Treatment of Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection Comparing Single and Planned Double-Debridement Antibiotics and Implant Retention Followed by Chronic Antibiotic Suppression

December 10, 2025 updated by: Matthew P. Abdel, M.D., Mayo Clinic

Single vs Planned Double-Debridement Antibiotics and Implant Retention Followed by Chronic Antibiotic Suppression for the Treatment of Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Clinical Trial

The purpose of this research is to evaluate two different standard of care surgeries in treating periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total hip and knee arthroplasty. Researchers are looking at differences in outcomes following single versus planned double debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) for acutely infected total hip arthroplasty (THA), and total knee arthroplasties (TKAs).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Enrolling by invitation

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
490

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32224
        • Mayo Clinic Florida
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic Minnesota

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who speak English and are willing to sign the consent form

  • Patients with acute early postoperative infection (symptoms ≤ 4 weeks from surgery; symptoms < 4 weeks in duration) and acute hematogenous infection (greater than 4 weeks from surgery; symptoms < 3 weeks in duration) of a primary total knee or total hip arthroplasty, defined as:

    • A sinus communicating with the prosthesis OR
    • Two positive cultures obtained from the prosthesis OR
    • 4 of 5 criteria: Elevated ESR (> 30mm/hr) and CRP (> 10mg/L); Elevated synovial leukocyte count (>3000 cells/μL) or change of ++ on; leukocyte esterase strip; Elevated synovial neutrophil percentage (> 80%); One positive culture; Positive histological analysis of periprosthetic tissue (> 5 neutrophils per high; Power field in 5 high power fields x 400).
  • OR Patient with an acute infection diagnosed clinically by an orthopedic surgeon treated with DAIR

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a chronic PJI, defined as: presentation of symptoms > 4 weeks in duration.
  • Revision surgery or previous two-stage reimplantation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Single DAIR Surgery Arm
Subjects will undergo a single Debridement Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) surgical procedure, along with IV antibiotics and followed by oral suppressive antibiotics. This method is currently used and considered to be standard of care.
Procedure: Single Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention
Surgical debridement and wash out of infected joint. The polyethylene (plastic) insert, which acts as the articulating surface (modular component) of the prosthesis, will be removed and the exposed surfaces scrubbed, sterilized, and soaked. A new modular component will be placed with additional irrigation and antiseptic soak. Tissue cultures will be sent to the lab for further evaluation and antibiotic guidance. After the operation subjects will continue six weeks of IV antibiotics followed by oral antibiotic suppression for the life of the implant or at least two years after operation.
Active Comparator: Double DAIR Surgery Arm
Subjects will undergo planned double Debridement Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) surgical procedure, along with IV antibiotics and followed by oral suppressive antibiotics. This method is currently used and considered to be standard of care.
Procedure: Planned Double Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention
Surgical debridement and wash out of infected joint with an additional irrigation and debridement scheduled for approximately 5 days after the initial DAIR. During the first washout, antibiotic cement beads will be placed in the joint and these will remain in the interim until they are removed during the second washout. During the second DAIR, the antibiotic beads are removed, and the modular components are once again removed and replaced with new components. Exposed surfaces are again irrigated and debrided following a standardized protocol. A six-week course of IV antibiotics will follow the DAIR with additional oral antibiotics for the life of the component (standard of care) or at least a minimum of two years.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjects free from failure
Time Frame: 1 year following DAIR.
Total number of subjects considered failure free at one year from surgical DAIR procedure. Failure is defined as reoperation for infection within one year from surgical procedure.
1 year following DAIR.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Readmission within 90 days of the surgical DAIR procedure
Time Frame: 90 days following DAIR procedure
Total number of subjects to required hospital readmission within 90 days of DAIR.
90 days following DAIR procedure
1-year surgical reoperation rate
Time Frame: 1 year following DAIR procedure
Total number of subjects to require reoperation or revision with or without infection within one year from the surgical DAIR procedure.
1 year following DAIR procedure
5-year surgical reoperation rate
Time Frame: 5 years following DAIR procedure
Total number of subjects to require reoperation or revision with or without infection within five years from the surgical DAIR procedure.
5 years following DAIR procedure
10-year surgical revision rate
Time Frame: 10 years following DAIR procedure
Total number of subjects to require reoperation or revision with or without infection within ten years from the surgical DAIR procedure.
10 years following DAIR procedure
Hospital length of stay
Time Frame: Approximately 2 weeks following DAIR procedure
Total number of days subjects were admitted to the hospital
Approximately 2 weeks following DAIR procedure
Resource analysis
Time Frame: Approximately 2 weeks following DAIR procedure
Hospital admission cost comparison between the two study arms
Approximately 2 weeks following DAIR procedure
Clinical Outcome Scores
Time Frame: 1, 5, and 10 years following DAIR procedure
Evaluation of patient reported Harris Hip or Knee Society Scores
1, 5, and 10 years following DAIR procedure
Adverse events
Time Frame: 10 years following DAIR procedure
Total number of subjects to experience adverse events related to either drug or the surgical procedure
10 years following DAIR procedure
Survivorship
Time Frame: 10 years following DAIR procedure
Total number of subject deaths post-surgical DAIR procedure
10 years following DAIR procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mayo Clinic

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Columbia University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Matthew Abdel, MD, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 3, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2032

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2032

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 28, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 7, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 10, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 22-006739

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings