Non-ablative Radiofrequency and Low Intensity Shock Wave Therapy in Fibrotic Plaque in Men With Peyronie's Disease

May 27, 2024 updated by: Centro de Atenção ao Assoalho Pélvico

Non-ablative Radiofrequency and Low-intensity Shock Wave Therapy in Fibrotic Plaque in Men With Peyronie's Disease: Case Series

The goal of this one arm clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and describe the clinical response of non-ablative radiofrequency treatment associated with shockwave therapy in men with Peyronie's disease. The main question[s] it aims to answer are: • is the treatment safe? • is there any clinical response to the proposed treatment? Participants will respond to five validated questionnaires: International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF-5), Medical Outcomes Study 36 - Item Short - Form Health Survey (SF-36), Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ), Scale Hospital for Anxiety and Depression (SHAD) and the Erection Quality Questionnaire (EQQ); will undergo a physical assessment that includes palpation of the fibrotic plaque on the penis, pharmacological induction of erection, and assessment of the size of the fibrotic plaque through ultrasound. Every five sessions, the participant's degree of satisfaction will be measured using a 5-point Likert scale, as well as the evolution of symptoms will also be observed, using a 10-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and penile pain, if present. The entire evaluation protocol will be applied before (pre-test), after treatment (post-test) and 1 month after the end of treatment. Volunteers will be monitored by telephone to verify the long-term response after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of completed treatment in relation to the Likert scale and VAS. The treatments they'll be given are • of monopolar non-ablative radiofrequency associated with • low-intensity shock wave therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
10

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • Ba
      • Salvador, Ba, Brazil, 40.290-000
        • Recruiting
        • Centro de Atenção ao Assoalho Pélvico
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Patricia V Lordelo, Phd
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Carlos Mamede, Phd

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical complaint related to Peyronie's disease;
  • At any stage of the disease (acute or chronic).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Users of a pacemaker, cardiac defibrillator implant or any other electromagnetic implant;
  • Metallic implants over or under the area to be treated.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: RF and SWT
The treatment will be carried out through the application of monopolar non-ablative radiofrequency (IBRAMED, Amparo, São Paulo, Brazil - model Neartek) associated with electromagnetic low-intensity shock wave therapy (IBRAMED, Amparo, São Paulo, Brazil - model THOOR) on the fibrotic plaque in the penis, 2 to 5 times a week, according to the patient's availability, totaling 24 sessions.
Device: Non-ablative Radiofrequency
There are two electrodes: one active, which will be used on the penis, using a non-lubricated condom from the Blowtex brand, using pharmaceutical glycerin to emit radiofrequency inside and outside the condom, and another electrode, dispersive, wrapped in PVC-type plastic film, coupled to the region of the patient's penis where there is no fibrotic plaque, which will act as earth and the temperature to be used in the treatment will be 38°C. When the desired heating is reached, the device maintains the temperature and thus the radiofrequency application will be maintained for 2 minutes.
Device: Low-intensity Shock Wave Therapy
The equipment's applicator is covered with transparent PVC film and non-alcoholic gel is used as a coupling medium between the applicator and the penis. The following parameters are used: frequency of 10Hz, energy of 120mJ and 2,000 shots in the fibrotic plaque.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
It is estimated that non-ablative RF associated with low-intensity SWT in patients with Peyronie Disease is a safe technique that leads to a satisfactory clinical response in relation to sexual function.
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment till 8 weeks, then at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
It will be measured by the questionnaire International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF-5). Lower values represent worse sexual function and are categorized as follows: 5-7 points represents severe erectile dysfunction, 8-11 points represents moderate erectile dysfunction, 12-16 represents mild to moderate erectile dysfunction, 17 -21 represents mild erectile dysfunction and 22-25 means no erectile dysfunction.
From enrollment to the end of treatment till 8 weeks, then at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
It is estimated that non-ablative RF associated with low-intensity SWT in patients with Peyronie Disease is a safe technique that leads to a satisfactory clinical response in relation to pain.
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment till 8 weeks, then at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
The level of pain will be assess by the question three questions of Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ). Each of the three questions score from 0 to 10, so the total range will be from 0 to 30. The lower the score, the less pain the patient feels.
From enrollment to the end of treatment till 8 weeks, then at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
It is estimated that non-ablative RF associated with low-intensity SWT in patients with Peyronie Disease is a safe technique that leads to a satisfactory clinical response in relation to penile erection.
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment till 8 weeks, then at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
The quality of penile erection will be measured by the Quality of Erection Questionnaire. The final score can vary between 0 and 100 points, with the higher the score, the better the quality of the erection.
From enrollment to the end of treatment till 8 weeks, then at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
It is estimated that non-ablative RF associated with low-intensity SWT in patients with Peyronie Disease is a technique that promotes a positive impact on quality of life and psycho-emotional aspects of anxiety and depression.
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment till 8 weeks, then at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
It will be measured by the questionnaire Medical Outcomes Study 36 - Item Short - Form Health Survey (SF-36). The final score for each domain ranges from 0 to 100 (there are two - body and mental), there is no cutoff point and higher scores indicate a better health status.
From enrollment to the end of treatment till 8 weeks, then at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
It is estimated that non-ablative RF associated with low-intensity SWT in patients with Peyronie Disease is a technique that promotes a positive impact on psycho-emotional aspects of anxiety and depression.
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment till 8 weeks, then at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.
It will be measured by the questionnaire Scale Hospital for Anxiety and Depression. It is composed of two subscales, one for anxiety and the other for depression, with seven items each. The global score on each subscale ranges from 0 to 21. The lower the score, the lower level of anxiety/or depression.
From enrollment to the end of treatment till 8 weeks, then at 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centro de Atenção ao Assoalho Pélvico

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 8, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 4, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 12, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 29, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 27, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 74001323.3.0000.5544

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings