Post-Operative Evaluation of Endodontic Microsurgeries Done Using a Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Technique: An in Vivo Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Cairo, Egypt, 11651
- Al-Azhar University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Mandibular first molar teeth were selected according to specific inclusion criteria including:
- Teeth presented with failed non-surgical treatment or re-treatment. Failure is due to iatrogenic errors at the apical 3mm of the mesial root canal including canal ledging, zipping and transportation, root perforation, separated instrument and canal calcification.
- Teeth presented with normal pocket depth ranges from 1 to 3mm, up to grade II tooth mobility.
- Teeth presented without periapical radiolucency (Class A) or with periapical radiolucency not more than 1 mm in diameter both mesiodistally and buccolingually (Class B) according to the preoperative endodontic microsurgical classification of teeth.
- Teeth presented with non-fused mesial and distal roots and the mesial roots are range from 10 to 15 mm. in length, Type III root canal configuration (Two canals run separately from orifice to apex). The root canal curvature angle was measured using the Weine technique to be not less than 160° in both directions buccolingually and mesiodistally.
- At the apical 3 mm of the mesial radiographic root apex, the distance from the outer surface of the buccal cortical plate of bone to the buccal side of the mesial root is 1.5 mm (Depth I). The buccolingual dimension of the mesial root is 7 mm mm (Depth II). The distance from the lingual surface of the mesial root to the outer surface of the lingual cortical plate of bone is 3.5 mm. (Depth III).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Piezosurgery assisted group
A Piezosurgery assisted cavity preparation was performed using a IM4A Piezosurgery tip mounted in the handpiece of a Piezosurgery device (PIEZOSURGERY touch, Mectron, Carasco, Italy) at an operating frequency in the range of 24 to 36 kHz with power ratings 55 W for osteotomy and root-end resection
|
apicectomy will be done using the Piezosurgery device
|
|
Experimental: Trephine Burs assisted group
Trephine bur assisted cavity preparation was performed using a TPB-4 trephine bur mounted in 20:1 contra angled handpiece of an implant motor (ImplaNX, Micro-NX, Republic of Korea) at an operating speed in the range of 800 to 1200 / Torque 30 N for osteotomy and root-end resection
|
apicectomy will be done using the trephine burs
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative pain assessment
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
The postoperative pain assessment was done using the modified verbal descriptor scale as follows; None (Score 0), Mild (Score 1), Moderate (Score 2), and Severe (Score 3).
|
24 hours
|
|
Postoperative pain assessment
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
The postoperative pain assessment was done using the modified verbal descriptor scale as follows; None (Score 0), Mild (Score 1), Moderate (Score 2), and Severe (Score 3).
|
48 hours
|
|
Postoperative pain assessment
Time Frame: 72 hours
|
The postoperative pain assessment was done using the modified verbal descriptor scale as follows; None (Score 0), Mild (Score 1), Moderate (Score 2), and Severe (Score 3).
|
72 hours
|
|
Postoperative pain assessment
Time Frame: 96 hours
|
The postoperative pain assessment was done using the modified verbal descriptor scale as follows; None (Score 0), Mild (Score 1), Moderate (Score 2), and Severe (Score 3).
|
96 hours
|
|
Postoperative pain assessment
Time Frame: 120 hours
|
The postoperative pain assessment was done using the modified verbal descriptor scale as follows; None (Score 0), Mild (Score 1), Moderate (Score 2), and Severe (Score 3).
|
120 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Postoperative swelling assessment
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Patients were instructed to the description of each level of swelling as follows; None (Score 0), Mild (Score 1), Moderate (Score 2), and Severe (Score 3).
|
24 hours
|
|
Postoperative swelling assessment
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
Patients were instructed to the description of each level of swelling as follows; None (Score 0), Mild (Score 1), Moderate (Score 2), and Severe (Score 3).
|
48 hours
|
|
Postoperative swelling assessment
Time Frame: 72 hours
|
Patients were instructed to the description of each level of swelling as follows; None (Score 0), Mild (Score 1), Moderate (Score 2), and Severe (Score 3).
|
72 hours
|
|
Postoperative swelling assessment
Time Frame: 96 hours
|
Patients were instructed to the description of each level of swelling as follows; None (Score 0), Mild (Score 1), Moderate (Score 2), and Severe (Score 3).
|
96 hours
|
|
Postoperative swelling assessment
Time Frame: 120 hours
|
Patients were instructed to the description of each level of swelling as follows; None (Score 0), Mild (Score 1), Moderate (Score 2), and Severe (Score 3).
|
120 hours
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Post-operative CBCT scans
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Evaluation of surgical endodontic healing according to Modified PENN 3D criteria
|
6 months
|
|
Post-operative CBCT scans
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Evaluation of surgical endodontic healing according to Modified PENN 3D criteria
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 31/5/2020
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.