Metoclopramide for Gastric Visualization in Active Upper GI Bleeding

December 11, 2023 updated by: Rapat Pittayanon, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital

Efficacy of Metoclopramide for Gastric Visualization by Endoscopy in Patients With Active Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Multicenter, Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aim to evaluate the efficacy of metoclopramide for gastric visualization in patients with active UGIB. This is a double-blinded, multicenter RCT. Patients with 'active' UGIB (hematemesis or presence of fresh blood in the nasogastric tube) were enrolled. The eligible patients were randomly assigned in a concealed 1:1 allocation to received either intravenous metoclopramide or placebo before endoscopy. The primary outcome was 'adequate visualization' by objective endoscopic visualized scores(EVS). Secondary outcomes included mean difference in total EVS and EVS at each location , duration of EGD, immediate hemostasis, need for a second look EGD, units of blood transfusion, length of hospital stay and 30-day rebleeding rate.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

  • This is double-blinded, multicenter RCT including six hospitals in Thailand.
  • The participated endoscopists had work experience for endoscopy more than three years.
  • All endoscopists at six participating sites attended the pre-study meeting for standardization of the protocol and scoring system.
  • The primary outcome was 'adequate visualization' by objective endoscopic visualized scores(EVS). ; To assess overall endoscopic visualization, we estimated the coverage of a blood clot on mucosa in four locations including 1) gastric fundus, 2) corpus, 3) antrum and 4) duodenal bulb, according to the reference endoscopic views in protocal.
  • All photos, including the reference endoscopic views, were taken and internally validated by another endoscopist who was blinded to the randomization allocation.
  • This study includes pre-specified subgroup analysis by location of bleeding including gastric subgroup analysis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
220

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Thailand
      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10330
        • Recruiting
        • King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10330
        • Not yet recruiting
        • King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Thanrada Vimonsuntirungsri, MD
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Rapat Pittayanon, MD, MSc
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Natee Faknak, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Nutbordee Nalinthassanai, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Thaninee Prasoppokakorn, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Nicha Teeratorn, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Yingluk Sritunyarat, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All adult patients (aged ≥ 18years)
  • Active UGIB who arrived at emergency room (ER) and had a schedule for EGD within 12 hours after onset of bleeding ; Active UGIB was defined as having hematemesis or fresh blood by diagnostic gastric lavage at the ER.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • known allergy to metoclopramide
  • prior gastric or duodenal surgery
  • known case of esophageal, gastric or duodenal cancer;
  • advanced HIV infection (defined as WHO criteria13-15: CD4 <200 cell/mm3 or WHO clinical stage 3 or 4)
  • pregnancy
  • gastric lavage was performed with solution > 50 ml.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Metoclopramide group
Metoclopramide 10 mg +NSS 10ml IV 30-60 min before EGD
Drug: Metoclopramide Sulfone
Metoclopramide 10mg+NSS 10 ml IV 30-60 minutes before EGD
Placebo Comparator: Placebo group
NSS 10 ml IV 30-60 min before EGD
Drug: Normal Saline 10 mL Injection
Normal saline 10 ml IV 30-60 minutes before EGD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients with 'adequate visualization'
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimate 2 years
'adequate visualization' is determined by objective scoring method (endoscopic visualized scores (EVS) to estimate the coverage of a blood clot on mucosa in four locations including 1) gastric fundus, 2) corpus, 3) antrum and 4) duodenal bulb; At each location was assessed and scored between 0 and 2: 0, blood clot cover more than 75% of the surface ; 1, 25-75% blood clot coverage ; 2, blood clot coverage less than 25%. ; score >=6 considered as adequate visualization
Through study completion, estimate 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The mean difference in EVS
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimate 2 years
total of four locations and at each location including fundus, corpus, antrum and duodenal bulb
Through study completion, estimate 2 years
Duration of esophagogastroduodenoscopy
Time Frame: 10minutes to 2 hours
10minutes to 2 hours
Immediate hemostasis
Time Frame: Through study completion, estimate 2 years
Rate of succession of hemostasis (bleeding stop) at first EGD
Through study completion, estimate 2 years
The need for a second look EGD within 72 hours after initial endoscopy
Time Frame: Up to 72 hours
Rate of need for a second look EGD within 72 hours after initial endoscopy The 72-hour recurrent GI bleeding was documented and re-EGD was performed to confirm rebleeding if the following conditions were met: I) hematemesis or bloody nasogastric tube (NG) > 6 hours after endoscopy; II) melena after normalization of stool color; III) hematochezia after normalization of stool color or melena; IV) development of tachycardia (HR ≥ 110 bpm) or hypotension(SBP ≤ 90 mmHg) after ≥ 1 hour of vital sign stability without other cause; V) hemoglobin drop of ≥ 2 g/dL after two consecutive stable hemoglobin values ( < 0.5 g/dL decrease) ≥ 3 hours apart; VI) tachycardia or hypotension that does not resolve within 8 hours after index endoscopy despite appropriate resuscitation (in the absence of an alternative explanation), associated with persistent melena or hematochezia or; VII) persistently dropping hemoglobin of > 3 g/dL in 24 hours associated with persistent melena or hematochezia.
Up to 72 hours
Number of unit of red blood cell transfusion during first 24 hours
Time Frame: Up to 24 hours
Number of of unit of red blood cell transfusions during first 24 hours
Up to 24 hours
Length of hospital stays
Time Frame: 1day - 30days
Length of hospital stays of participants
1day - 30days
30-day rebleeding rate
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
rate of 30-day rebleeding of upper GI tract
Up to 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 11, 2023

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 13, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 11, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Metoclopramide.UGIB

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings