Prospective Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Bronchoalveolar Lavage Combined With Pathogen Metagenomic Sequencing Technology in the Diagnosis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Associated Pneumonia

January 3, 2024 updated by: Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University
Immune checkpoint inhibitor associated pneumonia (CIP) is a common immune related adverse reaction, accounting for 35% of all deaths. However, due to the lack of typical clinical symptoms and imaging manifestations, CIP needs to be differentiated from other diseases such as pulmonary infections and lung cancer progression. Currently, there is a lack of diagnostic gold standards, which belongs to exclusive diagnosis. Empirical diagnosis and treatment in clinical practice can easily lead to the abuse of hormones and antibiotics, and even misdiagnosis and mistreatment, resulting in patient death. Therefore, early identification of CIP and pulmonary infection is the key to successful diagnosis and treatment. The CIP diagnosis and treatment guidelines recommend performing bronchoalveolar lavage as appropriate, but there is still a lack of large-scale prospective clinical studies. The beneficial pathogen metagenomic sequencing technology for the diagnosis of pulmonary infections has not been mentioned. Our research group conducted a prospective clinical study for the first time to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of bronchoalveolar lavage combined with pathogen metagenomic sequencing technology in diagnosing CIP, explore biomarkers for diagnosing CIP, in order to improve the early diagnosis rate and treatment efficiency of CIP, and reduce the abuse of antibiotics and hormones.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
104

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
        • Recruiting
        • Southern Medical University Nanfang Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

  1. Failure to complete microscopic examination and culture of alveolar lavage fluid or sputum;
  2. The researcher believes that there are any individuals who are not suitable for inclusion.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Voluntarily sign an informed consent form;
  2. Age range from 18 to 75 years old, regardless of gender;
  3. Immunosuppressive host;
  4. Symptoms, signs, or imaging signs of pneumonia are visible, and empirical anti infection treatment is ineffective.

Exclusion Criteria:

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
CIP cohort
Diagnostic test: Bronchoalveolar lavage and pathogen metagenomic sequencing
After the patient is enrolled, traditional pathogen testing will be improved, and the clinical physician will make a preliminary diagnosis based on routine pathogen testing, clinical manifestations, infection indicators, and imaging. Within 24 hours of initial diagnosis, bronchoalveolar lavage and pathogen metagenomic sequencing were performed, and BALF mNGS results were fed back to clinical physicians (without interfering with clinical decision-making). Clinical treatment data of patients were collected at 72 hours, 7 days, 14 days, and 28 days after the start of treatment, and follow-up and efficacy evaluation were conducted. Finally, a review committee consisting of two senior respiratory physicians and one imaging physician conducted a systematic review of cases to make the final diagnosis of enrolled patients (as the gold standard), analyzing the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of BALF mNGS in diagnosing CIP.
non CIP cohort
Diagnostic test: Bronchoalveolar lavage and pathogen metagenomic sequencing
After the patient is enrolled, traditional pathogen testing will be improved, and the clinical physician will make a preliminary diagnosis based on routine pathogen testing, clinical manifestations, infection indicators, and imaging. Within 24 hours of initial diagnosis, bronchoalveolar lavage and pathogen metagenomic sequencing were performed, and BALF mNGS results were fed back to clinical physicians (without interfering with clinical decision-making). Clinical treatment data of patients were collected at 72 hours, 7 days, 14 days, and 28 days after the start of treatment, and follow-up and efficacy evaluation were conducted. Finally, a review committee consisting of two senior respiratory physicians and one imaging physician conducted a systematic review of cases to make the final diagnosis of enrolled patients (as the gold standard), analyzing the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of BALF mNGS in diagnosing CIP.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Sensitivity, specificity in suspected CIP patients
Time Frame: 2023.01-2026.01
2023.01-2026.01
Positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV) in suspected CIP patients
Time Frame: 2023.01-2026.01
2023.01-2026.01

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 14, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 3, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 5, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 5, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 3, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NFEC-2023-276

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings