Usefulness of Metoclopramide to Improve Endoscopic Visualization in Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

October 7, 2024 updated by: Jose Luis Herrera Elizondo, Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon
A prospective, randomized, double-blind study will be conducted, including all patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding, defined as vomiting blood or black bowel movements, within 24 hours prior to admission. Patients will be randomized to receive intravenous metoclopramide 20 mg or placebo, a placebo is a look-alike substance that contains no active drug. Then endoscopy will be performed in the following 120 minutes, evaluating endoscopic visualization with the modified Avgerinos scale.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A prospective, longitudinal, randomized, double-blind study will be carried out in which all patients who come to the University Hospital "Dr. José Eleuterio González" with upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding, defined in our study as hematemesis or melena, including patients with this condition in the 24 hours prior to admission. Patients will be randomized to receive metoclopramide 20 mg IV or placebo, this randomization will be performed by means of a computer sequence to receive each of the treatment sequences. Subsequently, the upper endoscopy will be performed in the following 120 minutes, and the endoscopic visualization will be evaluated by the physician performing the procedure by means of the modified Avgerinos scale; which gives a score of 0-2 according to the percentage of mucosal vision; 0= <25% visible surface, 1= 25%-75% visible surface and 2= >75% visible surface, evaluating fundus, body, antrum and bulb, a score ≥ 6 will be considered a clean stomach and a score ≤ 5 will be considered full stomach. The diagnosis of origin of the upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding will be determined by the physician in charge of performing the endoscopy. All cases will be filmed and another physician will review the cases and validate the Avgerinos score, as well as the final diagnosis reported.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Mexico
    • Nuevo León
      • Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico, 64460
        • Hospital Universitario Dr. José Eleuterio González, UANL

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Hospitalized patients ≥18 years of age with variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding (hematemesis and/or melena).
  • ≤12 hours of bleeding evolution.
  • Hemodynamic stability at the time of upper endoscopy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients <18 years old.
  • Pregnant patients.
  • Metoclopramide allergy.
  • Refusal to be part of the study protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Metoclopramide
Patients will be randomized to receive metoclopramide 20 mg IV single dose.
Drug: Metoclopramide
Patients will receive metoclopramide 20 mg IV in a single dose prior to randomization.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Patients will be randomized to receive placebo 10 ml IV single dose.
Drug: Placebo
Patients will receive placebo 10 ml IV in a single dose prior to randomization.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determine the usefulness of metoclopramide in improving endoscopic visualisation in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
Time Frame: From admission to discharge for up to 5 days, during this time their clinical condition will be evaluated, through a general physical examination, taking vital signs and questioning them about possible side effects associated with metoclopramide
Using modified Avgerinos scale; which gives a score of 0-2 according to the percentage of mucosal vision; 0 = <25% visible surface, 1 = 25%-75% visible surface and 2= >75% visible surface, evaluating fundus, body, antrum and bulb, a score ≥ 6 will be considered a clean stomach and a score ≤ 5 will be considered full stomach.
From admission to discharge for up to 5 days, during this time their clinical condition will be evaluated, through a general physical examination, taking vital signs and questioning them about possible side effects associated with metoclopramide

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
To determine whether the use of metoclopramide avoids repeating the endoscopic procedure.
Time Frame: From admission to discharge for up to 5 days, during this time it will be evaluated the need for new endoscopy in case clinical data of new bleeding from the digestive tract evidenced by melena or hematemesis.
The need to repeat the endoscopic procedure will be evaluated in case clinical data of new bleeding from the digestive tract, evidenced by melena or hematemesis is found.
From admission to discharge for up to 5 days, during this time it will be evaluated the need for new endoscopy in case clinical data of new bleeding from the digestive tract evidenced by melena or hematemesis.
To determine whether the use of metoclopramide shortens the length of hospital stay.
Time Frame: From admission to discharge for up to 30 days, during this time their clinical condition will be evaluated, through a general physical examination, taking vital signs and questioning them about possible side effects associated with metoclopramide.
The days of hospital stay will be counted and comparing both arms.
From admission to discharge for up to 30 days, during this time their clinical condition will be evaluated, through a general physical examination, taking vital signs and questioning them about possible side effects associated with metoclopramide.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universidad Autonoma de Nuevo Leon

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: José Luis Herrera Elizondo, Physician, Hospital Universitario Dr. José Eleuterio González, UANL

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 23, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 29, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 7, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 7, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GA22-00011

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings