Acute Analgesic Effects of DMT on Experimentally Induced Pain in Healthy Participants (DPS)

April 1, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Acute Analgesic Effects of DMT on Experimentally Induced Acute Nociceptive Pain, Hyperalgesia and Allodynia in Healthy Participants

N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT) is a classical psychedelic with similar effects like LSD or psilocybin. Preliminary evidence from case series and small open-label trials suggests that psychedelics may be promising candidates for the treatment of several pain-related diseases such as chronic pain, migraine, cluster headache or phantom limb pain. However, data from rigorously conducted and randomized clinical trials are lacking. Additionally, the potential acute analgesic properties of psychedelics remain poorly characterized. Therefore, the investigators will evaluate the efficacy of DMT on different pain qualities within a model of electrically induced pain in healthy participants. The analgesic effects will be compared to racemic ketamine (active control) and placebo within a cross-over design.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Preliminary evidence from case series and small open-label trials suggests that psychedelics may be promising candidates for the treatment of several pain-related diseases such as chronic pain, migraine, cluster headache or phantom limb pain. However, data from rigorously conducted and randomized clinical trials are lacking. Additionally, the potential acute analgesic properties of psychedelics remain poorly characterized. For instance, it is unclear whether psychedelics possess acute antinociceptive effects or if they rather modulate secondary pain phenomena such as hyperalgesia, allodynia, and/or functional pain. Here, the investigators will employ a validated electrical stimulation model in healthy volunteers that produces acute nociceptive pain but also features of chronic pain such as hyperalgesia and allodynia. The model is established for the detailed assessment of the analgesic effect of known analgesics or new compounds. Thus, the investigators will evaluate the efficacy of N,N-dimethyltryptamine (DMT), a classical and naturally-occurring psychedelic, on different pain qualities within this model. DMT differs from other classical psychedelics in its very short elimination half-life. Due to its rapid metabolization by monoaminoxidases (MAO), DMT is not orally bioavailable in the absence of MAO-inhibitors and thus has to be administered continuously and intravenously. Recently, the investigators tested several continuous intravenous administration regimes of DMT that lead to the induction of a constant and rapidly adaptable psychedelic state. The regime allows to induce stable DMT effect that can be terminated rapidly. Due to this controllability, a continuous infusion of intravenous DMT is most suitable to assess time and concentration-dependent analgesic effects within the used pain model. The analgesic efficacy of DMT will be compared to ketamine, a known analgesic (positive control), and placebo.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
17

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
    • Basel
      • Basel, Basel, Switzerland, 4056
        • Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, University Hospital Basel

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age between 25 and 75 years old
  2. Sufficient understanding of the German language
  3. Understanding of procedures and risks associated with the study
  4. Willing to adhere to the protocol and signing of the consent form
  5. Willing to refrain from the consumption of illicit psychoactive substances during the study 6. Willing not to operate heavy machinery for 24 hours after the study session.

7. Willing to use effective birth control throughout study participation 8. Body mass index between 18-29 kg/m2 and body weight within 50 - 90kg

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Chronic or acute medical condition
  2. Current or previous major psychiatric disorder
  3. Psychotic disorder or bipolar disorder in first-degree relatives
  4. Hypertension (SBP>140/90 mmHg) or hypotension (SBP<85 mmHg)
  5. Hallucinogenic and/or dissociative substance use (not including cannabis) more than 15 times or any time within the previous two months
  6. Pregnancy or current breastfeeding
  7. Participation in another clinical trial (currently or within the last 30 days)
  8. Use of medication that may interfere with the effects of the study medication
  9. Tobacco smoking (>10 cigarettes/day)
  10. Consumption of alcoholic beverages (>20 drinks/week)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intravenous infusion of DMT
Participants will be administered intravenous DMT.
Drug: Intravenous infusion of DMT
A dose rate of 1.2 mg/min will be administered
Active Comparator: Intravenous infusion of ketamine
Participants will be administered intravenous racemic ketamine.
Drug: Intravenous infusion of ketamine
A dose rate of 1.0 mg/min will be administered
Placebo Comparator: Intravenous infusion of placebo
Participants will be administered intravenous lacebo (saline infusion).
Drug: Intravenous infusion of placebo
A Placebo (saline infusion) will be administered.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Numeric rating scale (NRS) scores (0 - 10)
Time Frame: During the infusion (55minutes)
Difference of the cumulative NRS scores (area under the effect curves (AUECs)) between the DMT, ketamine (active-control) and placebo condition. NRS 0 represents "no pain at all" whereas 10 represents "the worst pain ever possible".
During the infusion (55minutes)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area of hyperalgesia and allodynia
Time Frame: During the electrical stimulation (2 hours)
Difference of the cumulative areas of hyperalgesia and allodynia (Area under the effect curves (AUECs), in square centimeters * minutes) between the DMT, ketamine and placebo condition.
During the electrical stimulation (2 hours)
NRS scores after infusion
Time Frame: After stopping the infusion (65 minutes)
Difference of the cumulative NRS scores (Area under the effect curves (AUECs)) between the DMT, ketamine and placebo condition
After stopping the infusion (65 minutes)
Association of subjective effect ratings with pain scores
Time Frame: During the electrical stimulation (2 hours)
Assessment of the correlation between subjective effect ratings and NRS pain scores, areas of hyperalgesia and allodynia. Subjective effects are measured on the subjective effects scale (SES) that ranges from 0 ( = no effects) to 10 ( = most extreme effects).
During the electrical stimulation (2 hours)
Sensory and affective pain scores
Time Frame: Retrospective evaluation after the electrial stimulation at the end of each study session.
Difference of retrospectively evaluated sensory and affective pain scores (Short version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire, SF-MPQ-D) between the DMT, ketamine and placebo condition. The SF-MPQ-D is scored from 0 (= no pain) to 3 (= strongest possible pain).
Retrospective evaluation after the electrial stimulation at the end of each study session.
Association of psychedelic and mystical-type effects with pain scores
Time Frame: During the electrical stimulation (2 hours) and retrospective evaluation at the end of each study session.
Correlation between psychedelic and mystical-type effects (Five Dimensional Altered states of consciousness (5D-ASC), States of Consciousness Questionnaire (SCQ)) with NRS pain scores and areas of hyperalgesia and allodynia.
During the electrical stimulation (2 hours) and retrospective evaluation at the end of each study session.
Plasma levels of DMT and ketamine
Time Frame: During the electrical stimulation (2 hours)
Plasma levels of DMT and ketamine over time
During the electrical stimulation (2 hours)
Association of the intensity of electrical currents with NRS pain scores
Time Frame: During the electrical stimulation (2 hours)
Association of the intensity of electrical currents (in mA) that induced a target baseline pain score (NRS) of 6/10 with NRS pain scores and areas of hyperalgesia and allodynia.
During the electrical stimulation (2 hours)
Psychometric comparison between DMT, ketamine and placebo
Time Frame: During the electrical stimulation (2 hours) and retrospective evaluation at the end of each study session.
Comparison of subjective effects, altered state of consciousness and mystical effect scores between DMT, ketamine, and placebo.
During the electrical stimulation (2 hours) and retrospective evaluation at the end of each study session.
Effect modulation through personality traits
Time Frame: During the electrical stimulation (2 hours) and retrospective evaluation at the end of each study session.
Effect modulation through personality traits (NEO-Five Factor Inventary (NEO-FFI), Saarbrücken Persönlichkeitsfragebogen (SPF), Elliots humility scale (EHS), Defense-style questionnaire-40 (DSQ-40), Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC), Five Facet Mindfulness Scale (FFMQ), ABC Connectedness to Nature Scale, (ABC-CNS)).
During the electrical stimulation (2 hours) and retrospective evaluation at the end of each study session.
Modulation of personality traits by acute subjective effects
Time Frame: During the electrical stimulation (2 hours) and retrospective evaluation at the end of each study session.
Modulation of personality traits resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale, CD-RISC), mindfulness (Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire (FFMQ) and connectedness to nature (ABC-CNS) in association with acute subjective effects (Subjective Effects Scale (SES)) and psychedelic/mystical-type effects (Five Dimensional Altered States of consciousness Scale (5D-ASC), States of Consciousness Questionnaire (SCQ).
During the electrical stimulation (2 hours) and retrospective evaluation at the end of each study session.
Autonomic effects
Time Frame: During the electrical stimulation (2 hours)
Autonomic effects over time (blood pressure in mmHg, heart rate in beats per minute)
During the electrical stimulation (2 hours)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 23, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 29, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 6, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 20, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 22, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 1, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • BASEC 2023-01813

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings