Feasibility and Effectiveness of tDCS in the Treatment of Post-stroke Fatigue (EFECTS). (EFECTS)

May 21, 2026 updated by: Inés García Bouyssou, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Feasibility and Effectiveness of Tdcs in a Multimodal Treatment With Health Education and Aerobic Exercise in the Treatment of Post-stroke Fatigue.

This study aims to analyze the use of non-invasive brain stimulation (tDCS) is beneficial for the treatment of post-stroke fatigue.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A single-blind randomized clinical trial will be conducted. The intervention will consist of 8 20-minute tDCS sessions conducted over four weeks. The stimulation will be performed by applying the stimulation to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on the left side (F3) and the cathode will be at point O2 of the right hemisphere. The study will consist of two groups: the control group in which sham stimulation will be applied and therapeutic education and aerobic exercise; the intervention group in which stimulation, therapeutic education and therapeutic exercise will be carried out.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
54

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Spain
    • Spain
      • Barcelona, Spain, Spain, 08036
        • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • First stroke within 45 (+-7) days of the ischemic or hemorrhagic episode.
  • Ability to understand and execute simple instructions
  • Over 18 years.
  • Fatigue Scale of fatigue severity with a score greater than or equal to 24

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A score > 2 on the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) before the stroke.
  • Patients with decompensated cardiorespiratory and/or psychiatric pathology.
  • Comorbidity causing disproportionate fatigue, such as long-term COVID.
  • Patients who are cancer survivors or who are undergoing cancer treatment.
  • Patients with a history of epilepsy or who are taking antiepileptic medication.
  • Patents with major depression.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Sham Comparator: Control group
  • Therapeutic education about post-stroke fatigue
  • Sham stimulation with tDCS: Anode placed in F3 and cathode in O2, 20 minutes.
  • Aerobic exercise measured with Borg scale (moderate intensity)
Device: tDCS
Non invasive brain stimulation with sham and active comparators
Other Names:
  • physical exercise
  • therapeutic education
Active Comparator: Experimental group
  • Therapeutic education about post-stroke fatigue
  • Stimulation with tDCS: Anode placed in F3 and cathode in O2, intensity 2mA during 20 minutes.
  • Aerobic exercise measured with Borg scale (moderate intensity)
Device: tDCS
Non invasive brain stimulation with sham and active comparators
Other Names:
  • physical exercise
  • therapeutic education

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue Assessment Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 3 months post intervention. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.
The scale consists of 10 questions about the characteristics of fatigue in the current daily routine, which are rated on a five-point range from 1, "never," to 5, "always." Higher scores indicate more fatigue, with a cut-off point of ≥24 defining the presence of fatigue.
Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 3 months post intervention. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.
HADS
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 3 months post intervention. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.
It is a scale that can be used both at the hospital and outpatient level. It consists of 14 questions: 7 questions related to depression and another 7 related to anxiety. An independent score on each scale of ≥ 8 will be suggestive of depression and/or anxiety.
Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 3 months post intervention. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
National Institute of Health Stroke Scale
Time Frame: Baseline. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.
It is a scale with 15 items that is used to measure the severity of stroke. It includes different areas: level of consciousness, eye movements, integrity of visual fields, facial movements, muscle strength, sensitivity, coordination, language and negligence. Each item is scored on an ordinal scale from 0 to 2, 0 to 3 or 0 to 4. The total is added and a score is obtained that can range from 0 to 42, the higher the score, the greater the deficits.
Baseline. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Borg Modified Scale
Time Frame: During the sessions. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.
The Borg scale is a tool that measures a person's perception of exertion, shortness of breath, and fatigue during physical exertion. It is a modified scale, it is an 11-point scale that ranges from 0=no fatigue to 10=very great effort.
During the sessions. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.
PROMIS-Sleep
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 3 months post intervention. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.
This is a Likert-type scale that evaluates the quality of sleep during the last week. Each item on the measure is rated on a 5-point scale (1=never; 2=rarely; 3=sometimes; 4=often; and 5=always) with a range in score from 8 to 40 with higher scores indicating greater severity of sleep disturbance.
Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 3 months post intervention. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Modified Rankin Scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 6 months post intervention. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.
It is the most commonly used functional measure in stroke research, particularly in studies evaluating the effectiveness of treatments. The scale is numerical and ranges from 0 to 6. 0: no symptoms; 1: without significant disability (the patient is able to carry out his/her usual activities and obligations); 2: mild disability; 3: moderate disability; 4: moderately severe disability; 5: severe disability (totally dependent patient); 6: death.
Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 6 months post intervention. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 3 months post intervention. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.
To measure the level of physical activity during the last week. There are two forms of output from scoring the IPAQ. Results can be reported in categories (low activity levels, moderate activity levels or high activity levels) or as a continuous variable (MET minutes a week). MET minutes represent the amount of energy expended carrying out physical activity. A MET is a multiple of your estimated resting energy expenditure. One MET is what you expend when you are at rest. Therefore 2 METS is twice what you expend at rest. To get a continuous variable score from the IPAQ (MET minutes a week) we will consider walking to be 3.3 METS, moderate physical activity to be 4 METS and vigorous physical activity to be 8 METS.
Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 3 months post intervention. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Eq-5D
Time Frame: Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 3 months post intervention. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.
Assess the quality of life perceived by the patients. The scale ranges from 100 ('the best imaginable health state' or 'the best health state you can imagine') to 0 ('the worst imaginable health state' or 'the worst health you can imagine'). This is used to obtain a respondent's stated preference values, not to record their own health state.
Baseline, 1 month post intervention and 3 months post intervention. Reported through study completion, an average of 1 year.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 10, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 5, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 21, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 14, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 20, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 21, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HCB/2022/1193

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings