AMIC vs. MFx in the Ankle (AMARTA)

March 15, 2024 updated by: Geistlich Pharma AG

A Prospective, Double Blind, Single-centre, Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Arthroscopic Autologous Matrix Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC®) to Microfracture Alone in the Treatment of Osteochondral and Chondral Lesion in the Ankle (AMARTA)

This clinical investigation is a prospective, double blind, single-centre, randomised controlled trial comparing arthroscopic autologous matrix induced chondrogenesis (AMIC®) to microfracture alone in the treatment of osteochondral and chondral lesion in the ankle to evaluate effectiveness, performance and safety of AMIC® procedure versus microfracture (MFx).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This clinical investigation compares arthroscopic autologous matrix induced chondrogenesis (AMIC®) to microfracture alone in the treatment of osteochondral and chondral lesion in the ankle to evaluate effectiveness, performance and safety of AMIC® procedure versus microfracture (MFx). It is a prospective, double blind, single-centre, randomised controlled trial. The objective of this clinical investigation is to evaluate performance, effectiveness, and safety of AMIC® procedure versus Microfracture (MFx). The effectiveness of the treatment is measured by the difference in the walking/standing- part score taken from the Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOX-FQ) from baseline to 12 months. The secondary endpoints concern clinical safety and performance. Patients will be randomized into two groups: Microfracture alone (MFx) or Bone Marrow Stimulation (Microfracture) with Chondro-Gide® (AMIC®). The investigational device will be assessed within its intended use.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
      • Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE7 7DN
        • Freeman Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Signed written informed consent
  • Diagnosis of symptomatic osteochondral or chondral lesion of the talus, deemed by surgeon amenable to arthroscopic treatment with debridement and microfracture
  • Age of 18-65 years
  • Subject is willing and able to comply with all study procedures, including visits, diagnostic procedures, the rehabilitation protocol and responding to patient questionnaire follow up

Exclusion criteria:

  • Lesions smaller 1 square centimeters and greater than 4 square centimeters based on the MRI
  • Malalignment which is not corrected prior to or as part of same surgery
  • Established significant hindfoot arthritis
  • Patients who are unable to have an MRI scan
  • Chronic inflammatory arthritis or infectious arthritis
  • History of autoimmune disease or immunodeficiency
  • History of connective tissue disease
  • Intra-articular steroid use within the 3 months prior to enrolment
  • Other intra-articular injections (e.g., hyaluronic acid) within 3 months prior to enrolment
  • The patient is currently being treated with radiation, chemotherapy, immunosuppression, or systemic steroid therapy with a dose equivalent to more than 5 mg prednisolone
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Enrolled in another study, involved in the study (as a researcher/investigator/sponsor), or relative of someone directly involved in the clinical investigation
  • Active infection of the index ankle
  • Has been prescribed medication to treat osteoporosis
  • Any disorder or impairment that would interfere with evaluation of outcomes measures, such as neurological, degenerative muscular, psychiatric, or cognitive conditions

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: AMIC®
Bone Marrow Stimulation (Microfracture) with Chondro-Gide®
Procedure: Microfracture (MFx)
The ankle arthroscopy will be a standard procedure. The lesion will be identified, measured and prepared with curettage and soft tissue shaver. Preparation includes debridement of the unstable cartilage and in case of a chondral defect associated with a bone defect, the subchondral cyst is debrided. After debridement, the defect is classified and the lesion size is measured again.The microfracture will be performed with a microfracture awl. In cases of a chondral defect associated with a bone defect (osteochondral defect) the bone lesion must be treated concomitantly. Portal closure will be with steri-strips. All patients will follow the standard postoperative rehabilitation protocol including post op non-weight bearing and range of motion exercises for 6 weeks.
Device: Chondro-Gide®
After the microfracture is performed and before the concomitant treatment of a bony lesion (if present), the defect size will be templated, and the membrane cut into its correct size. The joint is then drained and the membrane will be applied over the defect and stabilised with Fibrin glue. In cases of a osteochondral defect the bone lesion must be treated concomitantly. Once the bone defect has been treated, the Chondro-Gide® membrane is used to cover the site, and to support new cartilage tissue formation at the joint interface. Fluid will be reintroduced, and the stability of the membrane will be confirmed arthroscopically.
Active Comparator: Microfracture (MFx)
Microfracture alone
Procedure: Microfracture (MFx)
The ankle arthroscopy will be a standard procedure. The lesion will be identified, measured and prepared with curettage and soft tissue shaver. Preparation includes debridement of the unstable cartilage and in case of a chondral defect associated with a bone defect, the subchondral cyst is debrided. After debridement, the defect is classified and the lesion size is measured again.The microfracture will be performed with a microfracture awl. In cases of a chondral defect associated with a bone defect (osteochondral defect) the bone lesion must be treated concomitantly. Portal closure will be with steri-strips. All patients will follow the standard postoperative rehabilitation protocol including post op non-weight bearing and range of motion exercises for 6 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOX-FQ) walking/standing subscale
Time Frame: difference from baseline to 12 months post-operative
The effectiveness of the treatment is measured by the difference in the walking/standing- part score taken from the the MOX-FQ from baseline to 12 months. Raw score values for the walking/standing part are between 0-28, where higher score mean a worse outcome. Raw scores are converted to a metric (0-100).
difference from baseline to 12 months post-operative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOX-FQ) total
Time Frame: change at 12, 24 and 60 months from baseline
The MOX-FQ is a commonly reported scoring system in the literature with proven acceptability, reliability and responsiveness for assessment of patients undergoing various foot and ankle surgeries. The total score consists of 3 subscales: Pain, Walking/ Standing and Social interaction. Raw score values for the total score are between 0-64, where higher score mean a worse outcome. Raw scores are converted to a metric (0-100).
change at 12, 24 and 60 months from baseline
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle-Hind foot Score (AOFAS)
Time Frame: change at 12, 24 and 60 months from baseline
The AOFAS has been used as a tool to measure the functional outcome after foot and ankle surgery and is often regarded as an essential outcome measure for all clinical studies. The score ranges from 0 - 100, where higher scores mean better outcomes.
change at 12, 24 and 60 months from baseline
Foot Functioning Index (FFI)
Time Frame: change at 12, 24 and 60 months from baseline
The FFI measures a patient's function in terms of pain, disability, and activity restriction to assess the impact of foot pathology. The index is self-administered and consists of 23 items, each scored 0 - 10, divided into three sub-scales. Higher scores mean decreased function.
change at 12, 24 and 60 months from baseline
Tegner activity scale (TAS)
Time Frame: change at 12, 24 and 60 months from pre-symptomatic score
The TAS determines a patient's activity level by grading their work and sports-based activity on a scale of 0 to 10. It is a one-item score and has proven its psychometric properties in knee surgery patients.
change at 12, 24 and 60 months from pre-symptomatic score
EuroQol-5 Dimensions 5 Level (EQ5D-5L)
Time Frame: change at 12, 24 and 60 months from baseline
EQ5D-5L has been shown to be responsive in detecting changes in patient health status after foot and ankle surgery. The EQ5D-5L is widely used as a general health status measures for a wide variety of conditions and enables comparisons of health-related quality of life between different conditions. A summary index is derived from the patients answers, by applying a specific formula.
change at 12, 24 and 60 months from baseline
Magnetic resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score
Time Frame: change at 24 and 60 months from baseline
The MOCART score was originally designed for evaluation of the cartilage in the knee, after procedures like microfracturing, and has a broad use to assess AMIC® in talus. The score is based on nine radiologic variables; degree of repair and defect filling, integration to border tissue, surface and structure of repair tissue, subchondral lamina and bone, adhesions and synovitis. The Score ranges from 0 - 100, where higher scores mean a better outcome.
change at 24 and 60 months from baseline
Safety endpoints
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 5 years
Safety will be measured by freedom from device and procedure-related serious adverse events (SADEs) and all other Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) occurred.
through study completion, an average of 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Geistlich Pharma AG

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Despoina Natsiou Schmiady, Dr., Geistlich Pharma AG
  • Principal Investigator: Torres Paulo, Mr., Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 28, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 6, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 6, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 1, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 14, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 23, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 18, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 15, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 13575-236

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings