Resistance Training With Blood Flow Restriction in Hemophilia (HemoBFR)
The Acute and Chronic Impact of Blood Flow Restriction Resistance Training on Physical and Neuromuscular Function, Pain, and Quality of Life in Patients With Moderate/Severe Hemophilia
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Sofía Pérez Alenda
- Phone Number: +34655382100
- Email: sofia.perez-alenda@uv.es
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Joaquín Calatayud
- Phone Number: +34625577509
- Email: joaquin.calatayud@uv.es
Study Locations
-
-
Valencia
-
Valencia, Valencia, Spain, 46010
- Facultat de Fisioteràpia
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- diagnosis of hemophilia A or B and undergoing prophylaxis;
- willingness to exercise twice a week during the training program and to complete the pre- and post-program evaluations;
- approval by their hematologist to participate in the exercise program;
- age between 18 and 60 years;
- informed consent signed.
Exclusion Criteria:
- the inability to attend exercise sessions at least twice a week for 8 consecutive weeks;
- non adherence to instruction on proper exercise technique;
- surgical procedures performed 6 weeks prior to or during the exercise program; - participation in any other form of exercise, not previously done, during the study;
- changes in medication during the study;
- a major bleeding episode that posed a risk or prevented exercise;
- another hemostatic defect;
- need for major surgery;
- withdrawal of informed consent.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Control
The training program for the control group consists of a telerehabilitation with traditional moderate-to-high load (60%-80% 1RM) exercises (the same as the intervention group sans BFR), utilizing elastic bands.
This program for the control group will be conducted in an in-home real-time audio and video style and supervised by a physiotherapist.
|
Moderate-to-high load (60%-80% 1RM) resistance exercise
|
|
Experimental: BFRT
The BFR training program for the intervention group consists of elbow flexion and extension, and knee extension exercises performed with low load (elastic bands; equivalent to 30% 1RM) and concurrent BFR (upper limb 50% AOP; lower limb 60% AOP).
Subjects will perform 4 sets (30, 15, 15 and 15 reps) of each exercise with 30 s rest between sets and 5-minute rest between exercises.
|
Low-load (30% 1RM) resistance exercise with blood flow restriction
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
HDsEMG
Time Frame: Baseline and week 8.
|
Change from baseline to the end of the intervention, and the change between the intervention group and the control group.
|
Baseline and week 8.
|
|
Hand-held dynamometry (isometric elbow flexion/extension, knee extension)
Time Frame: Baseline and week 8.
|
Change from baseline to the end of the intervention, and the change between the intervention group and the control group.
|
Baseline and week 8.
|
|
Muscle ultrasound (muscle mass, assessment of possible bleedings)
Time Frame: Baseline and week 8.
|
Change from baseline to the end of the intervention, and the change between the intervention group and the control group.
|
Baseline and week 8.
|
|
Digital goniometry for active elbow and knee ROM
Time Frame: Baseline and week 8.
|
Change from baseline to the end of the intervention, and the change between the intervention group and the control group.
|
Baseline and week 8.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Self-reported pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scale 0-10)
Time Frame: Baseline and week 8.
|
Change from baseline to the end of the intervention, and the change between the intervention group and the control group.
|
Baseline and week 8.
|
|
Pressure pain thresholds (digital algometry)
Time Frame: Baseline and week 8.
|
Change from baseline to the end of the intervention, and the change between the intervention group and the control group.
|
Baseline and week 8.
|
|
Haemophilia Activities List (HAL) questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline and week 8.
|
The HAL measures the impact of hemophilia on self-perceived functional abilities in adults. Its score range is 42-252, with higher scores representing more functional limitations. |
Baseline and week 8.
|
|
A36 haemophilia quality of life (Hemofilia-QoL) questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline and week 8.
|
A36 Hemofilia-QOL is a standardized disease specific questionnaire for the assessment of the health-related quality of life of people with haemophilia.
The domains are physical health, daily activities, treatment satisfaction, mental aspects, relationships and social activities.
There are 36 items and its score range is 0-144, with higher scores representing better outcomes.
|
Baseline and week 8.
|
|
Patient Global Impression of Change Scale (PGICS)
Time Frame: Baseline and week 8.
|
On this scale, the patient reflects the perception of the efficacy of the treatment received in their limitation to perform activities, symptoms, emotions and overall quality of life.
The PGICS consists of two subscales, one categorical and one quantitative.
The categorical scale is a 7-point verbal scale with the options "I have improved a lot" = 7, "I have improved a lot" = 6, "I have improved a little" = 5, "I am the same" = 4, "I have gotten a little worse" = 3, "I have gotten a lot worse" = 2, "I have gotten a lot worse" = 1.
Meanwhile, the quantitative scale consists of a line from 0 to 10, where 0 = much better and 10 = much worse.
|
Baseline and week 8.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sofía Pérez Alenda, University of Valencia
- Study Chair: Joaquín Calatayud, University of Valencia
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Hemo-BFR-22-24
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.