Episodic Memory Integration and Interference
A Basic Science Study on Episodic Memory Integration and Interference in Healthy Adults
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Erin Sibley
- Phone Number: 617.552.1758
- Email: erin.sibley@bc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, United States, 02467
- Boston College
-
Contact:
- Elizabeth Kensinger
- Phone Number: 617-552-1350
- Email: elizabeth.kensinger@bc.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All participants: willing and able to follow the protocol
- All participants: fluent in English
- Online participants: online account in the crowdsourcing platform that will be used (e.g., Prolific)
Exclusion Criteria:
- All participants: history of a psychiatric or neurological condition, and/or current psychotropic drug use (indicated by the participant)
- fMRI participants: pregnant, metal in body (incl piercings or metallic makeup if unwilling to remove), unable to lie still for duration of scan (e.g., due to pain), Meniere's disease, claustrophobic, or other contraindication for MRI as determined my MRI technician, left-handed
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Emotional memory updating paradigm
All participants will encode AB/AC word pairs shown with images that have differing emotional valence (positive, negative, or neutral)
|
On Day 1, all participants will encode AB neutral word pairs (e.g., Pencil - Car) shown with positive, negative, or neutral images.
On Day 2, all participants will encode AC neutral words pairs (e.g., Pencil - Book) alongside images of either the same or different valence.
The emotional similarity of AB (Day 1) and AC (Day 2) image contexts (i.e., the independent variable) will consist of the following conditions: positive-positive, positive-negative, negative-negative, negative-positive, neutral-neutral, neutral-positive, and neutral-negative.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Memory for the Associated Words
Time Frame: Day 3
|
During the memory recall task on Day 3, participants will be shown a cue word (A) and asked to recall the corresponding associates from Day 1 (B) and Day 2 (C) by typing their response in a blank text field.
Participants will also report their confidence in these memories from 1 (not at all confident) to 9 (extremely confident).
|
Day 3
|
|
fMRI Measured Neural Reactivity (Blood Oxygen-Level Dependent Signal)
Time Frame: Day 2
|
fMRI data from Day 1 and Day 2 will be used to perform whole-brain analyses of neural response during encoding, as well as compute neural pattern similarity scores between AB and AC pairs from same- or differently-valenced contexts.
Our primary hypothesis is that the similarity of neural patterns in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex will predict memory performance on Day 3.
|
Day 2
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Source Memory
Time Frame: Day 3
|
During the memory recall task on Day 3, participants will also be asked to report which day each paired associate (B & C) was shown by selecting "1", "2", or "?" if unsure.
Additionally, participants will indicate the valence of the image that they remember being associated with each pair from 1 (very negative) to 9 (very positive), as well as their confidence in the remembered valence from 1 (not at all confident) to 9 (extremely confident).
|
Day 3
|
|
Change in Resting-State Functional Connectivity
Time Frame: Day 2
|
Prior work from our lab has shown that increased amygdala-visuosensory connectivity after encoding predicts a memory bias for negatively-valenced stimuli, whereas increased amygdala-prefrontal connectivity predicts a memory bias for positively-valenced stimuli.
In the current study, we will also examine whether changes in functional connectivity of the amygdala on Day 2 predict individual differences in memory performance on Day 3 (change = post - pre connectivity strength).
|
Day 2
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- MH134570
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
- ANALYTIC_CODE
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.