TAVR in Adults With Pure Severe Aortic Regurgitation (SENSE-AR)

May 26, 2023 updated by: Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

Safety and Effectiveness of Transcatheter Treatment of Severe Native Aortic Regurgitation With Self-Expandable Valve Implantation: a Multicenter, Observational,Cohort Study(SENSE-AR)

The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with severe native valve aortic insufficiency. It is a multicentre, observational cohort study. The primary endpoint consisted of a composite of all-cause death, disabling stroke, or rehospitalization for heart failure at 12 months postoperatively. According to previous research results and opinions of expert groups, the sample size was expected to be 76 cases.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
76

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510123
        • Recruiting
        • Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with severe aortic regurgitation undergo transcatheter aortic valve replacement in medical centers

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 60 years;
  • Patients with severe aortic regurgitation (> grade 3) diagnosed by transthoracic echocardiography should meet any of the following conditions for semi-quantitative assessment of the degree of aortic regurgitation and any condition for quantitative assessment of the degree of aortic regurgitation: (1) semi-quantitative assessment of the degree of aortic regurgitation: aortic regurgitation bundle width/left ventricular outflow tract diameter ≥ 65%; or aortic regurgitation neck width > 6 mm; or full-diastolic blood flow reflux in the proximal abdominal aorta; (2) quantitative assessment of the degree of aortic regurgitation: aortic regurgitation volume ≥ 60 ml/beat; or aortic regurgitation fraction ≥ 50%; or effective regurgitation orifice area ≥ 0.3 cm2
  • TAVR has been performed;
  • Patients can understand and voluntarily participate in this clinical study, sign informed consent, and adhere to clinical follow-up.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of aortic valve replacement;
  • Combined with moderate-severe mitral regurgitation and moderate aortic stenosis;
  • Acute endocarditis or other acute cardiac inflammation;
  • Allergic or contraindicated to related drugs (aspirin, clopidogrel, warfarin, contrast agent);
  • Other conditions judged by the investigator as not suitable for the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
TAVR group
The group that undergoes transcatheter aortic valve replacement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 12 months
Death caused by any reason
12 months
Disabling stroke
Time Frame: 12 months
Stroke that results in a disabled state
12 months
Rehospitalization for heart failure
Time Frame: 12 months
Rehospitalization for heart failure
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Device success
Time Frame: intraoperative
Absence of procedural mortality AND Correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location AND Intended performance of the prosthetic heart valve (no prosthesis- patient mismatch and mean aortic valve gradient <20 mmHg or peak velocity <3 m/s, AND no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation)
intraoperative
Perioperative complications
Time Frame: up to 1 week
Perioperative complications conclude Life-threatening bleeding, Acute kidney injury-Stage 2 or 3 (including renal replacement therapy), Coronary artery obstruction requiring intervention, Major vascular complications, and Valve-related dysfunction requiring repeat procedure (BAV, TAVI, or SAVR)
up to 1 week
New permanent pacemaker implantation(PPI)
Time Frame: up to 1 week

New PPI indications:

  1. persistent high-degree AV block
  2. sick sinus syndrome
up to 1 week
New complete left bundle branch block(CLBBB)
Time Frame: up to 1 week

Diagnostic criteria are defined as follows:

  1. Rhythm must be of super-ventricular origin (EG: ventricular activation coming from atrial or AV nodal activation)
  2. QRS Duration greater than 120 ms
  3. Lead V1 should have either a QS or a small r wave with large S wave
  4. Lead V6 should have a notched R wave and no Q wave.
up to 1 week
Valve-related dysfunction
Time Frame: 12 months
Mean aortic valve gradient ≥20 mmHg, EOA ≤0.9-1.1 cm and DVI <0.35 m/s, and/or moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation, and/or Prosthetic valve endocarditis, and/or Prosthetic valve thrombosis
12 months
NYHA class Ill or IV
Time Frame: 12 months
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) class Ill or IV
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
October 1, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 19, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 21, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 30, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 26, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SYSKY-2022-518-01

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings