3D-printed Reconstruction Automated Matching System Predicts Size of Double-lumen Tube: a Prospective Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial
Effect of 3D-printed Reconstruction Automated Matching System in Size Selection of Double-lumen Tube:a Prospective Double-blinded Randomised Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Xin Wang, master
- Phone Number: +8685420443
- Email: 675202449@qq.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged between 18 and 75 years.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) I-III.
- Planned to receive lung resection surgery during lung isolation techniques by using DLT.
- Signed informed written consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
The participant experiences any of the following:
- Spinal malformation,
- Expected difficult airway
- Tracheal stenosis
- Tracheal tumor
- Bronchial tumor
- Distorted airway anatomy
- Tumors of the mouth or neck
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 3D group
In 3D group, the investigator will intubate using DLT chosen by an automatic comparison software for 3D reconstruction based on CT data (3DRACS).
|
it is an automatic comparison software for 3D reconstruction based on CT data (3DRACS).
It reconstructs the trachea and bronchus and compares them with the DLT, predicting the most suitable size and depth of the DLT for lung isolation.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: control group
In control group, the size of DLT is based on patient's sex and weight and the height is used to guide the depth of DLT insertion.
|
In control group, the size of DLT is based on patient's sex and weight and the height is used to guide the depth of DLT insertion.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of correct endobronchial intubation.
Time Frame: after intubation
|
Conventional blindly endobronchial intubation is performed firstly and clinical verification was made by the same anesthesiologist, followed by the supervising anesthesiologist using a FOB to check DLT position and successful intubation was considered if the position was proper.
|
after intubation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to successful intubation
Time Frame: after intubation
|
after completion of induction, the vocal cords are exposed using visual laryngoscopy and Cormack-Lehane grading is performed.
The stopwatch is timed as soon as the cuff of DLT crosses the vocal cords and it stops when (1) intubating anesthesiologist consider the DLT is correctly positioned, (2) after a maximum of three attempts have been made, (3) the intubating anesthesiologist think DLT placed correctly is impossible.
Each attempt is defined as returning the bronchial lumen of the DLT to the trachea and then attempting to reinsert it.
If the DLT is unsuccessfully placed, the intubation will be performed under FOB guidance by the supervising anesthesiologist.
This intubation time of supervising anesthesiologist is also counted as part of the successful intubation time.
|
after intubation
|
|
Degree of pulmonary atrophy
Time Frame: after surgery begin
|
it is a subjective score of 0-10 by the surgeon, ten mean very perfect, zero represent no pulmonary atrophy at all.
|
after surgery begin
|
|
Grading of airway injury
Time Frame: When extubation
|
an anesthesiologist over 10 years of FOB experience will assess tracheal and vocal cord related injuries from DLT intubation.
Before DLT is prepared to extubation, FOB will be inserted into the bronchial lumen and the tracheal injury will be observed through the FOB along with DLT extubated.
All images from the FOB assessment are saved as a video and it will be viewed are by another blinded endoscopist to assess the injury of vocal cords.
The severity of tracheal injury was defined as follows: mild (redness, oedema, one to three speckled haemorrhagic lesions), moderate (over 3 mild lesions or one diffuse haemorrhagic lesion) and severe (more than 2 diffuse haemorrhagic lesions).
With regard to the vocal cords, the types of lesions are classified as follows: (1) oedema, swelling of the mucosa; (2) petechiae, small red spots on the mucosa; (3) haematoma, bleeding into the mucosa.
|
When extubation
|
|
Postoperative sore throat and hoarseness
Time Frame: At 1 hour and 24 hours after extubation
|
sore throat is defined as persistent resting pain in the throat region, and throat pain scores were assessed by VAS score (0: no pain; 10: the most unbearable pain).
Hoarseness is defined as a change in the quality of voice noted by the patient.
|
At 1 hour and 24 hours after extubation
|
|
Oxygenation during one-lung ventilation
Time Frame: Intraoperative(from beginning of one lung ventilation to end),an average of 2 hours
|
it is defined as the area under the curve of the SpO2/FiO2 ratio during OLV.
The SpO2 and FiO2 values are automatically collected by the monitor at 30 second intervals and any abnormal data due to equipment or human error will be replaced with the previous correct data.
|
Intraoperative(from beginning of one lung ventilation to end),an average of 2 hours
|
|
Account times of using FOB
Time Frame: During surgery (from induction to extubation), an average of 3 hour
|
it was defined that FOB was inserted into the tracheal tube and then withdrawn from the tracheal tube from induction to extubation.
|
During surgery (from induction to extubation), an average of 3 hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Yihao Zhu, master, department of anesthesiology, sichuan cancer hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- SCCHEC-02-2022-155
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.