CTO-PCI in Heart Failure Patients (CTO-HF)

September 15, 2024 updated by: Michael Behnes, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Chronic Total Occlusion of Coronary Arteries and Heart Failure.

The study investigates wheather CTO-PCI improves survival and heart failure related rehospitalization compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT). This hypothesis will be investigated within a large-scaled international, representative, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, event-driven, multicentre trial (trial acronym: CTO - Heart Failure) recruiting patients with planned CTO-PCI.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cause of heart failure and death worldwide. Beside non-occlusive coronary arterial stenoses, 25% of CAD patients have a so called chronic total occlusion (CTO) at one out of three main coronary arteries. CTO are often left untreated by physicians over many years due to lack of knowledge of its prognostic relevance and due to be too challenging and risky for the interventional cardiologist, particularly in the presence of severe comorbidities such as heart failure. By development of new interventional devices, techniques and algorithms, CTO can be revascularized in more than 90% with low complication rates. Per se, a patient suffering from comorbid heart failure caused by CAD including a CTO is often regarded as inoperable for heart surgery by coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Therefore, the only causal alternative therapy represents the less-invasive interventional revascularization of the CTO by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Until now, the prognostic impact of CTO-PCI has never been proven. Our recent work has outlined the beneficial impact of CTO-PCI to improve both left ventricular cardiac function and cardiopulmonary exercise capacity in patients with heart failure. Our objective is to understand whether CTO-PCI improves survival and heart failure related rehospitalization compared to optimal medical therapy (OMT). This hypothesis will be investigated within a large-scaled representative, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, event-driven, multicentre trial (trial acronym: CTO - Heart Failure) recruiting patients with planned CTO-PCI. The CTO Heart Failure aims to deliver evidence whether CTO-PCI might become a prognostically relevant established therapeutic option for patients with systolic heart failure.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
783

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 86 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent.
  • Presence of at least one CTO located at the proximal to midpart of left artery descending (LAD), or at proximal left circumflex (LCX), or at proximal to midpart LCX in left dominant system, or at proximal to distal right coronary artery (RCA).
  • LVEF <50% (assessed within 6 weeks prior to enrolment by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) (Simpson biplane method) or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI).
  • In patients with multivessel disease (MVD) and Syntax I score ≥ 22, and all patients with type 2 diabetes and coronary 3 vessel disease, a heart team decision favouring CTO-PCI is needed.
  • Mandatory baseline imaging assessment (assessed within 6 weeks prior to enrolment):
  • TTE: Normal wall motion or hypokinesia in the CTO-territory.
  • In case of severe hypokinesia, akinesia or dyskinesia a viability testing with cMRI or myocardial scintigraphy (MS) indicating at least 50% of viability in the CTO territory (mandatory only in the presence of akinesia in the CTO-territory assessed by prior TTE) prior to PCI is mandatory.
  • Symptoms including dyspnea (according to the New York Heart Association (NYHA), classes II-III) or angina pectoris (according to Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS), classes II-IV).
  • In the absence of symptoms evidence of myocardial ischemia of at least 10% is needed being assessed by invasive or non-invasive imaging, such as stress-MRI, PET-CT-scan, myocardial scintigraphy, stress-echocardiography

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age <18 and >90 years.
  • Akinesia or dyskinesia assessed by TTE plus subendocardial late gadolinium enhancement of >50% assessed by cMRI or MS in the CTO-territory or any evidence of transmural scarring of the CTO-territory (i.e. 100%).
  • Presence of terminal kidney disease with need for renal replacement therapy.
  • Severe chronic kidney disease (defined as GFR < 25 ml/min).
  • Type I myocardial infarction (ST segment elevation or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI or NSTEMI)) related to critical arteriosclerosis < 30 days.
  • End-stage heart failure (defined by constant administration of intravenous inotropes, use of prolonged assist devices (more than 5 days), listing for high urgent cardiac transplantation).
  • Cardiogenic shock (< 30 days).
  • Heart team decision favoring CABG surgery (in the presence of coronary multivessel disease with intermediate to high SYNTAX I score).
  • Grade II-III heart valve disorders requiring interventional or surgical treatment within 3 months.
  • Right-sided heart failure with echocardiographic evidence of severe right ventricular dysfunction.
  • COPD requiring long-term oxygen therapy.
  • Non-cardiac comorbidity with life expectancy < 12 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: CTO-PCI
Procedure: CTO-PCI
Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of a coronary chronic total occlusion (CTO) (CTO-PCI) in patients with systolic heart failure (LVEF <50%).
No Intervention: non-CTO-PCI

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure related rehospitalization.
Time Frame: up to 3 years
Heart failure related rehospitalization is defined as a rehospitalization due to worsening heart failure requiring intravenous therapy as the primary cause, or as a result of another cause but associated with worsening heart failure at the time of admission, or as a result of another cause but complicated by worsening heart failure during its course
up to 3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Canadian cardiovascular society (CCS) class
Time Frame: up to 3 years
angina pectoris
up to 3 years
All-cause mortality.
Time Frame: up to 3 years
up to 3 years
Heart failure related rehospitalization.
Time Frame: up to 3 years
up to 3 years
MACCE
Time Frame: up to 3 years
MACCE are defined as the composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction (type I and II), any further type of coronary revascularization (i.e. PCI or CABG) based on functional invasive assessment by fractional flow reserve (FFR) or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), and stroke.
up to 3 years
Number of participanty with rehospitalization due to cardiac diseases beyond heart failure.
Time Frame: up to 3 years
up to 3 years
assessment of quality of life
Time Frame: up to 3 years
Seattle angina questionnaire (SAQ) (0-100; 75-100 normal).
up to 3 years
cost effectivenes
Time Frame: up to 3 years
direct and indirect health care related costs
up to 3 years
Re-assessment of LVEF
Time Frame: up to 3 years
up to 3 years
New York Heart association (NYHA) class
Time Frame: up to 36 months
dyspnea
up to 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
IHF GmbH - Institut für Herzinfarktforschung
Herzzentrum Lahr

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Behnes, Prof. Dr., Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
  • Study Director: Kambis Mashayekhi, PD Dr., MEDICLIN Herzzentrum Lahr

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 30, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 15, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 01012022-MA

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings