A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ETX101, an AAV9-Delivered Gene Therapy in Children With SCN1A-positive Dravet Syndrome (Australia Only)

November 13, 2025 updated by: Encoded Therapeutics

WAYFINDER: A Clinical Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of ETX101, an AAV9-Delivered Gene Therapy in Children With SCN1A-positive Dravet Syndrome

WAYFINDER is a Phase 1/2 study in Australia to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ETX101 in participants with SCN1A-positive Dravet syndrome aged 6 to <84 months. The study follows an open-label, dose-escalation design.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
4

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Australia
      • Melbourne, Australia
        • The Royal Children's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant must have a predicted loss of function pathogenic or likely pathogenic SCN1A variant.
  • Participant must have experienced their first seizure between the ages of 3 and 15 months.
  • Participant must have a clinical diagnosis of Dravet syndrome or the treating clinician must have a high clinical suspicion of a diagnosis of Dravet syndrome.
  • Participant is receiving at least one prophylactic antiseizure medication.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant has another genetic mutation or clinical comorbidity which could potentially confound the typical Dravet phenotype.
  • Participant has a known central nervous system structural and/or vascular abnormality (indicated by an MRI or CT scan of the brain).
  • Participant has an abnormality that may interfere with CSF distribution and/or has an existing ventriculoperitoneal shunt.
  • Participant is currently taking or has taken antiseizure medications (ASMs) at a therapeutic dose that are contraindicated in Dravet syndrome, including sodium channel blockers.
  • Participant has experienced seizure freedom for a period of 4 consecutive weeks within the 6-month period prior to informed consent.
  • Participant has previously received gene or cell therapy.
  • Participant is currently enrolled in a clinical trial or receiving an investigational therapy.
  • Participant has clinically significant underlying liver disease.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Cohort A
Cohort A will evaluate ETX101 dose level 1.
Drug: ETX101
ETX101 is composed of a non-replicating, recombinant adeno-associated viral serotype 9 (rAAV9) vector used to deliver a GABAergic regulatory element (reGABA) and an engineered transcription factor that increases transcription of the SCN1A gene (eTFSCN1A).
Experimental: Cohort B
Cohort B will evaluate ETX101 dose level 2.
Drug: ETX101
ETX101 is composed of a non-replicating, recombinant adeno-associated viral serotype 9 (rAAV9) vector used to deliver a GABAergic regulatory element (reGABA) and an engineered transcription factor that increases transcription of the SCN1A gene (eTFSCN1A).
Experimental: Cohort C
Cohort C will evaluate ETX101 dose level 3.
Drug: ETX101
ETX101 is composed of a non-replicating, recombinant adeno-associated viral serotype 9 (rAAV9) vector used to deliver a GABAergic regulatory element (reGABA) and an engineered transcription factor that increases transcription of the SCN1A gene (eTFSCN1A).
Experimental: Cohort D
Cohort D will evaluate ETX101 dose level 4.
Drug: ETX101
ETX101 is composed of a non-replicating, recombinant adeno-associated viral serotype 9 (rAAV9) vector used to deliver a GABAergic regulatory element (reGABA) and an engineered transcription factor that increases transcription of the SCN1A gene (eTFSCN1A).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportion of participants experiencing any treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), related AEs, AEs with severity Grade ≥ 3, AEs resulting in study discontinuation, and AEs with a fatal outcome.
Time Frame: Day 1 through Study Completion, an average of 5 years
Day 1 through Study Completion, an average of 5 years
Percent change from Baseline in monthly countable seizure frequency (MCSF) at Week 52, with countable seizures defined as generalized tonic-clonic/clonic, focal motor with clearly observable clinical signs, tonic bilateral, and atonic seizures.
Time Frame: Between the 8-week baseline period and the 48-week post-dosing assessment period (defined as Week 5 to Week 52 following administration of ETX101)
Between the 8-week baseline period and the 48-week post-dosing assessment period (defined as Week 5 to Week 52 following administration of ETX101)
Proportion of participants free from episodes of prolonged seizures and/or status epilepticus at Week 52.
Time Frame: Week 5 through Week 52
Week 5 through Week 52

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Proportion of participants with ≥ 90% reduction in monthly countable seizure frequency (MCSF) from Baseline at Week 52.
Time Frame: Between the 8-week baseline period and the 48-week post-dosing assessment period (defined as Week 5 to Week 52 following administration of ETX101)
Between the 8-week baseline period and the 48-week post-dosing assessment period (defined as Week 5 to Week 52 following administration of ETX101)
Change from Baseline in the Vineland-Third Edition Expressive Communication raw score at Week 52.
Time Frame: Baseline through Week 52. Higher scores correspond to better outcomes.
Baseline through Week 52. Higher scores correspond to better outcomes.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Encoded Therapeutics

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Salvador Rico, M.D., Ph.D, Encoded Therapeutics

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 28, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 30, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 14, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 13, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ETX-DS-004

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings