Evaluating Safety and Efficacy of Prostate-sparing Radical Cystectomy

November 17, 2025 updated by: Johns Hopkins University

A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Prostate Capsule-sparing and Nerve-sparing Radical Cystectomy in Patients With Bladder Cancer

The purpose of this clinical trial is to determine if prostate-capsule-sparing cystectomy improves functional outcomes without comprising oncologic outcomes in male patients receiving a radical cystectomy. Patients will be randomized to one of two groups: prostate capsule-sparing radical cystectomy or nerve-sparing radical cystectomy. Patients will be monitored following standard of care guidelines and clinical data will be collected. Patients in both groups will be asked to complete an erectile function questionnaire at multiple timepoints. Patients who receive an orthotopic neobladder will be asked to complete a questionnaire to monitor urinary function at multiple timepoints. Patient adverse events will be monitored to ensure patients safety.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to determine if prostate capsule-sparing cystectomy improves functional outcomes without compromising the oncologic outcomes in patients with bladder cancer. The comparison arm will be patients undergoing nerve-sparing radical cystectomy. Participants will be randomized to receive either a nerve-sparing radical cystectomy or a prostate capsule-sparing radical cystectomy. Patients will be monitored following standard of care guidelines every 3-months post-operatively up to and including 24 months post-operatively. As part of standard of care post-operative follow-up patients will have routine history and physical exams, urine cytology, urine culture, Complete Blood Count (CBC), Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP), and Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA). Standard of Care diagnostic imaging will also occur. The Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) Questionnaire will be given to patients 6-weeks post-operatively and every 3-months post-operatively up to and including 24-months post-operatively. To measure urinary function in patients who receive orthotopic neobladder, the Validated Pad Questionnaire will be given 6-weeks post-operatively and every 3-months post-operatively up to and including 24-months post operatively. Adverse Events will be monitored in both groups as defined by the CTCAE 5.0 guidelines.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
70

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • United States
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States, 20016
        • Recruiting
        • Sibley Memorial Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21287
        • Recruiting
        • Johns Hopkins Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with pathologically confirmed bladder cancer scheduled for radical cystectomy
  • Variant histologies of bladder cancer permitted
  • Neoadjuvant therapy permitted
  • Age > 18 years old
  • Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients that are not candidates for cystectomy
  • Moderate to severe erectile dysfunction with SHIM score <17
  • Bladder cancer with bladder neck or prostatic involvement, including cancer in the prostatic urethra
  • Prior pelvic radiation
  • Confirmed prostate cancer:
  • Patients with abnormal Digital rectal exam (DRE), PSA >3 or Prostate Imaging Reporting & Data System (PIRADS) 4 lesions on prostate Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) will undergo prostate biopsy to rule out prostate cancer
  • Increased genetic risk of prostate cancer per National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines:
  • ≥1 first-, second-, or third-degree relative with: breast cancer at age ≤50 y, colorectal or endometrial cancer at age ≤50 y, male breast cancer at any age, ovarian cancer at any age, exocrine pancreatic cancer at any age, metastatic, regional, very-high-risk, high-risk prostate cancer at any age
  • ≥1 first-degree relative (father or brother) with: prostate cancer at age ≤60 y
  • ≥2 first-, second-, or third-degree relatives with: breast cancer at any age, prostate cancer at any age
  • ≥3 first- or second-degree relatives with: Lynch syndrome-related cancers, especially if diagnosed
  • Patients with Lynch syndrome

