Cryospray Therapy for Benign Airway Stenosis (CRYOSTASIS)
Cryospray Therapy for Benign Airway Stenosis: a Pilot Study (Pilot-CRYOSTASIS)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Ramsha Hamid
- Phone Number: (804) 628-2176
- Email: ramsha.hamid@vcuhealth.org
Study Locations
-
-
Virginia
-
Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
- Recruiting
- Virgnia Commonwealth University
-
Contact:
- Ramsha Hamid
- Phone Number: (804) 628-2176
- Email: ramsha.hamid@vcuhealth.org
-
Contact:
- Ray Shepherd
- Phone Number: 804-828-9071
- Email: ray.shepherd@vcuhealth.org
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Referral to interventional pulmonology or otorhinolaryngology or thoracic surgery for endoscopic management of suspected benign tracheal stenosis.
- Significant tracheal stenosis defined by stenosis ≥ 50% of tracheal lumen assessed on chest CT or previous bronchoscopy
- Able to provide informed consent.
- Age > 18
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to provide informed consent
- Pregnancy
- Known or suspected malignant central airway stenosis
- Patient has already been enrolled in this study.
Study subject has any disease or condition that interferes with safe completion of the study including:
- Hypoxemia with need for supplemental oxygen ≥ 2L/min by nasal canula
- Pneumothorax in the previous 12 months
- Severe COPD (defined as a FEV1/FVC < 70% and FEV1 <30% predicted) and/or severe persistent asthma.
- Hemodynamic instability with systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg or heart rate > 120 beats/min, unless deemed to be stable with these values by the attending physicians.
- Compromised tissue where significant ulceration or mucosal break is evident in the ablation area or adjacent organs.
- Significantly reduced tissue strength caused by prior procedure or pre-existing condition (e.g. PEG tube)
- Significantly reduced elasticity of the ablation area (e.g. Marfan's Syndrome)
- Prior complications with SCT (Spray cryotherapy)
- Contraindication to rigid bronchoscopy
- Significant tracheomalacia or alterations in cartilage integrity on CT (Computed Tomography) that would require stent placement or surgical referral.
- Greater than 1 BCAS intervention, excluding cricotracheal (tracheal surgery) resection, within 6 months before enrollment.
- Anatomical flow resistance (gas evacuation) where any procedure or anatomy proximal to the ablation site has significantly reduced or restricted the flow area of the lumen creating restriction where gas created from liquid nitrogen cannot adequately vent.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention
Bronchoscopic balloon dilation with radial cuts & truFreeze spray cryotherapy
|
Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser or Monopolar electrocautery knife
A novel FDA cleared technique that allows for liquid nitrogen (LN2) to be delivered in a metered fashion via a catheter through a flexible bronchoscope.
An endoscopic balloon that is inflated with water to pressures between 45 and 131 psi (3-9 atm) using a syringe and pressure manometer.
|
|
Active Comparator: Standard of care
Bronchoscopic balloon dilation with radial cuts
|
Carbon dioxide (CO2) laser or Monopolar electrocautery knife
An endoscopic balloon that is inflated with water to pressures between 45 and 131 psi (3-9 atm) using a syringe and pressure manometer.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Degree of re-stenosis
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The degree of re-stenosis at 6 months expressed as the percentage of airway lumen volume within the stenotic segment at 6 months compared to personal best patency volume on CT scan performed within five weeks of the study intervention.
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)
Time Frame: Continous for 6 months
|
Evidence supports the use of PEF as a simple, efficient, and accessible way of monitoring progression of tracheal stenosis.
PEF has previously been captured in clinical encounters as component of the decision-making algorithm for surgical intervention in tracheal stenosis patients.
Mobile Device Software 'App' can robustly capture longitudinal patient reported outcome measures.
A previously developed mobile device software 'Airflo' for tracking patient-generated health data and has proven the ability to successfully implement this software.
|
Continous for 6 months
|
|
Incidence of complications between groups
Time Frame: Continous for 6 months
|
Incidence of complications (hypoxemia, bleeding, pneumothorax rate, barotrauma).
|
Continous for 6 months
|
|
Clinical Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Questionnaire (CCQ)
Time Frame: 2 weeks before procedure, 2 weeks after the procedure, the 3 month study mark, the 6 months study mark,
|
The CCQ has been used as a validated quality of life measure in laryngotracheal stenosis.
The investigators will send surveys out to patients at set time intervals to assess symptom improvement pre- and post-intervention.
The questions are divided into three areas or domains.
Symptoms 1, 2, 5, 6; Functional state 7, 8, 9, 10; Mental state 3 and 4. All items are equally weighted by adding score of ten items and dividing by the number ten.
The score varies between 0 (very good health status) to 6 (extremely poor health status).
|
2 weeks before procedure, 2 weeks after the procedure, the 3 month study mark, the 6 months study mark,
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Ray Shepherd, Virginia Commonwealth University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HM20027230
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.