Angiography-Derived Quantitative Functional Assessment Versus Pressure-Derived FFR and IMR: The FAIR Study
Diagnostic Performance of Angiography-Derived Quantitative Functional Assessment Compared to Pressure-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve and Index of Microcirculatory Resistance: The FAIR Study
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Lihui Li
- Phone Number: 13636480344
- Email: lihui.li@raysightmed.com
Study Locations
-
-
Guangdong
-
Jieyang, Guangdong, China
- Jieyang People's Hospital
-
Shenzhen, Guangdong, China, 518033
- The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
-
-
Hubei
-
Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430090
- Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
-
-
Yunnan
-
Kunming, Yunnan, China, 650051
- Yan'an Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310013
- Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria
General Inclusion Criteria:
- Age ≥18 years.
- Coronary angiography is required for patients with suspected or confirmed coronary artery disease.
- The subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent.
Angiographic Inclusion Criteria:
- Diameter stenosis of 30%-90% by visual estimate
- Reference vessel size ≥2 mm in stenotic segment by visual estimate
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded:
General Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject has undergone CABG of the target vessel.
- Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction within one week prior to the intended procedure.
- Severe heart failure (NYHA≥III)
- Patients with other serious conditions not eligible for clinical trials, such as severe arrhythmia or tachycardia, sinus syndrome, asthma, severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
- Serum creatinine level of >150µmol / L.
- Subject has known allergy to iodinated contrast agents, adenosine, or ATP.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding.
- Repeated enrollment.
- Any other factors that the researchers consider not suitable for diagnostic intervention or FFR and IMR detection, such as the target vessel has collateral circulation, coronary spasm, the target vessel plaque rupture resulting in myocardial infarction, or other reasons deemed unsuitable for inclusion.
Angiographic Exclusion Criteria:
- Myocardial bridge or coronary artery fistula on the study lesions.
- The target lesion ≥50% diameter stenosis in the left main coronary artery or ostial lesions less than 3 mm to the RCA.
- Low-quality angiography with poor contrast agent filling or inability to detect vascular boundaries due to various reasons, vascular overlap or severe distortion of the target vessel to fully expose the lesion location is not expected to be calculated.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
AngioQFA
|
FFR measured by pressure wire, AngioQFA computed by coronary angiographic images
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnostic sensitivity of AngioQFA versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of coronary ischemia on a per-patient basis.
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Positive FFR is defined as FFR≤0.80.
Positive AngioQFA is defined as AngioQFA≤0.80.
|
1 hour
|
|
Diagnostic sensitivity of AngioIMR versus wire-based IMR for demonstration of coronary microvascular dysfunction on a per-patient basis.
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Positive IMR is defined as IMR≥25.
Positive AngioIMR is defined as AngioIMR≥25.
|
1 hour
|
|
Diagnostic specificity of AngioQFA versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of coronary ischemia on a per-patient basis.
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Negative FFR is defined as FFR>0.80.
Negative AngioQFA is defined as AngioQFA>0.80.
|
1 hour
|
|
Diagnostic specificity of AngioIMR versus wire-based IMR for demonstration of coronary microvascular dysfunction on a per-patient basis.
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Negative IMR is defined as IMR<25.
Negative AngioIMR is defined as AngioIMR<25.
|
1 hour
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of AngioQFA versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of coronary ischemia on a per-patient basis.
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of AngioQFA versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of coronary ischemia on a per-patient basis.
|
1 hour
|
|
Diagnostic performance of AngioQFA in comparison to FFR on a per-vessel basis.
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Diagnostic performance includes sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.
|
1 hour
|
|
AUC and ROC of AngioQFA Versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of ischemia on a per-vessel basis and a per-patient basis.
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
AUC and ROC of AngioQFA Versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of ischemia on a per-vessel basis and a per-patient basis.
|
1 hour
|
|
The consistency of AngioQFA Versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of ischemia on a per-vessel basis and a per-patient basis.
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The consistency of AngioQFA Versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of ischemia on a per-vessel basis and a per-patient basis.
|
1 hour
|
|
Diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of AngioIMR versus wire-based IMR for demonstration of coronary microvascular dysfunction on a per-patient basis.
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Diagnostic accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of AngioIMR versus wire-based IMR for demonstration of coronary microvascular dysfunction on a per-patient basis.
|
1 hour
|
|
Diagnostic performance of AngioIMR in comparison to IMR on a per-vessel basis.
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Diagnostic performance includes sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value.
|
1 hour
|
|
AUC and ROC of AngioIMR Versus wire-based IMR for demonstration of coronary microvascular dysfunction on a per-vessel basis and a per-patient basis.
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
AUC and ROC of AngioIMR Versus wire-based IMR for demonstration of coronary microvascular dysfunction on a per-vessel basis and a per-patient basis.
|
1 hour
|
|
The consistency of AngioIMR Versus wire-based IMR for demonstration of coronary microvascular dysfunction on a per-vessel basis and a per-patient basis.
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The consistency of AngioIMR Versus wire-based IMR for demonstration of coronary microvascular dysfunction on a per-vessel basis and a per-patient basis.
|
1 hour
|
|
Diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of AngioQFA and QCA DS% versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of coronary ischemia.
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
FFR≤0.80 is defined as "positive", FFR>0.80 is defined as "negative"; DS%≥50% is defined as "positive", DS%<50% is defined as "negative".
|
1 hour
|
|
Diagnostic accuracy of AngioQFA versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of coronary ischemia after PCI.
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Postoperative FFR≤0.89 was defined as "positive", FFR>0.89 is defined as "negative".
|
1 hour
|
|
The Pearson correlation coefficient and consistency of AngioQFA Versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of ischemia on a per-vessel basis after PCI.
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The Pearson correlation coefficient and consistency of AngioQFA Versus wire-based FFR for demonstration of ischemia on a per-vessel basis after PCI.
|
1 hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Qiang Xue, Yan'an Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University
- Study Director: Hong Jiang, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University
- Principal Investigator: Guosheng Fu, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
- Principal Investigator: Jianwen Liang, The Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
- Principal Investigator: Qiang Wu, Jieyang People's Hospital
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- The FAIR Study
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.