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Prostate Capsule-Sparing Radical Cystectomy
Patients randomized to this arm will receive the prostate capsule-sparing surgery performed in the form of standard simple prostatectomy. Patients will also have a cystectomy with one of the following urinary diversions: ileal conduit, Indiana Pouch, or orthotopic neobladder.
Procedure: Prostate capsule-sparing radical cystectomy
Patients randomized to this arm will receive the prostate capsule-sparing surgery performed in the form of standard simple prostatectomy. Patients will also have a cystectomy with one of the following urinary diversions: ileal conduit, Indiana Pouch, or orthotopic neobladder.
Other: Nerve-Sparing Radical Cystectomy
Patients randomized to this arm will receive the nerve-sparing surgery will be performed in the form of the standard nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Patients will also have a cystectomy with one of the following urinary diversions: ileal conduit, Indiana Pouch, or orthotopic neobladder.
Procedure: Nerve sparing radical cystectomy
Patients randomized to this arm will receive the nerve-sparing surgery will be performed in the form of the standard nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Patients will also have a cystectomy with one of the following urinary diversions: ileal conduit, Indiana Pouch, or orthotopic neobladder.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Functional Outcomes as assessed by the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks-post operatively, 3-months post-operatively, 6-months post-operatively, 9-months post-operatively, 12-months post-operatively, 15-months post-operatively, 18-months post-operatively, 21-months post-operatively, 24-months post-op
Comparison of functional outcomes focusing on preservation of erectile function in patients undergoing cystectomy for bladder cancer. Functional Outcomes will be measured by the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) Questionnaire. The Sexual Health Inventory for Men defines the following ranges of Erectile Dysfunction (ED): 1-7 is Severe ED, 8-11 Moderate ED, 12-16 Mild to Moderate ED, and 17 to 21 is Mild ED.
Baseline, 6 weeks-post operatively, 3-months post-operatively, 6-months post-operatively, 9-months post-operatively, 12-months post-operatively, 15-months post-operatively, 18-months post-operatively, 21-months post-operatively, 24-months post-op

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in urinary function in patients with orthotopic neobladder as assessed by the Validated Pad Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks-post operatively, 3-months post-operatively, 6-months post-operatively, 9-months post-operatively, 12-months post-operatively, 15-months post-operatively, 18-months post-operatively, 21-months post-operatively , 24-months post-op
Urinary function in patient with orthotopic neobladder urinary diversions measured using the Validated Pad Questionnaire. The Validated Pad questionnaire will be used to determine the percentage of patients utilizing 1 to 2 pads versus 2 or more pads for night and day, respectively.
Baseline, 6 weeks-post operatively, 3-months post-operatively, 6-months post-operatively, 9-months post-operatively, 12-months post-operatively, 15-months post-operatively, 18-months post-operatively, 21-months post-operatively , 24-months post-op
Change in overall patient survival
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks-post operatively, 3-months post-operatively, 6-months post-operatively, 9-months post-operatively, 12-months post-operatively, 15-months post-operatively, 18-months post-operatively, 21-months post-operatively, 24-months post-op
Comparing the overall survival of patients in both arms of the study
Baseline, 6 weeks-post operatively, 3-months post-operatively, 6-months post-operatively, 9-months post-operatively, 12-months post-operatively, 15-months post-operatively, 18-months post-operatively, 21-months post-operatively, 24-months post-op
Change in disease specific status
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks-post operatively, 3-months post-operatively, 6-months post-operatively, 9-months post-operatively, 12-months post-operatively, 15-months post-operatively, 18-months post-operatively, 21-months post-operatively, 24-months post-op
Comparing the status of disease specific in both arms of the study
Baseline, 6 weeks-post operatively, 3-months post-operatively, 6-months post-operatively, 9-months post-operatively, 12-months post-operatively, 15-months post-operatively, 18-months post-operatively, 21-months post-operatively, 24-months post-op
Soft tissue surgical margin rate as assessed by pathology
Time Frame: Up to 4-weeks after surgical intervention
Pathologists will examine the soft tissue surgical margin rate to determine positive or negative soft tissue surgical margin.
Up to 4-weeks after surgical intervention
Safety as assessed by adverse events experienced by study participants
Time Frame: Up to 24-months post-operative
Comparing the differences in adverse events (grades 2-5) as experienced by the participants of in each study arm. The grading of adverse events are defined by the CTCAE 5.0 guidelines.
Up to 24-months post-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Johns Hopkins University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Armine Smith, MD, Johns Hopkins University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 25, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 28, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 31, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 17, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00345549

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings