Embedded Primary Care MultiDisciplinary Diabetes Clinic

July 28, 2026 updated by: Britt A. Marshall, Emory University

Embedding and Evaluating Multidisciplinary Diabetes Management and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Into Primary Care for a Vulnerable Population

The purpose of this study is to improve diabetes management for patients at Midtown General Internal Medicine Clinic (Aim 1). The clinic offers dedicated diabetes care on certain days with trained providers able to offer dedicated diabetes care. The clinic will also make sure to address other aspects of life and health that may impact an individual's ability to manage their diabetes - food insecurity, housing insecurity, knowing about healthy food, finding ways to exercise, and mental health. The study will also train the medical residents to be able to participate in this dedicated diabetes care (Aim 2).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

There is a widening quality of care gap in diabetes mellitus (DM) management that sees Black and Hispanic patients with much higher rates of DM complications and hospitalizations compared to their white counterparts. Primary Care is the frontline for DM prevention and management; however, Primary Care Clinics, including Internal Medicine resident continuity clinics, struggle to improve DM metrics. The lack of resources, such as time and personnel, is a significant limiting factor in strategies that would allow these clinics to optimize care. As a result, the current DM management model was created, in which Primary Care providers refer patients with elevated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) to subspecialty care. This process is inefficient, overwhelms subspecialty practices, and most importantly does not address the social determinants of health that often make it difficult for patients to get their DM under control.

This traditional model also comes with a potential institutional financial cost. There is a perception that reducing upfront costs of care can make a system more economically viable; yet this can have devastating results for a system and for its patients on the back end. For example, HbA1c is a Merit-based Incentive Payment System Clinical Quality Measure if a patient population is not supported in their efforts for DM control, this can translate to monetary loss annually for the Emory Healthcare System. In addition, there are also potential losses to the system related to long-term morbidity and mortality risks of elevated HbA1c over time.

Studies have shown that a multi-disciplinary approach including physician, dietitian, DM education, psychotherapy, and social work services functioning concurrently and cooperatively has the potential to positively change the current paradigm. Given the vital role Primary Care plays in the management of all aspects of patient care, including physical and psychosocial well-being, this care delivery model is optimally designed to have the most impact and success in the Primary Care Clinic setting. The research team proposes to embed a multi-disciplinary diabetes-focused clinic within Primary Care in the Emory Healthcare System where this approach would create a central location for all the patients' DM needs, provide efficient care that helps patients address social and economic barriers, and engage the care team through between-clinic touchpoints to motivate patients to take agency over their health. This also provides a venue to implement modern technologies for DM management, such as continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Despite its proven efficacy in DM management, CGM remains an understudied intervention in Primary Care, especially in patient populations that would otherwise have difficulty accessing specialty care. Researchers anticipate that these changes will enable improved adherence to follow-up visits and treatment.

In addition to the benefits of streamlined patient care, this model also offers the opportunity to enhance Internal Medicine residency education. Investigators intend to develop a hybrid clinical/educational curriculum for residents that capitalizes on and models appropriate resource utilization through an integrated care model and provides early exposure to multi-disciplinary care and CGM.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
185

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
        • Emory Primary Clinic Care at Midtown

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Aim 1 (Embedded diabetes clinic):

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18+
  • Patient at Midtown Diabetes Clinic
  • Able to consent
  • HbA1c >=9%

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not planning to follow up at Midtown
  • Pregnancy
  • Followed by Endocrinology as a specialist

Aim 2 (Embedded diabetes clinic and curriculum):

Inclusion Criteria:

- All residents in Midtown Primary Care are eligible

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Embedded clinic at Midtown
Using the Emory Clinical Data Warehouse (CDW), all patients of Emory Primary Care Midtown with HbA1c >9% who are not currently under the care of an endocrinologist or the diabetes management program at Emory will be invited to participate in this embedded DM management clinic.
Other: Embedded Clinic
Once a week, a Primary Care clinic half-day will be dedicated to multi-disciplinary, team-based DM care. The inter-professional team will include an Internal Medicine attending physician, an Internal Medicine resident, a DM educator, a nurse trained in professional continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), a behavioral health provider, and a social worker to assist in finding resources for housing, food, and patient assistance programs.
Other Names:
  • Multi-disciplinary, team-based DM care

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Embedded Clinic Patients With an HbA1c >9%
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
Participants with HbA1c >9% since the embedded clinic implementation. Data will be assessed from electronic medical records (EMR)
Baseline and 6 months
HbA1C
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months
HbA1C results from electronic medical records.
Baseline and 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diabetes Self-efficacy Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months

Participants will complete the Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale (DMSES).

It assesses the extent to which respondents are confident in their ability to manage their blood sugar, diet, and exercise level. Responses are rated on a 5-point scale ranging from ''can't do at all'' (1) to ''certain can do'' (5). A sum of scores is calculated. On this scale, higher scores in each domain indicate greater self-efficacy in performing Diabetes self-management (DSM) activities, while lower scores indicate specific areas needing educational intervention. Score ranges:

Domain 1 Nutrition: 9-45 Domain 2 Treatment: 3-15 Domain 3 Physical Activity: 4-20 Domain 4 Monitoring: 4-20

Overall higher scores indicate a greater self-efficacy (better outcome).
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Depression will be assessed using the 9-question Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9), which is a diagnostic tool to screen adult patients in a primary care setting for the presence and severity of depression. Scores represent: 0-5 = mild 6-10 = moderate 11-15 = moderately severe. 16-20 = severe depression.
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) is a self-reported questionnaire for screening and severity measuring of generalized anxiety disorder. Questions reflect on symptoms over the past two weeks. Scoring: Items are rated on a scale from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"), with total scores ranging from 0 to 21. Scores represent 0-4: Minimal Anxiety; 5-9: Mild Anxiety; 10-14: Moderate Anxiety; a score greater than 15: Severe Anxiety
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Latin American and Caribbean (ELSCA) Household Food Security Measurement Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
To measure food insecurity, participants will complete the Latin American and Caribbean (ELSCA) Household Food Security Measurement Scale. This scale uses a set of 15 questions, with yes/no response categories, seven of which are for households with children. Each question asks the respondent whether he/she or any other household member has experienced a certain manifestation of food insecurity in the previous three months. Households that affirm 3 items are classified as food insecure.
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Urine Microalbumin
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Change in urine microalbumin (mcg/mg min 0 and higher the worse the outcome) will be calculated from available laboratory assessments from EMR
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Housing Insecurity Instrument
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months
Percentage of participants of being at risk for housing insecurity by answering the 2-question housing insecurity instrument: (1) "Are you worried or concerned that in the next 2 months you may not have stable housing that you own, rent, or stay in as part of a household?" with responses of "yes" or "no," and (2) "How likely do you think it would be that you would have to use a homeless shelter in the next 6 months?" with 4 response options ranging from "very unlikely" to "very likely."
Baseline, 3 months, and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Emory University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
American Diabetes Association
Georgia Center for Diabetes Translation Research

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Britt A Marshall, MD, Emory University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 20, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 24, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 24, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 23, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 28, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • STUDY00006033
  • P30DK111024 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • 2023P006207 (Other Identifier: Emory Insight Humans IRB)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The research team will share deidentified individual participant's data that underlie the results reported in the article after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices)

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The research team will share the deidentified data immediately following publication, with no known end date.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal to achieve the aims specified in their proposal

All proposals should be sent to britt.marshall@emory.edu.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings