Identifying Electrophysiological Targets for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Cocaine Use Disorder (Pilot Study)
Identifying Electrophysiological Targets for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Cocaine Use Disorder
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- CUD diagnosis
Exclusion Criteria:
- moderate or severe criteria for substances other than cocaine, cannabis, or nicotine
- unstable psychiatric disorder
- medical conditions contraindicated to TMS (e.g., medical implants, history of seizure or seizure disorder, medications lowering the seizure threshold, neurological conditions, moderate-to-severe heart disease)
- pregnancy
- hairstyles incompatible with the EEG net
- head injury with loss of consciousness
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: iTBS to dmPFC, Then Sham iTBS
|
TMS will be delivered with a MagVenture Mag Pro R30 with the Cool-B70 A/P coil with active liquid cooling and active/sham sides.
Approximately 25% of the nasion-inion distance, or Talairah coordinates X 0 Y+60 Z+60 will be measured.The first session will begin with the acquisition of the resting motor threshold (rMT; lowest stimulus intensity that elicits a visible twitch on 50% of the trials) on the contralateral hand.
iTBS (triplet 50 Hz bursts, repeated at 5 Hz, 2 sec on and 8 sec off; 600 pulses per session) will be delivered at 110% of the rMT and will last about 3 minutes.
Each participant will receive 2 sessions with a 15-20 minute interval between sessions.
Sham TMS will be delivered with the sham side of the MagVenture Cool B70 A/P coil.
The software will be pre-programmed by a staff member that will not be involved in data analysis or collection for blinding purposes.
The sham stimulation will match the number of pulses and length of time as the active condition and each participant will receive 2 sessions with a 15-20 min interval between sessions.
|
|
Sham Comparator: Sham iTBS, Then iTBS to dmPFC
|
TMS will be delivered with a MagVenture Mag Pro R30 with the Cool-B70 A/P coil with active liquid cooling and active/sham sides.
Approximately 25% of the nasion-inion distance, or Talairah coordinates X 0 Y+60 Z+60 will be measured.The first session will begin with the acquisition of the resting motor threshold (rMT; lowest stimulus intensity that elicits a visible twitch on 50% of the trials) on the contralateral hand.
iTBS (triplet 50 Hz bursts, repeated at 5 Hz, 2 sec on and 8 sec off; 600 pulses per session) will be delivered at 110% of the rMT and will last about 3 minutes.
Each participant will receive 2 sessions with a 15-20 minute interval between sessions.
Sham TMS will be delivered with the sham side of the MagVenture Cool B70 A/P coil.
The software will be pre-programmed by a staff member that will not be involved in data analysis or collection for blinding purposes.
The sham stimulation will match the number of pulses and length of time as the active condition and each participant will receive 2 sessions with a 15-20 min interval between sessions.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Amplitude of the Reward Potential (RewP) in Microvolts in Response to Feedback on the Doors Task as Assessed by EEG
Time Frame: Baseline (before iTBS session)
|
The Doors Task will be used to elicit the Reward Potential (RewP) component, representing reward sensitivity.
The task is a guessing game, where participants guess which door contains a reward behind it.
After selecting a door, the participants are notified if they found the prize by a green arrow pointing up or if they did not find the prize by a red arrow pointing down.
The amplitude of the RewP in microvolts in response to feedback is reported.
|
Baseline (before iTBS session)
|
|
Amplitude of the Reward Potential (RewP) in Microvolts in Response to Feedback on the Doors Task as Assessed by EEG
Time Frame: Immediately after iTBS session
|
The Doors Task will be used to elicit the Reward Potential (RewP) component, representing reward sensitivity.
The task is a guessing game, where participants guess which door contains a reward behind it.
After selecting a door, the participants are notified if they found the prize by a green arrow pointing up (win) or if they did not find the prize by a red arrow pointing down (loss).
The amplitude of the RewP in microvolts in response to feedback is reported.
|
Immediately after iTBS session
|
|
Amplitude of the Late Positive Potential (LPP) in Microvolts in Response to Visual Stimuli on the Picture Viewing Task as Assessed by EEG
Time Frame: Baseline (before iTBS session)
|
The Picture Viewing Task will be used to elicit the late positive potential (LPP), reflecting the motivational salience of a stimulus.
During this task, participants are asked to view a slideshow of images including pleasant, unpleasant, neutral, and cocaine-related images.
The amplitude of the LPP in microvolts in response to visual stimuli is reported.
|
Baseline (before iTBS session)
|
|
Amplitude of the Late Positive Potential (LPP) in Microvolts in Response to Visual Stimuli on the Picture Viewing Task as Assessed by EEG
Time Frame: Immediately after iTBS session
|
The Picture Viewing Task will be used to elicit the late positive potential (LPP), reflecting the motivational salience of a stimulus.
During this task, participants are asked to view a slideshow of images including pleasant, unpleasant, neutral, and cocaine-related images.
The amplitude of the LPP in microvolts in response to visual stimuli is reported.
|
Immediately after iTBS session
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Craving as Assessed by the Minnesota Cocaine Craving Scale (MCCS)
Time Frame: Baseline(before iTBS session)
|
The first question (intensity of craving) will be used and is measured from 0(none, not at all) to 100(a great deal), higher number indicating more craving.
|
Baseline(before iTBS session)
|
|
Craving as Assessed by the Minnesota Cocaine Craving Scale (MCCS)
Time Frame: Immediately after iTBS session
|
The first question (intensity of craving) will be used and is measured from 0(none, not at all) to 100(a great deal), higher number indicating more craving.
|
Immediately after iTBS session
|
|
Pain as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline(before iTBS session)
|
This is scored from 0(no pain) to 10 (worst pain), higher score indicating greater pain.
|
Baseline(before iTBS session)
|
|
Pain as Assessed by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Immediately after iTBS session
|
This is scored from 0(no pain) to 10 (worst pain), higher score indicating greater pain.
|
Immediately after iTBS session
|
|
Cognitive Function as Assessed by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: Baseline(before iTBS session)
|
Total score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
|
Baseline(before iTBS session)
|
|
Cognitive Function as Assessed by the The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: Immediately after iTBS session
|
Total score on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating a better outcome.
|
Immediately after iTBS session
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Heather Webber, PhD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HSC-MS-21-0813 (pilot study)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.