Responses to Message Source and Presentation Using Psychophysiology
Identifying and Examining the Effects of Source and Presentation on Responses to Electronic Cigarette Public Education Messages in Young Adult Vapers and Non-vapers - Part 2
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01605
- UMass Chan Medical School Shaw Building
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ages 18-24
- Fluent in English
- Either vaping in the past 30 days or not having vaped in the past 30 days but susceptible to vaping
- Self-reported abstinence of combusted tobacco or marijuana at time of visit
Exclusion Criteria:
- Ages below 18 or above 24
- Not fluent in English
- Not confirmed self-reported abstinence of combusted tobacco or marijuana at time of visit
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Expert, one-sided
Participants assigned to the expert, one-sidedness condition will receive one-sided e-cigarette messages from an expert source.
|
Participants will view a brief description of an expert source and see one-sided e-cigarette education messages.
|
|
Experimental: Expert, two-sided
Participants assigned to the expert, two-sidedness condition will receive two-sided e-cigarette messages from an expert source.
|
Participants will view a brief description of an expert source and see two-sided e-cigarette education messages.
|
|
Experimental: Peer, one-sided
Participants assigned to the peer, one-sidedness condition will receive one-sided e-cigarette messages from a peer source.
|
Participants will view a brief description of a peer source and see one-sided e-cigarette education messages.
|
|
Experimental: Peer, two-sided
Participants assigned to the peer, two-sidedness condition will receive two-sided e-cigarette messages from a peer source.
|
Participants will view a brief description of a peer source and see two-sided e-cigarette education messages.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Visual Attention
Time Frame: The entire duration of message from beginning of its delivery to the completion of viewing, up to 45 minutes.
|
Visual attention was assessed by measuring dwell time, which is the length of time participants spent on looking at the specific areas of interest (AOIs) collected in miliseconds.
Dwell time values were collected for 18 messages, and aggregated to provide the average dwell time scores for each arm.
This was done for each vaping status (current vapers and susceptible non-vapers).
Higher dwell time scores indicate higher visual attention, indicating better message outcomes.
|
The entire duration of message from beginning of its delivery to the completion of viewing, up to 45 minutes.
|
|
Allocation of Cognitive Resources
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after viewing all the messages (approximately 45 minutes).
|
Heart rate values were collected in beats per minute (BPM) on a per-second basis during the presentation of each 18 distinct messages as well as during the immediately preceding black screen (baseline) for each message.
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize changes in the BPM values during the message exposure period by comparing the BPM values collected during each message second to the BPM values collected during the immediately preceding baseline period.
These change scores were then averaged across all messages within each study arm to generate a mean BPM value per condition, and this was done for each vaping status (current vapers and susceptible non-vapers).
Lower BPM values reflect greater cognitive response, therefore indicate better message outcomes.
|
Baseline and immediately after viewing all the messages (approximately 45 minutes).
|
|
Arousal
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after viewing all the messages (approximately 45 minutes).
|
Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) values were recorded in microsiemens on a per-second basis during the presentation of each 18 distinct messages as well as during the immediately preceding black screen (baseline) for each message.
Descriptive statistics were used to summarize changes in GSR values by comparing each message response to its preceding baseline period.
These change scores were then averaged across all messages within each study arm to generate a mean GSR score per condition, and this was done for each vaping status group (current vapers and susceptible non-vapers).
Higher GSR values reflect greater physiological arousal, and indicate better message outcomes.
|
Baseline and immediately after viewing all the messages (approximately 45 minutes).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Attitudes
Time Frame: After exposure to all messages, approximately up to 45 minutes.
|
Participants' self-reported vaping attitudes were measured by using a five-point bipolar scale using 7 subscale items assessing whether participants thought vaping was enjoyable, healthy, safe, fun, smart, cool, and attractive on a scale from 1 (negative attitudes) to 5 (positive attitudes).
Items were summed and averaged to create a single composite score, and this was done for each arm for each vaping status.
Higher scores indicate more positive e-cigarette attitudes, therefore worse outcomes.
|
After exposure to all messages, approximately up to 45 minutes.
|
|
Behavioral Intentions
Time Frame: After exposure to all messages, approximately up to 45 minutes.
|
Participants' vaping intentions was measured by using a 3 subscale items assessing participants' intentions to vape: soon/anytime during the next year/would use offered by one of their best friends, on a scale from 1 (Definitely not) to 5 (Definitely yes).
Items were summed and averaged to create a single composite score.
This was done for each vaping status (current vapers and susceptible non-vapers).
Higher scores indicate greater vaping intentions, therefore indicating worse outcome.
|
After exposure to all messages, approximately up to 45 minutes.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Donghee N Lee, PhD, University of Massachusetts, Worcester
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00001223
- 1K99CA281094-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.