Can Flowable Bulk Fill Composites be Used in Proximal Area of Class II Restorations (OPUSFCLASSII)
Can Flowable Bulk Fill Composites be Used in Proximal Area of Class II Restorations: A Double-blinded Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Rio de Janeiro
-
Nova Friburgo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 28625-650
- Universidade Federal Fluminense - School of Dentistry
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Volunteers must have at only 20 teeth in function
- Volunteers must have at only 2 carious proximo-occlusal lesions, or old restorations that need to be changed, in different teeth
- These lesions must be more than 3 mm deep in the oclusal area and more than 5 mm deep in the proximal area, should have exposed dentin, and must have at only 50% of margins in enamel
- Teeth should not present periodontal mobility
Exclusion Criteria:
- Volunteers with periodontal disease
- Volunteers with gingival bleeding
- Volunteers that have uses anti-inflammatory drugs in the last 30 days
- Pregnant volunteers
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Incremental Composite in Proximal Wall
38 teeth will receive class II restorations using flowable bulk fill composite to fill the cavities, leaving the proximal wall and the occlusal surface to be restored with traditional incremental composite.
|
Proximo-occlusal lesions will receive the self-etch adhesive system Ambar Universal APS with selective acid etching, according to the manufacturers instrucions.
Then, proximal wall will be completely restored with Vittra APS composite resin, using the triangular incremental traditional technique described for classe II restorations.
Then, Opus Bulk Fill Flow APS will be used in the bulk technique with up to 5mm depth increments, leaving 1 mm in the occlusal for incremental Vittra APS composite resin, that will be used with the traditional incremental technique.
Both composites will be light-cured with VALO light-cure unit (Ultradent, USA) for 40 seconds.
|
|
Experimental: Bulk Fill Composite in Proximal Wall
38 teeth will receive class II restorations using flowable bulk fill composite to fill the cavities, leaving the occlusal surface to be restored with traditional incremental composite.
|
Proximo-occlusal lesions will receive the self-etch adhesive system Ambar Universal APS with selective acid etching, according to the manufacturers instrucions.
Then, Opus Bulk Fill Flow APS resin will be used in the bulk technique with up to 5mm depth increments, leaving 1 mm in the occlusal for incremental Vittra APS composite resin, that will be used with the traditional incremental technique.
Both composites will be light-cured with VALO light-cure unit (Ultradent, USA) for 40 seconds.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Restoration Loss
Time Frame: Five years
|
It will be evaluated the increase in the number of losses of dental restorations in the period of five years, verified by periodic visual clinical examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of remaining restorations in the different groups.
|
Five years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Marginal Pigmentation
Time Frame: Five years
|
It will be evaluated the increase in the number of dental restorations with marginal pigmentation in the period of five years, verified by periodic clinical visual examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of stained restorations in the different groups.
|
Five years
|
|
Post-Operative Hypersensitivity
Time Frame: Five years
|
It will be evaluated the increase in the number of dental restorations with dentin hypersensitivity in the period of five years, verified by periodic clinical examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of restorations with dentin hypersensitivity in the different groups.
|
Five years
|
|
Secondary Caries
Time Frame: Five years
|
It will be evaluated the increase in the number of dental restorations with secondary caries in the period of five years, verified by periodic radiographic examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of restorations with secondary caries in the different groups.
|
Five years
|
|
Marginal Adaptation
Time Frame: Five years
|
It will be evaluated the increase in the number of dental restorations with problems in the marginal adaptation in the period of five years, verified by periodic clinical visual examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of stained restorations in the different groups.
|
Five years
|
|
Color Match
Time Frame: Five years
|
It will be evaluated the increase in the number of dental restorations with changes in the color of the restoration after clinical use, in the period of five years, verified by periodic clinical visual examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of stained restorations in the different groups.
|
Five years
|
|
Proximal Contact Quality
Time Frame: Five years
|
It will be evaluated the increase in the number of dental restorations with problems in proximal contact of the restoration after clinical use, in the period of five years, verified by periodic clinical visual examination (6/6 months) based on the statement of difference of at least 25% in the amount of stained restorations in the different groups.
|
Five years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: MARCOS O BARCELEIRO, PhD, Universidade Federal Fluminense
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2011;9(8):672-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Oct 13. No abstract available.
- Costa T, Rezende M, Sakamoto A, Bittencourt B, Dalzochio P, Loguercio AD, Reis A. Influence of Adhesive Type and Placement Technique on Postoperative Sensitivity in Posterior Composite Restorations. Oper Dent. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):143-154. doi: 10.2341/16-010-C. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
- van Dijken JW, Pallesen U. A randomized controlled three year evaluation of "bulk-filled" posterior resin restorations based on stress decreasing resin technology. Dent Mater. 2014 Sep;30(9):e245-51. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.05.028. Epub 2014 Jun 21.
- Tardem C, Albuquerque EG, Lopes LS, Marins SS, Calazans FS, Poubel LA, Barcelos R, Barceleiro MO. Clinical time and postoperative sensitivity after use of bulk-fill (syringe and capsule) vs. incremental filling composites: a randomized clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2019 Sep 16;33(0):e089. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2019.vol33.0089.
- Chesterman J, Jowett A, Gallacher A, Nixon P. Bulk-fill resin-based composite restorative materials: a review. Br Dent J. 2017 Mar 10;222(5):337-344. doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2017.214.
- van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U. Bulk-filled posterior resin restorations based on stress-decreasing resin technology: a randomized, controlled 6-year evaluation. Eur J Oral Sci. 2017 Aug;125(4):303-309. doi: 10.1111/eos.12351. Epub 2017 May 19.
- Reis A, Dourado Loguercio A, Schroeder M, Luque-Martinez I, Masterson D, Cople Maia L. Does the adhesive strategy influence the post-operative sensitivity in adult patients with posterior resin composite restorations?: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2015 Sep;31(9):1052-67. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
- Hirani RT, Batra R, Kapoor S. Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Sensitivity in Bulk Fill Restoratives: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018 Nov-Dec;8(6):534-539. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_218_18. Epub 2018 Nov 29.
- da Veiga AM, Cunha AC, Ferreira DM, da Silva Fidalgo TK, Chianca TK, Reis KR, Maia LC. Longevity of direct and indirect resin composite restorations in permanent posterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2016 Nov;54:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
- Vianna-de-Pinho MG, Rego GF, Vidal ML, Alonso RCB, Schneider LFJ, Cavalcante LM. Clinical Time Required and Internal Adaptation in Cavities restored with Bulk-fill Composites. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Dec 1;18(12):1107-1111. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2184.
- Guney T, Yazici AR. 24-Month Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk-Fill Restorative Resins in Class II Restorations. Oper Dent. 2020 Mar/Apr;45(2):123-133. doi: 10.2341/18-144-C. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
- Loguercio AD, Rezende M, Gutierrez MF, Costa TF, Armas-Vega A, Reis A. Randomized 36-month follow-up of posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations. J Dent. 2019 Jun;85:93-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 May 14.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- ISNFUFFBULKFGM1
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.