months or who test positive for AUD on the Alcohol Symptom Checklist for moderate or severe AUD (score of 4 or more)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HIV Medications and Alcohol Use
Participants with HIV who take 5 or more medications and currently (within the past month) consume alcohol
The clinical pharmacist will employ MI in informational, participant-centered discussions in which the clinical pharmacist and participant collaboratively discuss the harms of drinking and polypharmacy (specifically alcohol interactive medications), symptoms associated with alcohol and specific medications, and how to mitigate these harms. Motivational elements include messages highlighting the participant's personal risk of bothersome symptoms from their use of alcohol and level of polypharmacy, attitude change elements to improve attitudes toward the intended behavior change, social normative support for the intended behavior change including identification of people who can support the participant in this process, and a menu of options for referrals for skill building (e.g. Social Work, meeting with the clinical pharmacist at their clinic, follow-up with the HIV clinician, alcohol-reduction programs, based on what is locally available as part of VA-based care).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Enrollment to Assess Feasibility
Time Frame: baseline
Number of participants that enrolled and provided informed consent
baseline
Completion to Assess Feasibility
Time Frame: Study completion (Post-intervention Day 30)
Number of participants that completed the full pilot intervention
Study completion (Post-intervention Day 30)
Qualitative Interviews to Assess Feasibility
Time Frame: Study completion (within one to four weeks after Post-intervention Day 30)
Number of participants that successfully completed the qualitative interviews
Study completion (within one to four weeks after Post-intervention Day 30)
Change in Bothersome Symptoms From Baseline Using the HIV Symptoms Index
Time Frame: baseline, post-intervention Day 1, Post-intervention Day 30
The HIV Symptoms Index is a 20-item, self-reported measure that assesses presence and perceived distress linked to symptoms associated with HIV or HIV treatment. There are 5 possible responses: 0 = I don't have this symptom; 1 = It doesn't bother me; 2 = It bothers me a little; 3 = It bothers me; and 4 = It bothers me a lot, for each HIV symptom. Presented here is the number of bothersome symptoms with improvement on post-intervention Day 1 and post-intervention Day 30.
baseline, post-intervention Day 1, Post-intervention Day 30
Number of Participants That Completed Both PEth Tests to Assess Acceptability.
Time Frame: baseline and Post-intervention Day 30
Change in alcohol levels assessed measuring PEth levels in the blood. PEth testing uses blood to measure alcohol use by detecting direct alcohol biomarkers in the bloodstream. A positive test indicates alcohol use.
baseline and Post-intervention Day 30
Participants Readiness to Change Prescribed Medications
Time Frame: baseline, immediately post intervention (day 1) and Post-intervention Day 30
The mean score of participants responses by self report. Participants were asked "If your provider felt it was a good idea, how ready are you to decrease your medications?", "If your provider felt it was a good idea, how important is it for you to decrease your medications?", and "If your provider felt it was a good idea, how confident are you that you can decrease your medications?" Each question is scored on a 1-10 scale (1=not at all ready, 10=extremely ready). Total score range for each question is 1-10 with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
baseline, immediately post intervention (day 1) and Post-intervention Day 30
Participants Readiness to Change Alcohol Use
Time Frame: baseline, immediately post intervention (day 1) and Post-intervention Day 30
The mean score of participants responses by self report. Participants were asked "If your provider felt it was a good idea, how ready are you to decrease your alcohol use?", "If your provider felt it was a good idea, how important is it for you to decrease your alcohol use?", and "If your provider felt it was a good idea, how confident are you that you can decrease your alcohol use?" Each question is scored on a 1-10 scale (1=not at all ready, 10=extremely ready). Total score range for each question is 1-10 with higher scores indicating better outcomes.
baseline, immediately post intervention (day 1) and Post-intervention Day 30
Medication Use to Assess Acceptability
Time Frame: Post-intervention Day 30
The number of respondents who reported they (1) felt comfortable with the way medication information was presented, (2) understood the information given, (3) found the information helpful, (4) felt the amount of information was adequate, and (5) felt the information that they received was clear. Participants provided their responses to each question using a 5-point Likert scale (response options 1-5 with higher numbers indicating better acceptability). We will evaluate the number of participants who responded with a 4 or a 5.
Post-intervention Day 30
Information Regarding PEth to Assess Acceptability
Time Frame: Post-intervention Day 30
The number of respondents who reported that they (1) felt comfortable with the way PEth information was presented, (2) understood the information given, (3) found the information helpful, (4) felt the amount of information was adequate, and (5) felt the information that they received was clear. Participants provided their responses to each question using a 5-point Likert scale (response options 1-5 with higher numbers indicating better acceptability). We will evaluate the number of participants who responded with a 4 or a 5.
Post-intervention Day 30
General Feedback to Assess Acceptability
Time Frame: Post-intervention Day 30
The number of respondents who (1) felt they learned new things about their health risk from alcohol, (2) learned new things about their health risk from polypharmacy, (3) learned how medications and alcohol can act together, and (4) felt that having a pharmacist to talk with was helpful. Participants provided their responses to each question using a 5-point Likert scale (response options 1-5 with higher numbers indicating better acceptability). We will evaluate the number of participants who responded with a 4 or a 5.
Post-intervention Day 30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amy C Justice, MD, PhD, Yale University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 6, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 4, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

January 4, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 26, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 17, 2025

Last Verified

June 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Justice 090622
  • P01AA029545-03 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • P01 AA029545-03 sub 9238 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Sub Award P01 AA029545-03)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The data will not be shared by placing it in a data repository, but will be shared with those who submit a reasonable request .

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV

Clinical Trials on IMB-motivational interviewing (MI) techniques (IMB-MI)

Subscribe