Prostate Cancer Detection Rate of Targeted Biopsies With PCaVision
Clinical Validation of Transrectal Multiparametric Ultrasound Imaging Strategy (PCaVision) for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: a Head-to-head Comparison With the MRI-based Strategy
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Auke Jager, MD
- Email: a.jager1@amsterdamumc.nl
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Daniel van den Kroonenberg, MD
- Phone Number: 310639345375
- Email: d.kroonenbergvanden@amsterdamumc.nl
Study Locations
-
-
-
Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Amsterdam UMC - location VUmc
-
Baarn, Netherlands
- Andros Clinics
-
Hoofddorp, Netherlands
- Spaarne Gasthuis
-
Nieuwegein, Netherlands
- St. Antonius
-
Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Fransiscus Gasthuis
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- be male
- have an age of 18 years or older
- be biopsy naïve
- have a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer
- be scheduled for evaluation by prostate MRI based on a suspicious DRE and/or elevated serum PSA
- have signed informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- active (urinary tract) infection or prostatitis
- a patient history with a cardiac right-to-left shunt.
- allergic to sulphur hexafluoride or any of the other ingredients of the ultrasound contrast agent SonoVue
- current treatment with dobutamine
- known severe pulmonary hypertension (pulmonary artery pressure >90 mmHg), uncontrolled systemic hypertension or respiratory distress syndrome
- any (further) contraindication to undergo MRI or 3D mpUS imaging
- incapable of understanding the language in which the patient information is given.
- medical history of prostate surgery
- treatment of 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors for at least 3 months
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Diagnostic evaluation of prostate cancer
|
The procedure of 3D multiparametric ultrasound consists of 3 components: (1) intravenous administration of ultrasound contrast; (2) rectal multi-parametric ultrasound imaging; (3) PCaVision: artificial intelligence algorithm analyzing the images.
MRI sequences will include at least T1-weighted, T2-weighted, Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps.
Scoring of suspicion will be performed using the European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) PI-RADS standardized scoring system.
All lesions will be marked and delineated for MRI-TRUS fusion 3D multiparametric ultrasound (mpUS).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in targeted biopsies based on PCaVision imaging in comparison with the detection rate of clinically significant cancer in targeted biopsies based on MRI.
Time Frame: Two weeks
|
csPCa defined as GG ≥ 2 in any of the biopsy cores taken from a lesion
|
Two weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of men in whom targeted biopsies could be safely omitted in the PCaVision pathway versus the MRI pathway.
Time Frame: Two weeks
|
Defined as the number of men in whom no lesions for target biopsies have been identified by PCaVision while no CsPCa is detected in either MRI targeted biopsies or systematic biopsies.
|
Two weeks
|
|
Detection rate of three different definitions of prostate cancer in targeted biopsies based on PCaVision imaging (PCaVision pathway) in comparison with the detection rate of targeted biopsies based on MRI (MRI pathway).
Time Frame: Two weeks
|
(i) ISUP ≥ 3 in any of the biopsy cores taken from a lesion; (ii) ISUP ≥ 2 with cribriform growth and/or intraductal carcinoma (CR/IDC) in any of the biopsy cores taken from a lesion; (iii) ISUP = 1
|
Two weeks
|
|
Number of men in whom the PCaVision pathway generated insufficient quality images with the number of men with insufficient quality MRI images in the MRI pathway.
Time Frame: Two weeks
|
Two weeks
|
|
|
Detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer in targeted biopsies based on PCaVision imaging using various incremental levels of PCaVision's image quality requirements in comparison with the detection rate of targeted biopsies based on MRI.
Time Frame: Two weeks
|
Two weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Postema AW, Frinking PJ, Smeenge M, De Reijke TM, De la Rosette JJ, Tranquart F, Wijkstra H. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound parametric imaging for the detection of prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2016 Apr;117(4):598-603. doi: 10.1111/bju.13116. Epub 2015 Jun 29.
- van Moorselaar RJ, Voest EE. Angiogenesis in prostate cancer: its role in disease progression and possible therapeutic approaches. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2002 Nov 29;197(1-2):239-50. doi: 10.1016/s0303-7207(02)00262-9.
- Russo G, Mischi M, Scheepens W, De la Rosette JJ, Wijkstra H. Angiogenesis in prostate cancer: onset, progression and imaging. BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E794-808. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11444.x. Epub 2012 Sep 7.
- Mischi M, Kuenen MP, Wijkstra H. Angiogenesis imaging by spatiotemporal analysis of ultrasound contrast agent dispersion kinetics. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2012 Apr;59(4):621-9. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2012.2241.
- Kuenen MP, Saidov TA, Wijkstra H, de la Rosette JJ, Mischi M. Spatiotemporal correlation of ultrasound contrast agent dilution curves for angiogenesis localization by dispersion imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2013 Dec;60(12):2665-9. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2865.
- Postema AW, Gayet MCW, van Sloun RJG, Wildeboer RR, Mannaerts CK, Savci-Heijink CD, Schalk SG, Kajtazovic A, van der Poel H, Mulders PFA, Beerlage HP, Mischi M, Wijkstra H. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound with dispersion analysis for the localization of prostate cancer: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimens. World J Urol. 2020 Nov;38(11):2811-2818. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03103-4. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
- Mannaerts CK, Engelbrecht MRW, Postema AW, van Kollenburg RAA, Hoeks CMA, Savci-Heijink CD, Van Sloun RJG, Wildeboer RR, De Reijke TM, Mischi M, Wijkstra H. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naive men: direct comparison of systematic biopsy, multiparametric MRI- and contrast-ultrasound-dispersion imaging-targeted biopsy. BJU Int. 2020 Oct;126(4):481-493. doi: 10.1111/bju.15093. Epub 2020 May 13.
- Mannaerts CK, Wildeboer RR, Remmers S, van Kollenburg RAA, Kajtazovic A, Hagemann J, Postema AW, van Sloun RJG, J Roobol M, Tilki D, Mischi M, Wijkstra H, Salomon G. Multiparametric Ultrasound for Prostate Cancer Detection and Localization: Correlation of B-mode, Shear Wave Elastography and Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound with Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. J Urol. 2019 Dec;202(6):1166-1173. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000415. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
- Jager A, Vilanova JC, Michi M, Wijkstra H, Oddens JR. The challenge of prostate biopsy guidance in the era of mpMRI detected lesion: ultrasound-guided versus in-bore biopsy. Br J Radiol. 2022 Mar 1;95(1131):20210363. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20210363. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
- van den Kroonenberg DL, Jager A, Garrido-Utrilla A, Reitsma JB, Postema AW, Beerlage HP, Oddens JR. Clinical Validation of Multiparametric Ultrasound for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Computer-Aided Diagnosis: A Direct Comparison with the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pathway. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Jul 1;66:60-66. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.06.012. eCollection 2024 Aug.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- NL82101.000.22
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.