Walking Aid and Locomotion Knowledge in Emergency Rooms (WALKER 1) for Elderly People (WALKER 1)
Walking Aid and Locomotion Knowledge in Emergency Rooms (WALKER 1): Training and Provision of Walking Aids to Promote Autonomy and Mobility of Elderly People in Emergency Care - a Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Renato F Righetti, PhD
- Email: refragar@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
São Paulo, Brazil, 01308-050
- Hospital Sírio Libanês
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 65 years or older
- Admitted to the Geriatric Emergency Department of Hospital Sírio-Libanês
- Willing and able to give informed consent
- Least one of the following for indication and training of mobility aids: reduction of postural instability; improvement of motor control; increase of somatosensory feedback; reduction of biomechanical overload; safe promotion of autonomy; fall history (in the last six months).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Altered level of conscience
- need for supplemental oxygen (≥3L/min)
- respiratory distress
- hemodynamic instability
- postural instability with a tendency to fall backward
- cognitive impairment that limits the use of walking aids
- hospitalization after Emergency Department evaluation
- Delirium
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Walking aid (WA) group
Participants will receive the walking aid and training in the use of the device.
|
A physiotherapist will identify the mobility needs and will indicate the most appropriate walking aid (cane or walker).
Participants will receive verbal guidance and printed material with guidance on safe walking and fall prevention.
|
|
Experimental: Walking aid with telemonitoring (WAT) group
Participants will receive the walking aid and training in the use of the device associated with telemonitoring.
|
A physiotherapist will identify the mobility needs and will indicate the most appropriate walking aid (cane or walker).
Participants will receive verbal guidance and printed material with guidance on safe walking and fall prevention.
Telemonitoring will occur every two weeks for three months after the emergency department discharge, through video call (about 15 minutes).
On these opportunities, the importance of using mobile devices and the guidance on safe gait will be reinforced.
|
|
Other: Control group
Participants will receive verbal guidance and printed material.
|
Participants will receive verbal guidance and printed material with guidance on safe walking and fall prevention.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Life-Space Assessment (LSA)
Time Frame: At baseline and after completion of the 3 and 6 months intervention to assess change
|
LSA is a scale which allows the characterization of mobility in life-spaces specifically frequency, need for mobility aids and the help of third party in the last 4 weeks
|
At baseline and after completion of the 3 and 6 months intervention to assess change
|
|
Falls Efficacy Scale International (FES-I)
Time Frame: At baseline, immediately after the intervention and after completion of the 3 and 6 months intervention to assess change
|
Assesses fear of falling
|
At baseline, immediately after the intervention and after completion of the 3 and 6 months intervention to assess change
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Timed Up and Go test (TUG)
Time Frame: At baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
TUG evaluate mobility, balance, gait, and risk of falling
|
At baseline and immediately after the intervention
|
|
One-minute sit-to-stand test
Time Frame: At baseline and after completion of the 3 and 6 months intervention to assess change
|
Functional capacity assessment by sit and stand completely in a chair (as often as possible during 1 minute)
|
At baseline and after completion of the 3 and 6 months intervention to assess change
|
|
Katz index
Time Frame: At baseline and after completion of the 3 and 6 months intervention to assess change
|
Katz index is a scale which evaluate basic activities of daily living
|
At baseline and after completion of the 3 and 6 months intervention to assess change
|
|
Barthel index
Time Frame: At baseline and after completion of the 3 and 6 months intervention to assess change
|
Barthel index is a scale which evaluates the autonomy for self-care, in addition to mobility
|
At baseline and after completion of the 3 and 6 months intervention to assess change
|
|
Lawton-Brody scale
Time Frame: At baseline and after completion of the 3 and 6 months intervention to assess change
|
Lawton-Brody scale evaluate Instrumental activities of daily living
|
At baseline and after completion of the 3 and 6 months intervention to assess change
|
|
Euro Quality of Life Instrument-5D (EQ-5D)
Time Frame: At baseline and after completion of the 3 and 6 months intervention to assess change
|
EQ-5D evaluate quality of life in five health dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression, and self-rated health on a visual analog scale
|
At baseline and after completion of the 3 and 6 months intervention to assess change
|
|
Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15)
Time Frame: At baseline and after completion of the 3 and 6 months intervention to assess change
|
Assesses mood disorders
|
At baseline and after completion of the 3 and 6 months intervention to assess change
|
|
10-Point Cognitive Screener (10-CS)
Time Frame: At baseline and after completion of the 3 and 6 months intervention to assess change
|
10-CS consists of a brief cognitive screening which evaluate temporal orientation, verbal fluency and three-word recall
|
At baseline and after completion of the 3 and 6 months intervention to assess change
|
|
Fall History
Time Frame: At baseline and after completion of the 3 and 6 months intervention to assess change
|
Fall history evaluate occurrence of falls (including data location, associated injuries, need for special care after the fall) and the total number of falls
|
At baseline and after completion of the 3 and 6 months intervention to assess change
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kennedy RE, Williams CP, Sawyer P, Lo AX, Connelly K, Nassel A, Brown CJ. Life-Space Predicts Health Care Utilization in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. J Aging Health. 2019 Feb;31(2):280-292. doi: 10.1177/0898264317730487. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
- Shimada H, Sawyer P, Harada K, Kaneya S, Nihei K, Asakawa Y, Yoshii C, Hagiwara A, Furuna T, Ishizaki T. Predictive validity of the classification schema for functional mobility tests in instrumental activities of daily living decline among older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Feb;91(2):241-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.10.027.
- Brown CJ, Kennedy RE, Lo AX, Williams CP, Sawyer P. Impact of Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalization on Mobility Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Am J Med. 2016 Oct;129(10):1124.e9-1124.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.05.016. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
- van den Berg N, Schumann M, Kraft K, Hoffmann W. Telemedicine and telecare for older patients--a systematic review. Maturitas. 2012 Oct;73(2):94-114. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.06.010. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
- Bateni H, Maki BE. Assistive devices for balance and mobility: benefits, demands, and adverse consequences. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Jan;86(1):134-45. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.023.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- AVAP-NG 2999
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.