Multimodal Equipment for Teleophthalmology Assessment (META)

October 3, 2022 updated by: Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

Clinical Validation Study for Multimodal Equipment for Teleophthalmology Assessment (META) Device

We have developed a Multimodal Equipment for Teleophthalmology Assessment (META) device. This novel device is compact, portable and suitable for packaging and express delivery. With this device, there is a potential to implement a new concept of "hospital-at-home" eye care model. The present study is designed to validate the META device for future clinical usage and investigation. We will compare the performance of the META device with those provided by commercial devices in terms of image quality of optical coherence tomography (OCT), anterior segment and fundus camera, and evaluate the level of agreement in lesion detection and quantitative measurements between META and other commercial devices (e.g., Heidelberg Spectralis OCT, Haag-Streit BQ900 Slit-lamp imaging, Canon CR-2 fundus imaging, Zeiss IOL Master 500).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The META is an innovative and non-invasive examination instrument for a variety of common eye diseases. The integrated multimodality device combines digital slit lamp, fundus camera, OCT, refractometer, optical biometry and visual acuity test (near and distance) that facilitate a comprehensive ophthalmic examination. In the current study, all participants will undergo the measurements provided by the META and by traditional examination modalities (including digital slit lamp, fundus camera, OCT, refractometer, optical biometry and visual acuity test) in a random order. The participants will need to complete several questionnaires to investigate their preference and confidence to receive the META exams in the future.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
400

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants with healthy eyes or with common eye diseases.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years of age and older.
  • Participants with healthy eyes, or patients diagnosed with one or more common eye diseases, including anterior segment eye diseases (conjunctivitis, keratitis, corneal opacity or cataract), fundus diseases (age-related macular degeneration or diabetic retinopathy) and/or refractive error (myopia, high myopia, hyperopia, anisometropia, or presbyopia).
  • Willing and able to participate in all examinations related to this study
  • Visual acuity of 20/400 or better in the study eye(s).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ocular trauma or postoperative eyes within 3 months.
  • Study eye(s) with dilated pupil.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Patients with common eye diseases
Patients who have common eye diseases, including common anterior segment eye diseases (conjunctivitis, keratitis, corneal opacity, cataract) and fundus diseases (age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy) and refractive error (myopia, high myopia, hyperopia, anisometropia and presbyopia).
Device: META
The META device is used for a comprehensive ophthalmic examination.
Device: Commercial devices
Commercial devices (including near and far eye charts, refractometer, optical biometry, slit lamp microscopy, fundus camera and OCT) are used for a comprehensive ophthalmic examination.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Image Quality
Time Frame: in the same 1 day
To evaluate the image quality of the META versus commercial devices. These images include slit-lamp anterior-segment images, colour fundus photographs, and OCT scans. The image quality metrics (e.g., position, focus, contrast, etc.) will be identified by masked qualified ophthalmologists independently and scored according to the same grading scheme
in the same 1 day
Level of agreement in quantitative measurements provided by META-OCT and by commercial OCT
Time Frame: in the same 1 day
OCT images will be captured by META-OCT and by a commercial OCT, and segmented and analyzed with default algorithm to yield quantitative measurements.
in the same 1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of agreement in axial length measurement
Time Frame: in the same 1 day
Accuracy of axial length measurement will be captured by META-AL versus by a commercial biometric device.
in the same 1 day
Level of agreement in spherical equivalent diopter (SED) and astigmatism vector components (J0 and J45)
Time Frame: in the same 1 day
Accuracy of SED and J0 and J45 will be obtained by META-SE versus by a commercial refractor.
in the same 1 day
Level of agreement in near and far visual acuity measurements
Time Frame: in the same 1 day
Accuracy of near and far visual acuity measurements will be obtained by META-VA versus by reference ETDRS charts.
in the same 1 day
Level of agreement in detecting ocular abnormalities.
Time Frame: in the same 1 day
Agreement in the detection of ocular abnormalities (e.g., corneal scars, keratic precipitates, lens opacification, macular fluid, or other retinopathy) by META images versus by commercial imaging devices.
in the same 1 day
Repeatability in quantitative measurements provided by META-OCT
Time Frame: in the same 1 day
OCT images will be captured by META-OCT twice, and the repeatability of quantitative measurements will be assessed.
in the same 1 day
Exam success rate
Time Frame: in the same 1 day
The exam success rate will be obtained by META versus by commercial devices.
in the same 1 day
Time spent on the examinations
Time Frame: in the same 1 day
The time spent on the examinations will be obtained by META versus by commercial devices.
in the same 1 day
Patient experience
Time Frame: in the same 1 day
Investigator-administered questionnaires will be used to investigate participants' preferences and confidence to receive META exams in the future.
in the same 1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Yizhi Liu, M.D., Ph.D., State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 31, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 3, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IIT2022123

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings