Comparing Manual and Neurocognitive Skills-While Sitting, Standing, Walking on a Treadmill and Using a Stepper.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
- Mayo Clinic in Rochester
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Dan Abraham Healthy Living Center (DAHLC) members and non-members that have provided informed consent to participate in this study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unable to stand up, walk on a treadmill or use a stepper.
- Alzheimer, dementia or any memory impairment.
- Cannot attempt fine motor skills.
- Not willing to use a treadmill, stepper or standing desk.
- Not a present user of an active office.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Healthy Subjects
Healthy subjects will attend the the Active Wellness Office at the Dan Abraham Healthy Living Center (DAHLC) at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, for four consecutive days.
On day one, individuals will use a sitting workstation (control); based on randomization, three active workstations (standing, stepping, or walking stations) will be randomly assigned on the following days (2-4).
|
Subjects will conduct reasoning, memory, concentration, and fine motor skills (neurocognitive function) assessments on a computer station in a seated position.
Subjects will conduct reasoning, memory, concentration, and fine motor skills (neurocognitive function) assessments on a computer station while standing.
Subjects will conduct reasoning, memory, concentration, and fine motor skills (neurocognitive function) assessments on a computer station while utilizing a stepper.
Subjects will conduct reasoning, memory, concentration, and fine motor skills (neurocognitive function) assessments on a computer station while walking on a treadmill.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Double Trouble Task Score
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
The Double Trouble Task is a computer based reasoning assessment that evaluates the Stroop effect which relates to the increased difficulty a person has in naming the print color of a word when the text of that word refers to an 'incongruent' color.
It evaluates the capacity to inhibit automatic word recognition by selectively focusing the attention to impede the automated access of distracting word information.
In the website version, three words appear on the screen, one at the top, and two at the bottom.
Subjects click the word at the bottom that matches the color at the top for 90 seconds and 1 point for each correct answer.
Higher scores represent better reasoning skills & neurocognitive function.
|
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
|
Grammatical Reasoning Test Score
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
The Grammatical Reasoning Test is a computer based reasoning assessment that measures the capacity of a person to reason the relationships among different objects and shapes.
A statement appears at the top of the screen with two shapes at the bottom.
Participants clicked on 'True' or 'False' to indicate whether the sentence accurately described the relationship between the shapes in 90 seconds and participants obtained 1 point for each correct answer.
Higher scores represent better reasoning skills & neurocognitive function.
|
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
|
Odd One Out Test Score
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
The Odd One Out Test is a computer based reasoning assessment which evaluates the person's Intelligence Quotient.
It measures fluid intelligence or the capacity to reason abstractly and solve problems.
Derived from Raven's and Cattell's intelligence tests.
During the test, 9 patterns (color, shape, and number) appeared on the screen; participants chose the pattern (odd one) that differed from the others for 3 minutes and got 1 point for each correct answer.
Higher scores represent better reasoning skills & neurocognitive function.
|
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
|
Object Reasoning Task Score
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
The Object Reasoning Task is a computer based reasoning assessment that evaluates an individual's capability to make logical deductions from a sequence of complex images.
Subjects look at 4 panels, 3 at the top and 1 at the bottom.
Each panel contained four separate diagrams; subjects decided whether the panel at the bottom was the next in the series or not.
It takes 3 minutes and 1 point for each correct answer.
Higher scores represent better reasoning skills & neurocognitive function.
|
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
|
Spatial Span Task Score
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
The Spatial Span Task is a computer based memory assessment that assesses the visuospatial working memory that depends on the unitary short-term memory system.
Participants must remember a sequence of flashing boxes and click to the correct order; when they make a mistake the test ends and they have 3 opportunities.
When they click in the right order, the following sequence increases difficulty.
4 points are the baseline; for each correct answer subjects get 1 point; if incorrect, they lose points.
Higher scores represent better memory skills & neurocognitive function.
|
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
|
Monkey Ladder Task Score
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
The Monkey Ladder Task is a computer based memory assessment that assesses the visual working memory better developed in chimpanzees than humans.
Participants must remember which number appears in specific boxes, after a short period, the numbers disappear and they have to click on the boxes in numerical sequence, after three errors the test ends.
2 points are the baseline.
Participants get 1 point for the correct answers; if incorrect, they lose the points earned.
Higher scores represent better memory skills & neurocognitive function.
|
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
|
Digit Span Task Score
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
The Digit Span Task is a computer based memory assessment that evaluates the verbal working memory that allows the temporary storage and manipulation of information.
Participants must remember a sequence of numbers by typing them using the keyboard; after typing the correct sequence of numbers, the difficulty increases and after 3 mistakes the test ends.
Participants get 1 point for a proper sequence; if incorrect, they lose points.
Higher scores represent better memory skills & neurocognitive function.
|
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
|
Paired Associates Task Score
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
The Paired Associates Task is a computer based memory assessment that assesses the paired-associate learning skills, a mental skill that requires learning to pair two items in memory.
When the difficulty increases, several regions in the brain activate.
During the task, a set of boxes appear on the screen.
The boxes open, one after the other to reveal the figure inside, and subjects must remember and click which figure appears in which box.
The difficulty increases in the number of figures after clicking the correct sequence and subjects will have three opportunities.
Participants get 1 point for the right answers; if incorrect, they lose the points.
Higher scores represent better memory skills & neurocognitive function.
|
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
|
Rotations Task Score
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
The Rotations Task is a computer based concentration assessment that measures the ability to rotate objects mentally.
Two rotated boxes appear on the screen, each filled with red and green squares.
Participants click the boxes 'Match' or 'Mismatch' in 90 seconds, if the answer is correct, they get 8 points; if not, they lose the points.
Higher scores represent better concentration skills & neurocognitive function.
|
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
|
Feature Match Task Score
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
The Feature Match Task is a computer based concentration assessment that measures perception, requires concentration and focuses on complex images.
Two boxes appear on the screen one at the left and the other to the right, each containing a complex array of abstract shapes.
Subjects will click if the figures 'Match' or 'Mismatch' for 90 seconds.
If correct, the next problem will be more difficult.
The points are given according to the problem's difficulty; they can vary from 1-11and above.
Higher scores represent better concentration skills & neurocognitive function.
|
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
|
Polygons Task Score
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
The Polygons Task Score is a computer based concentration assessment that measures the mental ability to compare complex images.
Two overlapping images appear on one side of the monitor, and another figure appears on the other side and contains just one shape.
Subjects click 'Match' or 'Mismatch' to indicate if the single figure is identical or different in shape from one of the overlapping figures.
Each chance will increase in difficulty.
Subjects in 90 seconds will try to score as many points as they can, points per correct answer can vary from 1-6 points and above.
Higher scores represent better concentration skills & neurocognitive function.
|
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
|
Typing Test Score
Time Frame: Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
The Typing Test is a computer based fine motor skills assessment.
It is measured using the Split Screen Typing Program (Typing Master Inc., Helsinki, Finland).
Subjects completed a 3-minute test typing as fast and accurately as they could, the top of the screen showed the text that participants had to type, and the typed text was seen at the bottom of the computer monitor.
Participants typed one different script for each station.
Typing speed, as well as accuracy represented by number of errors, and adjusted individual typing speed at each workstation were scored.
The higher typing speed & accuracy scores (low number of errors) represent better fine motor skills.
|
Day 1, Day 2, Day 3, Day 4
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Francisco Lopez-Jimenez, MD, MS, Mayo Clinic
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 15-005471
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Healthy
-
NCT06818032RecruitingHealthy | Healthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy Volunteer | Healthy Adult | Healthy Volunteers Only | Healthy Male and Female Subjects | Healthy Non-smokers
-
NCT07232121RecruitingHealthy | Healthy Participants | Healthy Adult Females | Volunteer | Healthy Adult Male
-
NCT07197047CompletedHealthy | Healthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy Participants | Static Stretching | Stretch | Stretching
-
NCT05361343RecruitingHealthy Aging | Healthy Diet | Healthy Lifestyle
-
NCT07515417Active, not recruitingHealthy | Healthy Participants | Healthy Adult | Healthy Women | Healthy Adult Females | Healthy Adult Participants | Healthy Young Adults | Healthy Adult Female Participants | Healthy Adult Male | Poor Sleep Quality
-
NCT07520474CompletedHealthy Participants | Healthy Adult Participants | Healthy Young Adults
-
NCT03278535CompletedHealthy Volunteers | Healthy Subjects | Healthy Adults
-
NCT05218980Not yet recruitingHealth-related Benefits of Introducing Table Olives Into the Diet of Young Adults: Olives For HealthHealthy Diet | Healthy Lifestyle | Healthy Nutrition | Cholesterol
-
NCT07597928Recruiting
-
NCT07285122RecruitingHealthy | Healthy Smoker
Clinical Trials on Sitting workstation
-
NCT04122326CompletedMusculoskeletal Pain | Musculoskeletal Injury | Musculoskeletal Strain
-
NCT07382466Not yet recruitingMusculoskeletal Disorders | Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorders | Occupational Musculoskeletal Disorders
-
NCT03174262Completed
-
NCT02932787Completed
-
NCT02206113CompletedQuality of Life | Stress
-
NCT01086930CompletedSpinal Cord Injury
-
NCT01997970CompletedObesity | Overweight
-
NCT02870088CompletedInsulin Sensitivity