Probability of Optimal Target Attainment of Amikacin in Patients With Febrile Neutropenia During Treatment for a Hematological Disorder

February 20, 2024 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Probability of Optimal Target Attainment of Amikacin in Patients With Febrile Neutropenia During Treatment for a Hematological Disorder: a Prospective, Single-centre Study and PKPD-analysis

The present trial is a single center, prospective, observational pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PKPD) cohort study investigating whether patients suffering from a hematological disorder and treated with amikacin due to febrile neutropenia (FN) achieve the predefined amikacin target concentration (Cmax ≥60 mg/L).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Amikacin is an aminoglycoside (AG) that exerts a rapid bactericidal effect against many Gram-negative pathogens. Its pharmacological effect depends on the peak concentration achieved. However, a common side effect of AG is dose-dependent acute kidney injury (AKI), especially when administered over several days due to an accumulation of the drug in the proximal renal tubular cells. In patients in advanced stage of a hematological disease, low body weight influences amikacin pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PKPD) and increases its clearance. However, there is little known about amikacin PKPD in patients with febrile neutropenia (FN). Whereas the therapeutic efficacy is associated with the peak concentration of AG, toxicity of AG depends on the area under the curve (AUC) or trough level of the drug. When using the AUC to predict renal toxicity, an AUC between 200 and 300 mg/L * h of amikacin has been proposed as a potential threshold for renal toxicity. At the University Hospital Basel (USB), amikacin is administered intravenously (iv) as once daily infusion combined with cefepime or piperacillin/tazobactam immediately after the occurrence of a fever spike in patients with FN. After the iv administration of amikacin, peak concentration is achieved after 30-60 min. The in-house guidelines recommend the administration of lower amikacin dosages compared to other published studies (15 mg/kg body weight vs. 20 mg/kg or up to 30 mg/kg). It remains unclear if adequate peak concentrations are achieved in patients with FN, when lower amikacin doses are administered. The aim of this study is to investigate the probability of optimal pharmacological target attainment (Cmax ≥60 mg/L) during amikacin treatment among patients with FN treated for hematological disorder in order to evaluate the in-house amikacin dosage recommendations. The current project includes the sampling of biological material during hospital admission and the collection of health-related personal data.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
92

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
      • Basel, Switzerland, 4031
        • University Hospital Basel, Division of Internal Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Inpatients being at risk of developing FN after treatment for a hematological disorder, admitted to the Department of Internal Medicine or the Department of Hematology at the University Hospital Basel (USB) and who are intended to receive amikacin iv during their hospital stay will be screened for eligibility.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Informed consent (IC) as documented by signature
  • Documented hematological disorder
  • Hospitalization at the USB due to the treatment for a hematological disorder (e.g. chemotherapy, stem cell transplantation)
  • Being at risk of developing FN during the hospital stay (e.g. because of chemotherapy)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous enrolment into the current study
  • Outpatients
  • Patients undergoing hemodialysis
  • Women who are pregnant (special pharmacokinetic)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pharmacological target attainment (Cmax ≥60 mg/L) in blood during amikacin treatment
Time Frame: 60 minutes (+/-30 minutes) and 8 hours (+/-1 hour) after the beginning of amikacin infusion on day 1, day 2 and day 3
Percentage of patients with optimal pharmacological target attainment (Cmax ≥60 mg/L) in blood during amikacin treatment
60 minutes (+/-30 minutes) and 8 hours (+/-1 hour) after the beginning of amikacin infusion on day 1, day 2 and day 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
AUC >200 mg/L and AUC >300 mg/L* h during amikacin treatment
Time Frame: Up to 3 days after the beginning of amikacin infusion
Percentage of patients achieving the threshold of potential renal toxicity defined as AUC >200 mg/L and AUC >300 mg/L* h respectively during amikacin treatment
Up to 3 days after the beginning of amikacin infusion
Percentage of patients achieving a calculated Cmin <4 mg/L in blood
Time Frame: Up to 3 days after the beginning of amikacin infusion
Percentage of patients achieving a calculated Cmin <4 mg/L in blood during amikacin treatment
Up to 3 days after the beginning of amikacin infusion
Incidence of Acute kidney injury (AKI)
Time Frame: Within 7 days after application of amikacin
Incidence of AKI
Within 7 days after application of amikacin
Percentage of patients with optimal pharmacological target attainment
Time Frame: Up to 3 days after the beginning of amikacin infusion
Percentage of patients with optimal pharmacological target attainment using a Cmax/minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥8 in patients with an identified causative pathogen
Up to 3 days after the beginning of amikacin infusion
Time interval between the detection of the first fever spike and the administration of amikacin
Time Frame: One time assessment at baseline (Day 1)
Time interval between the detection of the first fever spike and the administration of amikacin
One time assessment at baseline (Day 1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Osthoff, PD Dr. med., University Hospital Basel, Division of Internal Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 21, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 2, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 2, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 9, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 19, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 21, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 20, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2022-01218; am23Osthoff

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings