MR-proADM as a Early Biomarker for DGF and AR in Kidney and Liver Transplantation (DARE)

July 29, 2025 updated by: Roberta Angelico, University of Rome Tor Vergata
To define the sensibility and the specificity of increased levels of MR-proADM for early, non-invasive, diagnosis of AR and DGF after kidney and liver transplantation creating a predictive model for related complications after kidney and liver transplantation based on the pre-operative and post-operative levels of MR-proADM and by a machine learning process.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Despite long-term outcomes of kidney and liver transplantation significantly improved in the last decades, high morbidity and mortality is still an issue at short term after transplantation. Specifically, occurrence of delayed graft function (DGF) and early acute rejection (AR) may cause multi-organ failure or graft failure, admission to intensive care unit, prolonged hospitalization and high-dosage immunosuppressive therapy which might expose patients to several further complications such as infections, neoplasm, and metabolic disease. Consequently, solid organ transplant recipients represent a very frail population at high risk of complications. Therefore, development of new biomarkers for the prevention and early diagnosis of the major post-transplant complications influencing the morbidity and mortality of solid organ transplant recipients are needed. Adrenomedullin (ADM) is a 52-amino acid peptide with a variety of physiologic functions such as immunemodulating activity, direct bactericidal activity, maintenance of renal homeostasis, and vasodilatory activity. Recent study has shown that midregional proADM (MR-proADM) is co-synthesized with ADM in equimolar amounts and has the advantages of a longer half-life, lack of bioactivity and lack of protein binding. MR-proADM has been recognized as a prognostic marker, stratifying the mortality risk in patients with sepsis in intensive care units. Moreover, recently MD-proADM has been also associated with risk of specific organ failure such as acute kidney injury, acute liver damage, acute respiratory distress syndrome and acute cardiac injury. Literature results suggest that recovery of graft function after KT may lead to decrease in plasma MR-proADM level in patients with ESRD, and that plasma MR-proADM level may could increase in the early phases of DGF and AR after KT and LT as a response damage and to the immune activation. The study will allow to evaluate the utility MR-proADM as an early biomarker of DGF and AR in patients undergoing kidney and liver transplantation at our Institution. Also, the study aims to analyze how the value of this biomarker can change in association with post-transplant complication and to create a predicting model by machine cut-off values of references for MR-proADM.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Rome, Italy, 00133
        • Recruiting
        • University of Rome Tor Vergata

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Any adult kidney or liver transplant recipients who underwent OLT or KT at the University of Rome Tor Vergata with no indication for autoimmune diseases or for combined/dual transplant or re-transplantation

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Kidney transplant recipient at our Institution
  • Liver transplant recipient at our Institution

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Re-transplantation
  • Dual kidney transplantation
  • Combined transplant (kidney-liver, kidney-pancreas)
  • Autoimmune disease as indication to transplant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
OLT
Observation of MR-proADM levels at protocol timepoints to predict main (DGF and AR) and secondary (surgical complications, infections, others) complications after liver transplantation at our Institution.
Biological: MR-proADM dosage
Dosage of MR proADM at OLT/KT, 1, 3, 5, 15 POD and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 months F-U
KT
Observation of MR-proADM levels at protocol timepoints to predict main (DGF and AR) and secondary (surgical complications, urological complications, infections, others) complications after kidney transplantation at our Institution.
Biological: MR-proADM dosage
Dosage of MR proADM at OLT/KT, 1, 3, 5, 15 POD and 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 months F-U

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of MR-proADM as biomarker of DGF and AR in OLT/KT
Time Frame: 3 years
To define the sensibility and the specificity of increased levels of MR-proADM for early, non-invasive, diagnosis of AR and DGF after kidney and liver transplantation.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of MR-proAMD for early detection of other complications in OLT/KT
Time Frame: 3 years
Creating a predictive model of complications after kidney and liver transplantation based on the pre-operative and post-operative levels of MR-proADM by machine learning process.
3 years
Algorithm for risk prediction
Time Frame: 3 years
Development of a software algorithm predicting the risk of post-transplant complications
3 years
Digital Pathology Dataset
Time Frame: 3 years
Development of digital pathology for graft biopsy
3 years
MR-proADM Online Dataset
Time Frame: 3 years
Development of an online platform to collect and correlate data on post-transplant biopsy and MRPro-ADM levels.
3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Rome Tor Vergata

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Roberta Angelico, PhD FEBS, University of Rome Tor Vergata

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 12, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 11, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 1, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 29, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DARE

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings