SURPASS Retrospective Study

March 20, 2023 updated by: Sung Gwe Ahn, Gangnam Severance Hospital

Outcomes of Sentinel Node Biopsy According to MRI Response in an Association With the Subtypes in cN1-3 Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy

This study aimed to determine whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) could be a reliable option for evaluating nodal status in patients who had responded well to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST), even if they had initially presented with a high nodal burden. The study investigated the outcomes of SLNB followed by axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in this patient population, taking into account the response to NAST and the breast cancer subtype.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

To determine the feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in this study, the investigators evaluated the false-negative rate (FNR) of SLNB. The FNR was calculated as the number of patients with negative SLNs who had a residual disease in the rest of the axillary lymph nodes (ALNs) divided by the total number of patients with residual disease in either the SLNs, the rest of the ALNs, or both: FN/true-positive + FN. The investigators compared the FNR of the SLNB according to the radiologic response measured using breast MRI in each subtype. The investigators further evaluated the FNR in subgroups stratified by clinical nodal stage. Additionally, the investigators assessed additional metastatic ALNs in cases with 1-2 metastatic SLNs through the completion of ALN dissection.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
500

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

This study included patients diagnosed with breast cancer who received neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) followed by curative surgery between January 2013 and December 2018. All patients were cN1-3 breast cancer at initial presentation In addition, all patients underwent sentinely lymph node biopsy (SLNB) followed by axillary lymph node dissection.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • cN1-3 breast cancer at initial presentation
  • received neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST)
  • received sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) followed by additional axillary lymph node dissection (ALND)
  • breast MRI performed at baseline and post-NAST.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • case with unavailable data for breast MRI and operation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Multicenter retrospective cohort
This study included patients diagnosed with breast cancer who received neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) followed by curative surgery between January 2013 and December 2018. All patients were cN1-3 breast cancer at initial presentation confirmed by any imaging studies (either ultrasonography or MRI) or pathological examination using ultrasonography-guided needle biopsy of suspicious axillary lymph nodes. The clinical nodal stage was determined based on findings from physical examination, with imaging studies such as ultrasonography or MRI taken into account, according to the American Join Committee on Cancer guidelines (7th edition). In addition, all patients underwent sentinely lymph node biopsy (SLNB) followed by axillary lymph node dissection. SLNB was performed using a radioactive marker, blue dye, or both (dual tracers).
Procedure: Sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by axillary lymph node dissection
This is a retrospective study to determine the feasibility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) according to response to NAST and breast cancer subtypes. All patients received SLNB followed by axillary lymph node dissection after NAST.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
False negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy according to radiologic response stratified by brest cancer subtype
Time Frame: up to 1 month after the breast surgery
False negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy according to radiologic response stratified by brest cancer subtype
up to 1 month after the breast surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
False negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy according to clinical nodal stage
Time Frame: up to 1 month after the breast surgery
False negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy according to clinical nodal stage
up to 1 month after the breast surgery
Additional axillary lymph node metastasis rate in patients with 1-2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes
Time Frame: up to 1 month after the breast surgery
Additional axillary lymph node metastasis rate in patients with 1-2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes
up to 1 month after the breast surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Gangnam Severance Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 9, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 20, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 20, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 3-2022-0362

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings